• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过农业干预措施应对粮食不安全问题:印度的“农民第一”计划

Confronting food insecurity through agricultural interventions: the Farmer FIRST program in India.

作者信息

Venkatesan Purushothaman, Sivaramane Nilakandan, Srinivasa Rao Ch, Venkattakumar Ramanujam, Sivakumar Sethuraman, Mooventhan Palanisamy, Burman Rajarshi Roy, Kalyani Bommu, Challa Lalitha Navya

机构信息

ICAR- National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, India.

ICAR- Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, India.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2025 Jan 14;11:1423599. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1423599. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2024.1423599
PMID:39877538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11772211/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions are crucial in addressing malnutrition and promoting food security. The Farmer, Farm, Innovation, Resources, Science, and Technology (FIRST) Program is a national-level agricultural intervention program that was started in 2016 by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). Its primary objective is to transform the lives and livelihoods of Indian farmers, with a focus on income and livelihood security. This program envisages agricultural interventions ensuring national food security goals, with improved agricultural practices, enhanced food production, and increased access to nutritious food, especially for vulnerable populations.

METHODS

This study aims to investigate the food security improvement resulting from implementing nutrition-sensitive interventions introduced under the Farmer FIRST Program (FFP) in 15 agroecological zones. Four key indicators were employed to assess food security in the technology-focused field intervention: food availability, purchasing power, food gap, and food diversity. Food availability was measured at the macro level (state or national) using per capita food availability. However, at the micro level, particularly for farmers who produce their food and are secure in terms of availability, yield increases from the selected interventions under FFP served as an alternative measure. Purchasing power was assessed by the additional income generated to buy food during the off-season. The food gap was assessed using the cereal equivalent quantity (CEQ), which captures an aspect of consumers' nutritional security. Its impact in India was evaluated using the propensity score matching technique with difference-in-difference (D-i-D) measure to estimate the unbiased overall effect on food security. Food diversity was captured using Barry's index.

RESULTS

A sample of 2,282 respondents were interviewed from 2016 to 2020 to elicit data on the prevalence of undernutrition in India, which is 16.3%. The results revealed that post-intervention of the FFP, cereal availability increased by 147.74% in the Northern Plain, while pulses recorded over 200% growth in three regions. The incremental per capita farm income exceeded INR 20,000 in several zones, with the Northern Plain showing an increase of over 21 times. Food diversity improved marginally, supported by the integrated farming system. Overall, FFP interventions transformed nutritional security, benefiting 1,915 households, particularly in regions with historically low calorie intake, thereby demonstrating substantial gains in food security and living standards.

CONCLUSION

The Farmer FIRST Program (FFP) has significantly improved dietary intake among participating households, enhancing food security. Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions under the FFP have reduced undernutrition by increasing food availability, boosting purchasing power, and narrowing the food gap.

摘要

引言

营养敏感型农业干预措施对于解决营养不良问题和促进粮食安全至关重要。农民、农场、创新、资源、科学与技术(FIRST)计划是一项国家级农业干预计划,由印度农业研究理事会(ICAR)于2016年启动。其主要目标是改变印度农民的生活和生计,重点是收入和生计保障。该计划设想通过改进农业实践、提高粮食产量以及增加特别是弱势群体获取营养食品的机会,实施农业干预措施以确保国家粮食安全目标。

方法

本研究旨在调查在15个农业生态区实施农民FIRST计划(FFP)引入的营养敏感型干预措施后粮食安全的改善情况。采用四个关键指标来评估以技术为重点的田间干预措施中的粮食安全:粮食供应、购买力、粮食缺口和食物多样性。粮食供应在宏观层面(邦或国家)使用人均粮食供应量来衡量。然而,在微观层面,特别是对于自己生产粮食且供应有保障的农民,FFP选定干预措施带来的产量增加作为替代衡量指标。购买力通过在淡季购买粮食所产生的额外收入来评估。粮食缺口使用谷物当量(CEQ)来评估,它反映了消费者营养安全的一个方面。使用倾向得分匹配技术和差分法(D-i-D)来评估其在印度的影响,以估计对粮食安全的无偏总体效应。食物多样性使用巴里指数来衡量。

结果

在2016年至2020年期间,对2282名受访者进行了抽样访谈,以获取印度营养不良患病率的数据,该患病率为16.3%。结果显示,FFP干预后,北部平原的谷物供应量增加了147.74%,而在三个地区豆类的增长超过200%。几个地区人均农业收入增量超过20000印度卢比,北部平原增长超过21倍。在综合农业系统的支持下,食物多样性略有改善。总体而言,FFP干预改变了营养安全状况,使1915户家庭受益,特别是在历史卡路里摄入量较低的地区,从而在粮食安全和生活水平方面取得了显著成效。

