• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国青少年中的同伴欺凌与学校参与度:班级层面的欺凌行为重要吗?

Peer Victimization and School Engagement among Chinese Adolescents: Does Classroom-Level Victimization Matter?

作者信息

Ye Zhi, Wu Kehui, Niu Li, Li Yan, Chen Zhengge, Chen Lihua, Zhao Shan

机构信息

Laboratory of Public Safety Risk Governance, Zhejiang Police College, Hangzhou, China.

School of Marxism, Zhejiang Police College, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02150-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-025-02150-7
PMID:39881122
Abstract

Peer victimization has been demonstrated to have a long-lasting negative impact on adolescents' psychological well-being, yet its impact on school engagement is inconclusive, particularly during high school. In addition, research about the role of classroom-level victimization in the association between individual-level peer victimization and adolescents' school engagement remains underexplored. Previous research has relied solely on self-report measures to assess peer victimization, potentially limiting the scope of understanding. This study investigated the moderating effects of both student-reported and teacher-reported classroom-level victimization on the association between individual-level peer victimization and school engagement among Chinese adolescents. A sample of 2,803 high school students (aged from 14-19 years, M = 15.43 years, SD = 0.56; 48.5% boys) from 48 classes (M = 58.62, SD = 3.65) completed measures of peer victimization and school engagement in October 2023. Their homeroom teachers (85.4% males; M = 44.17 years, SD = 7.70) reported overall victimization in each class. Multilevel modeling analyses revealed that, at the individual level, adolescents who reported higher victimization exhibited lower school engagement. Notably, this association was significant only when the classroom-level victimization was high. Furthermore, these significant findings were observed for student-reported classroom-level victimization, but not for teacher-reported victimization. The findings suggest that reducing classroom-level victimization may help mitigate the negative effect of peer victimization on school engagement, underscoring the need to consider classroom environment when developing anti-bullying interventions for high school students.

摘要

同伴侵害已被证明会对青少年的心理健康产生长期负面影响,但其对学校参与度的影响尚无定论,尤其是在高中阶段。此外,关于班级层面的侵害行为在个体层面的同伴侵害与青少年学校参与度之间的关联中所起的作用,相关研究仍未得到充分探索。以往的研究仅依靠自我报告量表来评估同伴侵害,这可能限制了理解的范围。本研究调查了学生报告和教师报告的班级层面侵害行为对中国青少年个体层面同伴侵害与学校参与度之间关联的调节作用。2023年10月,来自48个班级(M = 58.62,SD = 3.65)的2803名高中生(年龄在14 - 19岁之间,M = 15.43岁,SD = 0.56;48.5%为男生)完成了同伴侵害和学校参与度的测量。他们的班主任(85.4%为男性;M = 44.17岁,SD = 7.70)报告了每个班级的总体侵害情况。多层次建模分析显示,在个体层面,报告遭受更高侵害的青少年表现出较低的学校参与度。值得注意的是,只有当班级层面的侵害行为程度较高时,这种关联才显著。此外,这些显著发现仅在学生报告的班级层面侵害行为中观察到,而在教师报告的侵害行为中未观察到。研究结果表明,减少班级层面的侵害行为可能有助于减轻同伴侵害对学校参与度的负面影响,这突出了在为高中生制定反欺凌干预措施时考虑班级环境的必要性。

