Dimova Elena D, Shortt Niamh K, Mitchell Richard J, Lekkas Peter, Pearce Jamie R, Clemens Tom L, Emslie Carol
Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Centre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2023 Nov 25;32(1):51-62. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2023.2282355. eCollection 2025.
Reducing alcohol and tobacco availability is one potential way to reduce harm from these unhealthy commodities. This study explores key stakeholders' views in relation to policy priorities and considerations for both alcohol and tobacco availability.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 stakeholders from alcohol and/or tobacco third sector organizations, government, public health and licensing in Scotland. Interviews explored their views on alcohol/tobacco availability, including its place in the policy landscape and experiences in gaining support for policies. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Stakeholders believed that alcohol and tobacco availability have not received as much policy attention as pricing and marketing. Stakeholders highlighted the importance of public support and having sufficient evidence to inform policy. Key considerations for future policies include: drawing on lessons from tobacco control policies to address alcohol availability, considering different aspects of availability (especially online availability), ensuring policies reflect their local context, considering the impact of policies on children, and managing retailers' involvement in the policy process.
This study highlights key considerations for policies to address alcohol and tobacco availability. There is a need for more research to consider retailers' views and provide greater detail on specific policy suggestions.
减少酒精和烟草的可及性是降低这些不健康商品危害的一种潜在方式。本研究探讨了关键利益相关者对于酒精和烟草可及性的政策重点及考量因素的看法。
我们对来自苏格兰酒精和/或烟草第三部门组织、政府、公共卫生及许可部门的14名利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了他们对酒精/烟草可及性的看法,包括其在政策格局中的地位以及在获取政策支持方面的经验。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。
利益相关者认为,酒精和烟草的可及性没有像定价和营销那样受到同等程度的政策关注。利益相关者强调了公众支持和有充分证据为政策提供依据的重要性。未来政策的关键考量因素包括:借鉴烟草控制政策的经验来解决酒精可及性问题,考虑可及性的不同方面(尤其是在线可及性),确保政策反映当地实际情况,考虑政策对儿童的影响,以及管理零售商在政策制定过程中的参与度。
本研究突出了应对酒精和烟草可及性政策的关键考量因素。需要开展更多研究以考虑零售商的观点,并就具体政策建议提供更详细的内容。