Liu Yurong, Chen Ruiyu, Zhixuan Wang, Zhang Rui, Jing Hongling, Yu Daheng, Pan Renming
State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Jianghan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
School of Safety Science and Engineering (School of Emergency Management), Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):3668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87718-w.
Powder-based fire extinguishing agents have become a kind of promising substitutes for halon extinguishing agents in civil aircrafts. However, their storage lifespan, significantly influenced by the thermal aging, emerges as a crucial yet overlooked aspect for aviation use. This study investigates the effects of thermal aging cycles on various parameters of ordinary dry powder extinguishing agent (ODPEA) and novel superhydrophobic and oleophobic ultra-fine dry powder extinguishing agent (SHOU DPEA), including surface microscopic morphology, D90 (the diameter at which 90% of the cumulative volume of particles are equal to or smaller than this value), chemical structure, hydrophobic and oleophobic angles, flowability, extinguishing time and effectiveness. The results indicate that SHOU DPEA exhibits smaller particle size, more regular particle shape, significantly superior heat stability and flowability compared to ODPEA. Furthermore, the D90 value evolution of ODPEA with aging time exhibits two stages: (a) a slow and linear growth stage (0-160 days), and (b) a rapid and substantial growth stage (160-200 days). However, SHOU DPEA shows a gradual increase in D90 value throughout the entire accelerated aging process. After 160 days of aging or more, the performance of ODPEA has significantly deteriorated, while SHOU DPEA has shown less degradation. Specially, the extinguishing concentration for the 160-day-aged ODPEA exceeds that of non-aged ODPEA by 10%, whereas the concentration of the 200-day-aged SHOU DPEA is less than 10% of the non-aged counterpart. Additionally, the predicted lifespans for ODPEA and SHOU DPEA at room temperature (25 °C) are 2715 days and over 4525 days, respectively. These findings can provide valuable guidance for assessments and the selection of aviation fire extinguishing agents.
基于粉末的灭火剂已成为民用飞机上哈龙灭火剂的一种有前途的替代品。然而,它们的储存寿命受热老化的显著影响,这已成为航空应用中一个关键但被忽视的方面。本研究调查了热老化循环对普通干粉灭火剂(ODPEA)和新型超疏水疏油超细干粉灭火剂(SHOU DPEA)各种参数的影响,包括表面微观形态、D90(90%的颗粒累积体积等于或小于该值时的直径)、化学结构、疏水疏油角、流动性、灭火时间和效果。结果表明,与ODPEA相比,SHOU DPEA具有更小的粒径、更规则的颗粒形状、显著优越的热稳定性和流动性。此外,ODPEA的D90值随老化时间的演变呈现两个阶段:(a)缓慢线性增长阶段(0 - 160天),以及(b)快速大幅增长阶段(160 - 200天)。然而,SHOU DPEA在整个加速老化过程中D90值逐渐增加。老化160天及以上后,ODPEA的性能显著下降,而SHOU DPEA的降解较少。特别是,老化160天的ODPEA的灭火浓度比未老化的ODPEA高出10%,而老化200天的SHOU DPEA的浓度不到未老化对应物的10%。此外,ODPEA和SHOU DPEA在室温(25°C)下的预测寿命分别为2715天和超过4525天。这些发现可为航空灭火剂的评估和选择提供有价值的指导。