• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Preoperative Evaluation of Oswestry Disability Index in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: New Evidence of Time Independence of Variation Up to 1 Year.腰椎管狭窄症患者术前Oswestry功能障碍指数评估:长达1年变化的时间独立性新证据
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):110-116. doi: 10.14444/8699.
2
Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.腰椎手术后3个月的奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数结果不足以评估个体患者的长期体验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):170-80. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.SPINE15872. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
3
Differentiation of pain-related functional limitations in surgical patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using the Oswestry Disability Index: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) study.使用奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数区分腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)手术患者与疼痛相关的功能受限:一项加拿大脊柱结局与研究网络(CSORN)的研究。
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):578-586. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
4
Reassessing the minimum 2-year follow-up standard after lumbar decompression surgery: a 2-month follow-up seems to be an acceptable minimum.重新评估腰椎减压手术后的最低 2 年随访标准:2 个月的随访似乎是可以接受的最低标准。
Spine J. 2024 Jul;24(7):1244-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
5
Redefining Oswestry Disability Index success criteria to assess the effect of consecutive surgeries on lumbar spinal stenosis.重新定义奥斯威斯利残疾指数成功标准以评估连续手术对腰椎管狭窄症的影响。
Spine J. 2024 Dec;24(12):2305-2313. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.028. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
6
Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.腰椎管狭窄症的放射学严重程度与残疾、疼痛或手术结果之间存在关联吗?一项多中心观察性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(2):E78-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001166.
7
The Effects of Marijuana Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion.大麻使用对腰椎融合的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):629-634. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003321.
8
Definitions of unfavorable surgical outcomes and their risk factors based on disability score after spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.基于腰椎管狭窄症脊柱手术后残疾评分的不良手术结局定义及其危险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 May 8;21(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03323-0.
9
Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的心理和功能比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(4):1213-1226. doi: 10.1111/os.12986. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.来自质量结果数据库的分析,第1部分。腰椎手术后的残疾、生活质量和疼痛结果:为共同决策预测可能的个体患者结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):357-369. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16526. Epub 2017 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Repeated Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Necessary Before Planned Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?对于腰椎管狭窄症的计划性减压手术,术前重复进行磁共振成像有必要吗?
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):449-453. doi: 10.14444/8469. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄减压术中常用患者报告结局工具的结构效度和反应度
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan 13;16:125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.01.002. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Rational Selection of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients.腰椎手术患者中患者报告结局指标的合理选择
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Jun 30;14(3):347-354. doi: 10.14444/7046. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data.退行性腰椎脊柱手术的随访-PROMs 在 1 年后趋于稳定:基于 Swespine 数据的等效性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):2187-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05989-0. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
The association between tobacco smoking and surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis: cohort study of 331,941 workers.吸烟与腰椎管狭窄症手术干预的相关性:331941 名工人的队列研究。
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1313-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
6
The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: an evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients.患者整体评估在腰椎手术中的价值:基于9万多名患者的评估
Eur Spine J. 2018 Mar;27(3):554-563. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5331-0. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
7
Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and psychosocial factors: a multicenter cross-sectional study (DISTO project).腰椎管狭窄症与社会心理因素的关系:一项多中心横断面研究(DISTO项目)
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2288-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4002-2. Epub 2015 May 14.
8
Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and lifestyle-related disorders: a cross-sectional multicenter observational study.腰椎管狭窄症与生活方式相关疾病的关系:一项横断面多中心观察性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 20;38(9):E540-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828a2517.
9
Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial.腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗的长期结果:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jul;20(7):1174-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1652-y. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
10
Smokers show less improvement than nonsmokers two years after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study of 4555 patients from the Swedish spine register.吸烟者在腰椎管狭窄症手术后两年的改善程度不如不吸烟者:来自瑞典脊柱登记处的 4555 名患者的研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):1059-64. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92b36.

腰椎管狭窄症患者术前Oswestry功能障碍指数评估:长达1年变化的时间独立性新证据

Preoperative Evaluation of Oswestry Disability Index in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: New Evidence of Time Independence of Variation Up to 1 Year.

