• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项非随机试点研究,旨在调查LivR Well的可接受性和可行性:一项针对慢性肝衰竭急性发作的为期28天的多方面居家肝脏优化计划。

A Nonrandomized Pilot Study to Investigate the Acceptability and Feasibility of LivR Well: A Multifaceted 28-Day Home-Based Liver Optimization Program for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.

作者信息

Ngu Natalie L Y, Saxby Edward, Worland Thomas, Anderson Patricia, Stothers Lisa, Hunter Jo, Elford Alexander T, Ha Phil, Hartley Imogen, Roberts Andrew, Seah Dean, Tambakis George, Connoley Declan, Figredo Anita, Ratnam Dilip, Liew Danny, Rogers Benjamin, Sievert William, Bell Sally, Le Suong

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Gastro Hep Adv. 2024 Oct 18;4(2):100567. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.10.007. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1016/j.gastha.2024.10.007
PMID:39877863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773469/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a 22%-74% 28-day mortality rate and 30%-40% 30-day readmission rate. We investigated the acceptability and feasibility of a multimodal community intervention for ACLF.

METHODS

A single-arm nonrandomized pilot study of consecutive participants with ACLF was conducted in a tertiary health service. Participants received weekly medical and nursing reviews, dietetics, physiotherapy, pharmacy, social work, addiction medicine, and neuropsychiatry, where indicated. A digital platform included remote weight monitoring and online surveys. The primary outcome was acceptability/feasibility. Secondary outcomes included safety, mortality, readmission, liver disease severity, and costs.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled with median age 51 years (interquartile range (IQR): 45-59); majority alcohol etiology (74%),and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score 16 (IQR: 12-21). LivR Well was acceptable with low attrition (8 of 59), adherence to the program including home visits (mean 8.4 ± 4.2) and consultations (mean 2.4 ± 1.5) per patient. This was supported by positive feedback and themes identified through a qualitative subanalysis. Feasibility was demonstrated by recruitment rate of 4.94 patients/month and 86% completion. Mortality was lower than expected at 3%, 30-day readmission rate was 15%, and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score reduced to 15 ( = .01). Median 6-month costs reduced from $30,454 (IQR: $21,953-$65,657) to $17,657 ($4249-$42,876) ( = .009). The total 6-month health-care cost was $1,868,859 (95% confidence interval 1,081,821-2,655,897) compared to $2,518,227 (95% confidence interval 1,959,610-3,076,844).

CONCLUSION

LivR Well was acceptable, feasible, and safe with low short-term mortality and readmission rates. Health-care costs were reduced by 26% driven by a 40% reduction in 30-day readmission. Further evaluation includes a randomized controlled trial of LivR Well compared to standard care.

摘要

背景与目的

慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)的28天死亡率为22%-74%,30天再入院率为30%-40%。我们调查了针对ACLF的多模式社区干预措施的可接受性和可行性。

方法

在一家三级医疗服务机构对连续入选的ACLF患者进行了单臂非随机试点研究。参与者接受每周一次的医疗和护理评估、饮食指导、物理治疗、药学、社会工作、成瘾医学以及必要时的神经精神病学服务。一个数字平台包括远程体重监测和在线调查。主要结局是可接受性/可行性。次要结局包括安全性、死亡率、再入院率、肝病严重程度和成本。

结果

共纳入59例患者,中位年龄51岁(四分位间距(IQR):45-59岁);多数病因是酒精性(74%),终末期肝病钠模型评分中位数为16(IQR:12-21)。LivR Well项目是可接受的,脱落率低(59例中有8例),患者对该项目的依从性包括家访(平均8.4±4.2次)和会诊(平均2.4±1.5次)。定性子分析确定的积极反馈和主题支持了这一点。招募率为每月4.94例患者,完成率为86%,证明了该项目的可行性。死亡率低于预期,为3%,30天再入院率为15%,终末期肝病钠模型评分中位数降至15(P = 0.01)。6个月的成本中位数从30454美元(IQR:21953-65657美元)降至17657美元(4249-42876美元)(P = 0.009)。6个月的总医疗保健成本为1868859美元(95%置信区间1081821-2655897美元),而之前为2518227美元(95%置信区间1959610-3076844美元)。

