• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial.腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗的长期结果:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jul;20(7):1174-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1652-y. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
2
Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗?一项随机对照试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 1;32(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.双侧椎板切开术或全椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的长期临床疗效:单中心经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18651.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.腰椎管狭窄症伴退变性不稳定性患者后路横突间融合与后路腰椎间融合的临床疗效比较。
Pain Physician. 2018 Jul;21(4):383-406.
5
Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.采用“起立-行走计时测试”评估腰椎椎管狭窄症患者的功能。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E4. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18618.
6
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Long-term results after undercutting decompression compared with decompressive laminectomy alone or with instrumented fusion.退行性腰椎管狭窄症。与单纯减压性椎板切除术或器械辅助融合术相比,潜行减压术后的长期疗效。
Neurosurg Rev. 1999 Oct;22(2-3):102-6. doi: 10.1007/s101430050040.
7
MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.MILD®是治疗神经源性间歇性跛行型腰椎管狭窄症的有效方法:MiDAS ENCORE随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):229-42.
8
[Outcomes and Complications of Surgical Treatment for LSS at 1-Year Follow-up - Prospective Study].[腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗1年随访结果及并发症 - 前瞻性研究]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(4):256-263.
9
Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.肥胖对并发症及手术结果的影响:融合与非融合腰椎手术的比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):158-162. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.SPINE16448. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
10
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.

引用本文的文献

1
The safety and effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的安全性和有效性。
Front Surg. 2025 May 13;12:1598531. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1598531. eCollection 2025.
2
Preoperative Evaluation of Oswestry Disability Index in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: New Evidence of Time Independence of Variation Up to 1 Year.腰椎管狭窄症患者术前Oswestry功能障碍指数评估:长达1年变化的时间独立性新证据
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):110-116. doi: 10.14444/8699.
3
The Finnish spine register (FinSpine): development, design, validation and utility.芬兰脊柱注册研究(FinSpine):研发、设计、验证和应用。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Nov;32(11):3731-3743. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07874-3. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
4
Validity of outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症随机临床试验和观察性研究的结局测量的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):1068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27218-3.
5
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment: Is Surgery Better than Non-Surgical Treatments in Afro-Descendant Populations?腰椎管狭窄症的治疗:在非洲裔人群中,手术治疗是否优于非手术治疗?
Biomedicines. 2022 Dec 6;10(12):3144. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123144.
6
The Effectiveness of Pharmacopuncture in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Protocol for a Multi-Centered, Pragmatic, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Group Study.药针疗法对腰椎管狭窄症患者的有效性:一项多中心、实用、随机、对照、平行组研究方案
J Pain Res. 2022 Sep 23;15:2989-2996. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S382550. eCollection 2022.
7
Concomitant back and leg pain as predictors for trajectories of poor outcome after single level lumbar micro-decompression alone and with micro-discectomy: a study of 3,308 patients.单纯单节段腰椎微减压术及联合微椎间盘切除术时,同时存在的背部和腿部疼痛作为预后不良轨迹的预测因素:一项对3308例患者的研究
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):688-702. doi: 10.21037/jss-19-462.
8
National trends in lumbar spine decompression and fusion surgery in Finland, 1997-2018.芬兰腰椎减压融合手术的全国趋势,1997-2018 年。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Apr;92(2):199-203. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1839244. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
9
Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign: Can It Predict the Success for Surgical Intervention in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?神经根沉降征:它能预测有症状的腰椎管狭窄症患者手术干预的成功率吗?
Cureus. 2020 Aug 17;12(8):e9803. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9803.
10
The 100 Most Cited Articles on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis.关于腰椎管狭窄症的100篇被引用次数最多的文章:一项文献计量分析。
Global Spine J. 2022 Apr;12(3):381-391. doi: 10.1177/2192568220952074. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.腰椎退行性滑脱症手术治疗与非手术治疗的比较:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)随机分组及观察队列的四年结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jun;91(6):1295-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00913.
2
Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline.下腰痛的手术治疗:美国疼痛学会临床实践指南的证据综述
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 1;34(10):1094-109. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc.
3
Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and one year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症手术前后的健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D)。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Feb;91(2):210-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21119.
4
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings.腰椎:磁共振成像结果的可靠性
Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):161-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493071999. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
5
Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):794-810. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136.
6
The relationship between the cross-sectional area of the cauda equina and the preoperative symptoms in central lumbar spinal stenosis.马尾神经横截面积与中央型腰椎管狭窄症术前症状之间的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):1423-8; discussion 1429. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060a5f5.
7
Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.腰椎退行性滑脱的手术治疗与非手术治疗
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2257-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070302.
8
Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗?一项随机对照试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 1;32(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d.
9
Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis.脊柱狭窄的放射学征象与临床症状比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 15;31(16):1834-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000227370.65573.ac.
10
United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions.美国退行性疾病腰椎融合手术的趋势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1441-5; discussion 1446-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a.

腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗的长期结果:一项随机对照试验。

Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

ORTON Orthopaedic Hospital, Invalid Foundation, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2011 Jul;20(7):1174-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1652-y. Epub 2011 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-010-1652-y
PMID:21240530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3175822/
Abstract

We randomised a total of 94 patients with long-standing moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) into a surgical group and a non-operative group, with 50 and 44 patients, respectively. The operative treatment comprised undercutting laminectomy of stenotic segments, augmented with transpedicular-instrumented fusion in suspected lumbar instability. The primary outcome was the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the other main outcomes included assessments of leg and back pain and self-reported walking ability, all based on questionnaire data from 85 patients at the 6-year follow-up. At the 6-year follow-up, the mean difference in ODI in favour of surgery was 9.5 (95% confidence interval 0.9-18.1, P-value for global difference 0.006), whereas the intensity of leg or back pain did not differ between the two treatment groups any longer. Walking ability did not differ between the treatment groups at any time. Decompressive surgery of LSS provided modest but consistent improvement in functional ability, surpassing that obtained after non-operative measures.

摘要

我们将 94 例患有长期中度腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的患者随机分为手术组和非手术组,每组 50 例和 44 例。手术治疗包括狭窄节段的咬骨减压术,如果怀疑腰椎不稳定,则进行经椎弓根器械固定融合术。主要结局是 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI),其他主要结局包括腿部和背部疼痛评估以及自我报告的步行能力,所有这些均基于 85 例患者在 6 年随访时的问卷调查数据。在 6 年随访时,手术组在 ODI 方面的平均差异为 9.5(95%置信区间为 0.9-18.1,P 值为全球差异 0.006),而两组间腿部或背部疼痛的强度不再有差异。在任何时候,两组患者的步行能力均无差异。LSS 的减压手术可适度但持续地改善功能能力,超过非手术治疗措施的效果。