• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家髋部骨折登记处的谵妄与认知筛查:范围综述方案

Delirium and Cognitive Screening in National Hip Fracture Registries: Scoping Review Protocol.

作者信息

Merriman Niamh A, Penfold Rose S, Brent Louise, Hickey Pamela, Walsh Mary E, Sexton Eithne, Coughlan Tara, MacLullich Alasdair M J, Johansen Antony, Ojeda-Thies Cristina, Hall Andrew J, Blake Catherine

机构信息

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Edinburgh Delirium Research Group, Ageing and Health and Advanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2025 Jan 24;7:68. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13996.2. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13996.2
PMID:39877697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773136/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium and cognitive impairment are common in hip fracture populations and are associated with significant adverse patient outcomes. National hip fracture registries facilitate improvements in patient outcomes and care quality, such as reduced mortality and the development of specialist multidisciplinary services. However, there is substantial variation in the data collected and reported in relation to delirium and cognition, which impedes international comparison and may reduce quality of care.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to identify delirium and cognition data items currently collected by hip fracture registries internationally, to identify associated registry guidance that exists for the administration of delirium and cognitive screening tools, and report outcomes of these data items across the most recently published annual reports of identified hip fracture registries.

METHODS

This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search the following databases: Medline Ovid; Embase; CINAHL EBSCOHost. Relevant websites such as the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) will also be searched. Study selection and review will be carried out independently by two research team members, with discrepancies resolved by a third member of the research team. Data extraction and synthesis will be conducted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy and omissions by another. The scoping review findings will be informed and validated through engagement with the FFN Hip Fracture Audit Special Interest Group, who will share their knowledge, expertise, and research to achieve consensus over core aspects of the scoping review findings.

CONCLUSION

By identifying existing heterogeneity in delirium and cognitive screening tool use and administration, it is hoped that administration and specific screening tool use will become standardised to optimise comparability across countries and ensure that high quality and reliable data are included across international registry reports.

摘要

背景

谵妄和认知障碍在髋部骨折患者中很常见,并与患者的严重不良预后相关。国家髋部骨折登记处有助于改善患者预后和护理质量,如降低死亡率以及发展专科多学科服务。然而,在收集和报告的有关谵妄和认知的数据方面存在很大差异,这阻碍了国际比较,并可能降低护理质量。

目的

本范围综述旨在确定国际上髋部骨折登记处目前收集的谵妄和认知数据项,确定存在的有关谵妄和认知筛查工具管理的登记处指南,并在已识别的髋部骨折登记处最近发布的年度报告中报告这些数据项的结果。

方法

本范围综述将按照系统评价扩展版的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行。我们将搜索以下数据库:Medline Ovid;Embase;CINAHL EBSCOHost。还将搜索诸如脆性骨折网络(FFN)等相关网站。研究选择和综述将由两名研究团队成员独立进行,分歧由研究团队的第三名成员解决。数据提取和综合将由一名评审员进行,并由另一名评审员检查准确性和遗漏情况。范围综述的结果将通过与FFN髋部骨折审计特别兴趣小组的合作得到告知和验证,该小组将分享他们的知识、专业知识和研究成果,以就范围综述结果的核心方面达成共识。

结论

通过识别谵妄和认知筛查工具使用及管理中现有的异质性,希望管理和特定筛查工具的使用将实现标准化,以优化各国之间的可比性,并确保国际登记报告中包含高质量和可靠的数据。

相似文献

1
Delirium and Cognitive Screening in National Hip Fracture Registries: Scoping Review Protocol.国家髋部骨折登记处的谵妄与认知筛查:范围综述方案
HRB Open Res. 2025 Jan 24;7:68. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13996.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Development of a national stroke audit in Ireland: scoping review protocol.爱尔兰全国性中风审计的开展:范围审查方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 Mar 26;4:31. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13244.1. eCollection 2021.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.40 岁及以上成年人在初级保健中进行脆性骨折一级预防的筛查:筛查和治疗效果及可接受性以及风险预测工具准确性的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 21;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02181-w.
6
Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review.参与健康指南制定的指导意见:一项范围综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 25;20(4):e70006. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70006. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Scoping review exploring the impact of hip fracture in older adults with cognitive impairment or dementia.探讨髋部骨折对认知障碍或痴呆老年患者影响的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 27;15(4):e093893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093893.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Delirium diagnostic tools in the postoperative setting: A scoping review protocol.术后谵妄诊断工具:范围综述方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Nov;68(10):1528-1531. doi: 10.1111/aas.14486. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
10
Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review.创伤后老年人群神经认知障碍检测筛查工具的诊断测试准确性:一项系统评价方案
HRB Open Res. 2024 Sep 3;7:33. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13894.2. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Delirium and cognitive assessment in national hip fracture registries: a scoping review.国家髋部骨折登记处中的谵妄与认知评估:一项范围综述
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01246-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Prefracture Cognitive Impairment and Postoperative Delirium on Recovery after Hip Fracture Surgery.骨折前认知障碍和术后谵妄对髋部骨折手术后恢复的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Aug;25(8):104961. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Poorer outcomes in patients with early postoperative delirium: 120-day follow-up of the Delirium Reduction by Analgesia Management in Hip Fracture (DRAM-HF) study.术后早期谵妄患者的预后较差:髋部骨折(DRAM-HF)研究中通过镇痛管理降低谵妄的 120 天随访。
Australas J Ageing. 2023 Dec;42(4):736-741. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13239. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Standardization of global hip fracture audit could facilitate learning, improve quality, and guide evidence-based practice.全球髋部骨折审核的标准化可以促进学习、提高质量,并指导循证实践。
Bone Joint J. 2023 Sep 1;105-B(9):1013-1019. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B9.BJJ-2023-0281.
4
The impact of cognitive function on physical activity, physical function and quality of life in older adults following a hip fracture.认知功能对髋部骨折后老年人身体活动、身体功能和生活质量的影响。
Age Ageing. 2023 Apr 1;52(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad061.
5
Patient and hospital-level factors associated with time to surgery after hip fracture in Ireland: Analysis of national audit data 2016-2020.爱尔兰髋部骨折后手术时间相关的患者和医院层面因素:2016 - 2020年国家审计数据分析
Injury. 2023 Apr 16. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.038.
6
Developing a minimum common dataset for hip fracture audit to help countries set up national audits that can support international comparisons.制定髋关节骨折审核的最小通用数据集,以帮助各国建立能够支持国际比较的国家审核。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jun;104-B(6):721-728. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B6.BJJ-2022-0080.R1.
7
Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group.从咨询转向与知识使用者共同创作:来自 JBI 范围综述方法学小组的指导。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):969-979. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00416.
8
Lessons Learnt from a Decade of the Irish Hip Fracture Database.从爱尔兰髋部骨折数据库十年中汲取的经验教训。
Gerontology. 2022;68(8):917-919. doi: 10.1159/000521380. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
9
Is delirium associated with negative outcomes in older patients with hip fracture: analysis of the 4904 patients 2017-2018 from the Australian and New Zealand hip fracture registry.谵妄与老年髋部骨折患者的不良结局相关吗:来自澳大利亚和新西兰髋部骨折登记处 2017-2018 年的 4904 例患者分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jan;92(1-2):200-205. doi: 10.1111/ans.17421. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
10
Differences in hip fracture care in Europe: a systematic review of recent annual reports of hip fracture registries.欧洲髋部骨折护理的差异:对髋部骨折登记处近期年度报告的系统评价。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun;48(3):1625-1638. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01797-8. Epub 2021 Oct 8.