相似文献

1
Peer Victimization and School Engagement among Chinese Adolescents: Does Classroom-Level Victimization Matter?中国青少年中的同伴欺凌与学校参与度:班级层面的欺凌行为重要吗?
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02150-7.
2
Associations between peer victimization, perceived teacher unfairness, and adolescents' adjustment and well-being.同伴侵害、感知到的教师不公正与青少年的适应和幸福感之间的关系。
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Apr;67:56-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
3
Peer Victimization and Adolescent Mental Health: School-level Victimization as a Moderator.同伴侵害与青少年心理健康:以学校层面的侵害作为调节变量。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Nov;39(21-22):4647-4666. doi: 10.1177/08862605241244473. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Forms of Peer Victimization and School Adjustment Among Japanese Adolescents: A Multilevel Analysis.日本青少年同伴侵害形式与学校适应:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Jun;53(6):1441-1453. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-01967-y. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
5
Student-, classroom-, and school-level risk factors for victimization.学生层面、课堂层面和学校层面的受害风险因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Jun;51(3):421-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
6
Teacher victimization by students in China: A multilevel analysis.教师在中国遭学生欺凌:多层次分析。
Aggress Behav. 2019 Mar;45(2):169-180. doi: 10.1002/ab.21806. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
7
Teacher characteristics and peer victimization in elementary schools: a classroom-level perspective.小学教师特征与同伴欺凌:课堂层面的视角
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):33-44. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9847-4.
8
Daily school peer victimization experiences among Mexican-American adolescents: associations with psychosocial, physical and school adjustment.墨西哥裔美国青少年的日常校园同伴侵害经历:与心理社会、身体和学校适应的关联。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Dec;42(12):1775-88. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9874-4. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
9
Teachers victimizing students: Contributions of student-to-teacher victimization, peer victimization, school safety, and school climate in Chile.教师对学生的伤害:智利学生对教师的伤害、同伴伤害、学校安全和学校氛围的影响。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(4):432-444. doi: 10.1037/ort0000445. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
10
Reducing bullying and victimization: student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change.减少欺凌与受欺负现象:学生及班级层面的改变机制
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):61-76. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9841-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal study of peer victimization, social support, and mental health during early adolescence.青少年早期同伴侵害、社会支持与心理健康的纵向研究。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jul;54(9):1940-1955. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000035. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
2
Students' School and Psychological Adjustment in Classrooms with Positive and Negative Leaders.学生在积极和消极领导者的课堂中的学校和心理调整。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Mar;53(3):550-562. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01937-w. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
3
Social Anxiety and Peer Victimization and Aggression: Examining Reciprocal Trait-State Effects among Early Adolescents.
社交焦虑与同伴侵害和攻击:考察青少年早期的特质-状态互惠效应。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Mar;53(3):701-717. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01920-5. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Relational Peer Victimization as a Predictor of Academic Engagement.关系型同伴侵害作为学业参与度的预测指标
J Child Fam Stud. 2023 Jul;32(7):1882-1894. doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02470-3. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
5
The Roles of Clique Status Hierarchy and Aggression Norms in Victimized Adolescents' Aggressive Behavior.群体地位等级和攻击规范在受欺凌青少年攻击行为中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Dec;51(12):2328-2339. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01677-3. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
6
Victimized adolescents' aggression in cliques with different victimization norms: The healthy context paradox or the peer contagion hypothesis?受欺凌青少年在具有不同欺凌规范的小团体中的攻击行为:是健康环境悖论还是同伴传染假说?
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Jun;92:66-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
7
Can Lower Levels of Classroom Victimization be harmful? Healthy Context Paradox Among Chinese Adolescents.课堂受凌水平较低是否有害?中国青少年的健康情境悖论。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Feb;38(3-4):2464-2484. doi: 10.1177/08862605221102482. Epub 2022 May 19.
8
Experiences of peer victimization and teacher support in secondary school predict university enrolment 5 years later: Role of school engagement.中学生遭受同伴侵害和教师支持的经历可预测 5 年后的大学入学率:学校参与的作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2022 Dec;92(4):1295-1314. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12500. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
9
School Engagement and Context: A Multilevel Analysis of Adolescents in 31 Provincial-Level Regions in China.学校参与度与环境:对中国31个省级行政区青少年的多层次分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 26;12:724819. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724819. eCollection 2021.
10
Why Does Classroom-Level Victimization Moderate the Association Between Victimization and Depressive Symptoms? The "Healthy Context Paradox" and Two Explanations.班级层面受凌辱为何能调节受凌辱与抑郁症状之间的关联?“健康环境悖论”与两种解释。
Child Dev. 2021 Sep;92(5):1836-1854. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13624. Epub 2021 Jul 1.