Suppr超能文献

全科医生工作方式的改变如何影响社区护士:一项定性研究。

How changes in GPs' ways of working have affected community nurses: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Polak Louisa, Pollock Kristian, Barclay Stephen, Bowers Ben

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2025 May 29;75(755):e406-e411. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0534. Print 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing literature examines the way two changes in primary care - the shift towards remote working and the diversification of practice teams to incorporate, for instance, physician associates and paramedics - affect patient care within the practice. However, little is known about the effect of these changes on community nurses.

AIM

To explore community nurses' experiences of delivering palliative care in the context of GPs' new ways of working.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative study using focus groups in the UK.

METHOD

Focus groups were conducted on Zoom with community nurses. Data were analysed thematically using constant comparison.

RESULTS

Community nurses described extending their roles in palliative care. Alongside pride and satisfaction about this, participants raised several areas of concern and dissatisfaction, some of which they associated with changes in GPs' ways of working. Two reasons for dissatisfaction concerned remote working. First, remote communication with colleagues was seen as creating obstacles to nurses' everyday collaboration with GPs, damaging important working relationships. Second, nurses increased their workload by taking the lead in person-centred care where they saw remote provision by GPs as unsatisfactory. Where workforce diversification led to delegating home visits to paramedics or nurse practitioners, community nurses described feeling a lack of the 'GP back-up' that many identified as essential for community palliative care.

CONCLUSION

When considering and evaluating interventions that change the way GPs work, policymakers and commissioners should look not only at consequences that affect primary care teams, but also at the effects across the complex ecosystem within which these teams operate.

摘要

背景

越来越多的文献探讨了基层医疗中的两个变化——向远程工作的转变以及实践团队的多元化,例如纳入医师助理和护理人员——如何影响诊所内的患者护理。然而,对于这些变化对社区护士的影响却知之甚少。

目的

探讨社区护士在全科医生新工作方式背景下提供姑息治疗的经历。

设计与背景

在英国进行的一项使用焦点小组的定性研究。

方法

通过Zoom与社区护士进行焦点小组讨论。使用持续比较法对数据进行主题分析。

结果

社区护士描述了他们在姑息治疗中角色的扩展。除了对此感到自豪和满意之外,参与者还提出了几个令人担忧和不满的领域,其中一些他们将其与全科医生工作方式的变化联系起来。不满的两个原因与远程工作有关。首先,与同事的远程沟通被视为给护士与全科医生的日常协作造成障碍,损害了重要的工作关系。其次,护士在以患者为中心的护理方面发挥带头作用,从而增加了工作量,因为他们认为全科医生的远程服务不尽人意。当劳动力多元化导致将家访工作委托给护理人员或执业护士时,社区护士表示感到缺乏许多人认为对社区姑息治疗至关重要的“全科医生支持”。

结论

在考虑和评估改变全科医生工作方式的干预措施时,政策制定者和决策者不仅应关注影响基层医疗团队的后果,还应关注这些团队运作的复杂生态系统中的影响。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验