作者信息

Hatakka Juho, Pernaa Katri, Kostensalo Joel, Mäkelä Keijo, Laaksonen Inari

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Natural Resources Institute Finland, Natural Resources, Joensuu, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):110-116. doi: 10.14444/8699.

DOI:10.14444/8699
PMID:39880684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12053121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a well-validated and widely used patient-reported outcome instrument to evaluate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients' treatment outcomes. The objective of the present study was to determine long the average interval between 2 preoperative measurements can be before a clinically significant difference of 10 points or more might appear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study utilizing prospectively collected data from a single university hospital database, which was compatible with the national registry. One hundred and four surgically treated LSS patients were included in this observational study using systematic sampling. The preoperative ODI score was obtained at 2 timepoints. The 2-month mark as a potential turning point was of special interest, as the registry in question excludes preoperative data as outdated if the data are older than 2 months. Possible time dependence of the change in ODI scores was explored using a linear mixed-effects model with ODI as the dependent variable and interval length, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and the presence of a concomitant disease as fixed effects.

RESULTS

The mean ODI score was 41.7 points (SD = 16.0) at the first and 41.1 points (SD = 15.5) at the second measurement. Mean time between the ODI scores was 74 days (range 8-361). On average, ODI changed by 9.17 points (SD = 7.16) between the 2 measurements, increasing for 48 patients, remaining unchanged for 9 patients, and decreasing for 47 patients. The arithmetic mean of the changes was -0.60 points and the median was 0.00 points. The estimated change in the population mean was -0.0005 points/day (95% CI [-0.022, 0.022], = 0.97), meaning that we have strong evidence that the change in the mean is not clinically significant for up to 15 months (95% CI between ±10 points). Furthermore, no evidence was found that age, sex, BMI, or concomitant diseases were associated with the change of ODI score over time. Furthermore, the probability to observe a clinically significant change in a patient did not depend on the number of days between the 2 measurements (OR 1.003, 95% CI [0.997, 1.010], = 0.30). Variance in ODI change did not grow over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of observing a clinically significant differences does not depend on the length of the observation interval, and ODI scores can be considered equally reliable for a significantly longer time than 2 months, even up to 1 year.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Preoperative ODI scores do not lose reliability up to 1 year in patients undergoing operatively treatment for LSS.

摘要

背景

奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)是一种经过充分验证且广泛应用的患者报告结局工具,用于评估腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的治疗效果。本研究的目的是确定两次术前测量之间的平均间隔时间可以延长到多久,才可能出现10分或更高的具有临床意义的差异。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性研究,利用从单一大学医院数据库前瞻性收集的数据,该数据库与国家登记处兼容。采用系统抽样方法,104例接受手术治疗的LSS患者被纳入本观察性研究。在两个时间点获取术前ODI评分。将2个月标记作为一个潜在的转折点特别受关注,因为所讨论的登记处如果术前数据超过2个月则将其作为过时数据排除。使用以ODI为因变量、间隔长度、性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)和合并疾病的存在作为固定效应的线性混合效应模型,探讨ODI评分变化可能的时间依赖性。

结果

第一次测量时ODI平均评分为41.7分(标准差=16.0),第二次测量时为41.1分(标准差=15.5)。两次ODI评分之间的平均时间为74天(范围8 - 361天)。两次测量之间,ODI平均变化9.17分(标准差=7.16),48例患者升高,9例患者不变,47例患者降低。变化的算术平均值为-0.60分,中位数为0.00分。总体均值的估计变化为-0.0005分/天(95%置信区间[-0.022, 0.022],P = 0.97),这意味着我们有充分证据表明,在长达15个月(95%置信区间在±10分之间)内,均值变化无临床意义。此外,未发现年龄、性别、BMI或合并疾病与ODI评分随时间的变化相关。此外,观察到患者出现具有临床意义变化的概率不取决于两次测量之间的天数(比值比1.003,95%置信区间[0.997, 1.010],P = 0.30)。ODI变化的方差不随时间增加。

结论

观察到具有临床意义差异的概率不取决于观察间隔的长度,并且ODI评分在超过2个月甚至长达一年的显著更长时间内都可被认为具有同等可靠性。

临床意义

对于接受LSS手术治疗的患者,术前ODI评分在长达1年的时间内不会失去可靠性。