结论

LivR Well项目是可接受的、可行的且安全的,短期死亡率和再入院率较低。30天再入院率降低40%,推动医疗保健成本降低了26%。进一步评估包括将LivR Well项目与标准治疗进行随机对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/fcb58550762a/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/8c942e9fb5b1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/2503a38a82f3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/0a7f4e60fea4/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/fcb58550762a/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/8c942e9fb5b1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/2503a38a82f3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/0a7f4e60fea4/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/11773469/fcb58550762a/figs1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Nonrandomized Pilot Study to Investigate the Acceptability and Feasibility of LivR Well: A Multifaceted 28-Day Home-Based Liver Optimization Program for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.一项非随机试点研究,旨在调查LivR Well的可接受性和可行性:一项针对慢性肝衰竭急性发作的为期28天的多方面居家肝脏优化计划。
Gastro Hep Adv. 2024 Oct 18;4(2):100567. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.10.007. eCollection 2025.
2
A home-based, multidisciplinary liver optimisation programme for the first 28 days after an admission for acute-on-chronic liver failure (LivR well): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对急性加重期慢性肝衰竭患者入院后 28 天内的家庭为基础的多学科肝脏优化方案(LivR well):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 5;23(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06679-x.
3
Gait Rehabilitation for Early rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (GREAT): lessons learnt from a mixed-methods feasibility study and internal pilot trial.早期类风湿性关节炎步态康复试验(GREAT):来自混合方法可行性研究和内部预试验的经验教训
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Mar 26:1-48. doi: 10.3310/XBDJ8546.
4
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Combined Digital Platform and Community Health Worker Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.心力衰竭患者数字平台与社区卫生工作者联合干预的可行性、可接受性及初步有效性:试点随机对照试验
JMIR Cardio. 2024 Aug 8;8:e59948. doi: 10.2196/59948.
5
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Combined Digital Platform and Community Health Worker Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure: Single-Arm Pilot Study.心力衰竭患者数字平台与社区卫生工作者联合干预的可行性与可接受性:单臂试点研究
JMIR Cardio. 2023 Oct 2;7:e47818. doi: 10.2196/47818.
6
Enhancing Quadruple Health Outcomes After Thoracic Surgery: Feasibility Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Using Digital Home Monitoring.提高胸外科手术后的四重健康结局:使用数字家庭监测的可行性试点随机对照试验
JMIR Perioper Med. 2025 Feb 12;8:e58998. doi: 10.2196/58998.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Combined Digital Platform and Community Health Worker Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.数字平台与社区卫生工作者联合干预对心力衰竭患者的可行性、可接受性及初步有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 6;13:e55687. doi: 10.2196/55687.
9
Model for end-stage liver disease-sodium underestimates 90-day mortality risk in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.终末期肝病模型-钠低估了慢加急性肝衰竭患者 90 天的死亡率风险。
J Hepatol. 2020 Dec;73(6):1425-1433. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
User Engagement, Acceptability, and Clinical Markers in a Digital Health Program for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Prospective, Single-Arm Feasibility Study.非酒精性脂肪性肝病数字健康项目中的用户参与度、可接受性及临床指标:前瞻性单臂可行性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2024 Feb 15;8:e52576. doi: 10.2196/52576.

本文引用的文献

1
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on acute-on-chronic liver failure.欧洲肝脏研究学会急性肝衰竭临床实践指南。
J Hepatol. 2023 Aug;79(2):461-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
2
Validation of the CLIF-C OF Score and CLIF-C ACLF Score to Predict Transplant-Free Survival in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Concomitant Need for Intensive Care Unit Treatment.CLIF-C OF 评分和 CLIF-C ACLF 评分对合并需要重症监护治疗的肝硬化患者无肝移植生存率的预测价值。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 29;59(5):866. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050866.
3
Rate of early hospital readmission amongst cirrhotic patients is high in Australia: experience from a single liver transplant centre.
在澳大利亚,肝硬化患者的早期住院再入院率较高:来自单个肝移植中心的经验。
Intern Med J. 2022 Dec;52(12):2086-2095. doi: 10.1111/imj.15932. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Nationwide analysis of incidence and predictors of 30-day readmissions in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.失代偿期肝硬化患者30天再入院率及预测因素的全国性分析。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 2;13(4):295-302. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101850. eCollection 2022.
5
Frailty and Sarcopenia in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.慢性肝衰竭急性发作中的衰弱与肌少症
Hepatol Commun. 2021 May 4;5(8):1333-1347. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1722. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间远程肝脏病学服务的可行性、结果和安全性。
Hepatol Commun. 2022 Jan;6(1):65-76. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1732. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
7
Adopt, adapt, or abandon technology-supported person-centred care initiatives: healthcare providers' beliefs matter.采用、调整或摒弃技术支持的以人为本的护理举措:医疗服务提供者的信念至关重要。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06262-1.
8
Home ward bound: features of hospital in the home use by major Australian hospitals, 2011-2017.居家康复:2011-2017 年主要澳大利亚医院使用的家庭医院特点。
Med J Aust. 2020 Jul;213(1):22-27. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50599. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
Thirty-Day Readmission and Cost Analysis in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Population-Based Data.肝硬化患者30天再入院情况及费用分析:一项基于全国人口的数据研究
Hepatol Commun. 2020 Jan 21;4(3):453-460. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1472. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Changing prevalence of aetiological factors and comorbidities among Australians hospitalised for cirrhosis.澳大利亚因肝硬化住院患者病因因素和合并症的流行率变化。
Intern Med J. 2021 May;51(5):691-698. doi: 10.1111/imj.14809.