Cahill Thomas Philip, Withey Samuel Joseph, Hazell Steve, Cahill Declan, Kinsella Netty
School of Medicine University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Department of Urology The Royal Marsden Hospital London UK.
BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 20;6(1):e478. doi: 10.1002/bco2.478. eCollection 2025 Jan.
To understand whether bladder outflow obstruction influences the association between traditional clinical predictive factors, particularly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This will help facilitate effective and evidence-based triaging of patients in rapid-access clinics.
We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from 307 suspected prostate cancer patients who underwent diagnostic biopsy from 2019 to 2023 at a single, high-volume, specialist cancer centre. Uroflowmetry testing generated two cohorts: patients with bladder outflow obstruction and non-obstructed patients. The cohort characteristics between the groups were compared and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associations between clinical predictive factors (age, PSA density, ethnicity, family history, digital rectal examination, urinary symptom severity and magnetic resonance imaging using the PI-RADS scoring system) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on biopsy (defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade of greater than or equal to two).
The obstructed group ( = 80) had significantly larger prostates and worse symptom severity ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the other predictive factors or csPCa compared to the non-obstructed ( = 227) cohort. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed age, PSA density, an abnormal digital rectal examination and scoring PI-RADS 4-5 on magnetic resonance imaging were all significantly associated with csPCa in the non-obstructed cohort ( < 0.05). Contrastingly, only symptom severity and scoring PI-RADS 5 were significantly associated with csPCa for the obstructed patients ( < 0.05).
In the presence of bladder outflow obstruction, traditional predictive variables such as age, PSA density, digital rectal examination and scoring PI-RADS 4 are not associated with csPCa. This study suggests that using these predictive variables to triage patients in rapid-access clinics with a patient who has bladder outflow obstruction could lead to the overuse of invasive biopsy.
了解膀胱出口梗阻是否会影响传统临床预测因素之间的关联,尤其是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度与临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)之间的关联。这将有助于在快速就诊诊所对患者进行有效且基于证据的分流。
我们回顾性分析了2019年至2023年在一家大型专科癌症中心对307例疑似前列腺癌患者进行诊断性活检时前瞻性收集的数据。尿流率检测产生了两个队列:膀胱出口梗阻患者和非梗阻患者。比较了两组之间的队列特征,并进行了逻辑回归分析,以评估临床预测因素(年龄、PSA密度、种族、家族史、直肠指检、尿路症状严重程度以及使用PI-RADS评分系统的磁共振成像)与活检时临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)(定义为泌尿病理学会分级大于或等于二级)之间的关联。
梗阻组(n = 80)的前列腺明显更大,症状严重程度更差(P < 0.05)。与非梗阻组(n = 227)相比,其他预测因素或csPCa之间没有显著差异。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,年龄、PSA密度、直肠指检异常以及磁共振成像PI-RADS评分4 - 5在非梗阻队列中均与csPCa显著相关(P < 0.05)。相比之下,对于梗阻患者,只有症状严重程度和PI-RADS评分5与csPCa显著相关(P < 0.05)。
在存在膀胱出口梗阻的情况下,年龄、PSA密度、直肠指检和PI-RADS评分4等传统预测变量与csPCa无关。本研究表明,在快速就诊诊所中,使用这些预测变量对有膀胱出口梗阻的患者进行分流可能会导致侵入性活检的过度使用。