Harley Frances, Ruseckaite Rasa, Fong Eva, Yao Henry Han-I, Hashim Hashim, O'Connell Helen E
Department of Surgery University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
BJUI Compass. 2024 Nov 20;6(1):e467. doi: 10.1002/bco2.467. eCollection 2025 Jan.
This study aims to define criteria for robotic reconstructive and functional urology credentialing using expert consensus. A recent narrative review identified a lack of standardised minimal requirements for performing robotic-assisted surgery procedures. The substantial variability or absence of a standardised curriculum and credentialing process within a highly specialised surgical field is often insufficient to guarantee surgeon proficiency and could potentially jeopardise patient safety.
Thirty-five international robotic surgery experts in urology and urogynaecology, selected based on surgical and research expertise, were invited to participate as expert panellists. Using a modified Delphi process the experts were asked to indicate their agreement with the proposed list of recommendations that was identified from the literature and review of relevant international credentialing policies in three electronic survey rounds.
Fourteen experts participated in round 1 of online surveys, 9 in round 2 and 13 in round 3. From 50 statements presented to the Delphi panel in round 1, a total of 39 recommendations (32 from round 1, 4 from round 2 and 3 from round 3) with median importance (MI) ≥ 7 and disagreement index (DI) < 1 were proposed for inclusion into the final draft set and were reviewed by the project team. Panellists agreed reconstructive and functional urology required its own specific modular training curriculum as the foundation for robotic training and a surgeon must have appropriate training i.e., fellowship or evidence of speciality training in functional urology.
This was the first study to develop preliminary guidelines on credentialing for robotic surgery in reconstructive and functional urology. A Delphi approach was employed to establish comprehensive credentialing criteria for robotic-assisted surgery. The consistent adoption of these criteria across institutions will foster the proficiency of robotic surgeons and has the potential to bring improvements in patient outcomes.
本研究旨在通过专家共识确定机器人重建和功能性泌尿外科认证标准。最近的一篇叙述性综述指出,在进行机器人辅助手术程序方面缺乏标准化的最低要求。在高度专业化的外科领域,标准化课程和认证过程的显著差异或缺失往往不足以保证外科医生的熟练程度,并可能危及患者安全。
根据手术和研究专业知识,邀请了35位国际泌尿外科和泌尿妇科机器人手术专家作为专家小组成员。通过改良的德尔菲法,要求专家们在三轮电子调查中表明他们对从文献和相关国际认证政策审查中确定的拟议建议清单的认同程度。
14位专家参与了第一轮在线调查,9位参与了第二轮,13位参与了第三轮。在第一轮向德尔菲小组提出的50条陈述中,总共提出了39条建议(第一轮32条,第二轮4条,第三轮3条),其中位重要性(MI)≥7且分歧指数(DI)<1,这些建议被纳入最终草案集并由项目团队进行审查。小组成员一致认为,重建和功能性泌尿外科需要有自己特定的模块化培训课程作为机器人培训的基础,并且外科医生必须接受过适当的培训,即功能性泌尿外科的 fellowship或专业培训证据。
这是第一项针对机器人重建和功能性泌尿外科手术认证制定初步指南的研究。采用德尔菲法建立了机器人辅助手术的综合认证标准。各机构一致采用这些标准将提高机器人外科医生的熟练程度,并有可能改善患者的治疗效果。