结论

农民FIRST计划(FFP)显著改善了参与家庭的饮食摄入,增强了粮食安全。FFP下的营养敏感型农业干预措施通过增加粮食供应、提高购买力和缩小粮食缺口,减少了营养不良。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/b8b752a00ba3/fnut-11-1423599-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/bb5abc186671/fnut-11-1423599-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/590dab8b2fbe/fnut-11-1423599-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/cea86fa7585c/fnut-11-1423599-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/919ea502f414/fnut-11-1423599-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/b8b752a00ba3/fnut-11-1423599-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/bb5abc186671/fnut-11-1423599-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/590dab8b2fbe/fnut-11-1423599-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/cea86fa7585c/fnut-11-1423599-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/919ea502f414/fnut-11-1423599-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc2c/11772211/b8b752a00ba3/fnut-11-1423599-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Confronting food insecurity through agricultural interventions: the Farmer FIRST program in India.通过农业干预措施应对粮食不安全问题:印度的“农民第一”计划
Front Nutr. 2025 Jan 14;11:1423599. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1423599. eCollection 2024.
2
Does Crop Diversity Influence Household Food Security and Women's Individual Dietary Diversity? A Cross-Sectional Study of Malawian Farmers in a Participatory Agroecology and Nutrition Project.作物多样性是否会影响家庭粮食安全和妇女个体的饮食多样性?参与式农业生态学和营养项目中马拉维农民的横断面研究。
Food Nutr Bull. 2022 Dec;43(4):395-411. doi: 10.1177/03795721221126787. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
3
Pathways and policy options for food and nutrition gaps in arid agricultural farming systems in the Tigray Region, north Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷地区干旱农业种植系统中粮食与营养缺口的路径及政策选择
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 26;10(7):e28213. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28213. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
4
Perceived impacts of a pilot agricultural livelihood and microfinance intervention on agricultural practices, food security and nutrition for Kenyans living with HIV.肯尼亚艾滋病毒感染者对农业生计和小额供资试点干预措施的感知影响对农业做法、粮食安全和营养的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 14;17(12):e0278227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278227. eCollection 2022.
5
An evaluation of nutrition, culinary, and production interventions using African indigenous vegetables on nutrition security among smallholder farmers in Western Kenya.对肯尼亚西部小农户采用非洲本土蔬菜的营养、烹饪和生产干预措施对营养安全影响的评估。
Front Nutr. 2023 May 15;10:1154423. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1154423. eCollection 2023.
6
A Nutrition-Sensitive Agroecology Intervention in Rural Tanzania Increases Children's Dietary Diversity and Household Food Security But Does Not Change Child Anthropometry: Results from a Cluster-Randomized Trial.坦桑尼亚农村地区的营养敏感型农业生态学干预措施增加了儿童的饮食多样性和家庭粮食安全,但并未改变儿童的人体测量指标:一项集群随机试验的结果。
J Nutr. 2021 Jul 1;151(7):2010-2021. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab052.
7
Influence of Small-Scale Irrigation on Livelihoods of Rural Farm Households in the Case of Legehida District, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚莱盖希达地区小规模灌溉对农村农户生计的影响。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 May 23;2024:9982796. doi: 10.1155/2024/9982796. eCollection 2024.
8
Community-level interventions for improving access to food in low- and middle-income countries.在低收入和中等收入国家改善食品获取途径的社区层面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 28;7(7):CD011504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011504.pub2.
9
Community-level interventions for improving access to food in low- and middle-income countries.中低收入国家改善粮食获取途径的社区层面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 5;8(8):CD011504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011504.pub3.
10
Impact of Livelihood Diversification on Rural Households' Food and Nutrition Security: Evidence from West Shoa Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia.生计多样化对农村家庭粮食与营养安全的影响:来自埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州西绍阿地区的证据
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Dec 10;9(1):104521. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104521. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of new measures to assess household nutrition security, and choice in dietary characteristics.开发新的家庭营养安全评估指标,以及膳食特征的选择。
Appetite. 2022 Dec 1;179:106288. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106288. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Unlocking the potential for achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goal 2 - 'Zero Hunger' - in Africa: targets, strategies, synergies and challenges.挖掘在非洲实现联合国可持续发展目标2——“零饥饿”的潜力:目标、战略、协同作用及挑战
Food Nutr Res. 2021 May 26;65. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7686. eCollection 2021.
3
The Broader Economic Value of School Feeding Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Estimating the Multi-Sectoral Returns to Public Health, Human Capital, Social Protection, and the Local Economy.
发展中国家学校供餐计划的更广泛经济价值:估算公共卫生、人力资本、社会保护和地方经济的多部门回报。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 3;8:587046. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.587046. eCollection 2020.
4
Conceptualising COVID-19's impacts on household food security.新冠疫情对家庭粮食安全影响的概念化
Food Secur. 2020;12(4):769-772. doi: 10.1007/s12571-020-01085-0. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Global food and nutrition security needs more and new science.全球粮食和营养安全需要更多新的科学。
Sci Adv. 2019 Dec 13;5(12):eaba2946. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba2946. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Can Integrated Agriculture-Nutrition Programmes Change Gender Norms on Land and Asset Ownership? Evidence from Burkina Faso.综合农业营养计划能否改变土地和资产所有权方面的性别规范?来自布基纳法索的证据。
J Dev Stud. 2015 Aug 27;51(9):1155-1174. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1036036. eCollection 2015.
7
Ethics in Psychiatric Research: Issues and Recommendations.精神科研究中的伦理:问题与建议。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2017 Sep-Oct;39(5):558-565. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_131_17.
8
Agriculture and Nutrition in Bangladesh: Mapping Evidence to Pathways.孟加拉国的农业与营养:将证据映射到路径
Food Nutr Bull. 2015 Dec;36(4):387-404. doi: 10.1177/0379572115609195. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
9
Scaling up impact on nutrition: what will it take?扩大对营养的影响:需要采取什么措施?
Adv Nutr. 2015 Jul 15;6(4):440-51. doi: 10.3945/an.115.008276. Print 2015 Jul.
10
Impacts of agriculture on nutrition: nature of the evidence and research gaps.农业对营养的影响:证据的性质与研究差距。
Food Nutr Bull. 2014 Mar;35(1):126-32. doi: 10.1177/156482651403500113.