Suppr超能文献

中国的随机研究表明,研究和促进公民诚信需要考虑当地规范。

Randomized studies in China show that studying and promoting civic honesty needs to consider local norms.

作者信息

Hung Iris W, Yiu Yuho, Wu Sihan, Liu Dan, Wang Liman, Han Xiao

机构信息

Department of Marketing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):3710. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87804-z.

Abstract

Civic honesty is a crucial behavior that policymakers and business leaders strive to promote among citizens and employees. We conducted online and field experiments in China adapting the setting of a recent research which employed an innovative design to study civic honesty behavior around the globe. Results show that the psychological mechanism underlying lost-wallet reporting behavior in China is somewhat different from what has been suggested in the literature. Chinese participants indicated they are significantly more likely to put WeChat than email as contact information on their lost items, corroborating a local norm in China that email is infrequently used by ordinary Chinese citizens. Moreover, we tested multiple behavioral interventions in the field. Aiding a lost-property finder to connect to an owner using WeChat led to a reporting rate of 59.3% (vs. 7% as shown in a recent research that used email as the communication means; note that due to differences in experimental designs, no direct comparison of these reporting rates should be made however). Our research suggests that interacting with citizens from a targeted population to formulate locally informed research questions and design may be crucial for understanding and promoting civic honesty behavior.

摘要

公民诚信是政策制定者和企业领导者努力在公民和员工中推广的关键行为。我们在中国进行了线上和实地实验,采用了近期一项研究的背景设置,该研究采用创新设计来研究全球范围内的公民诚信行为。结果表明,中国失物招领报告行为背后的心理机制与文献中所提出的有所不同。中国参与者表示,他们在失物上显著更倾向于留下微信而非电子邮件作为联系方式,这证实了中国的一个本土规范,即普通中国公民很少使用电子邮件。此外,我们在实地测试了多种行为干预措施。帮助失物拾获者通过微信与失主取得联系,报告率达到了59.3%(相比之下,近期一项使用电子邮件作为沟通方式的研究显示报告率为7%;请注意,由于实验设计的差异,然而不应直接比较这些报告率)。我们的研究表明,与目标人群的公民互动以制定基于当地情况的研究问题和设计,对于理解和促进公民诚信行为可能至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21a7/11779863/22f2d812932e/41598_2025_87804_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Unraveling controversies over civic honesty measurement: An extended field replication in China.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 18;120(29):e2213824120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213824120. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
4
Civic honesty around the globe.
Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):70-73. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8712. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
5
Alternative Systems: The Interplay Between Criminal Groups' Influence and Political Trust on Civic Honesty in the Global Context.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2024 May;15(4):439-449. doi: 10.1177/19485506231176615. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
6
Social norms and dishonesty across societies.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 2;119(31):e2120138119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120138119. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
7
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
The effects of self- and other-awareness on Chinese children's truth-telling.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;37(3):323-335. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12275. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
9
Honesty-humility under threat: Self-uncertainty destroys trust among the nice guys.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;114(1):179-194. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000144. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
10
Are virtuous people happy all around the world? Civic virtue, antisocial punishment, and subjective well-being across cultures.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;39(7):927-42. doi: 10.1177/0146167213485902. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Unraveling controversies over civic honesty measurement: An extended field replication in China.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 18;120(29):e2213824120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213824120. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Toward a taxonomy and review of honesty interventions.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Oct;47:101410. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101410. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
3
Collaborative dishonesty: A meta-analytic review.
Psychol Bull. 2021 Dec;147(12):1241-1268. doi: 10.1037/bul0000349.
4
Effects of Trust and Threat Messaging on Academic Cheating: A Field Study.
Psychol Sci. 2021 May;32(5):735-742. doi: 10.1177/0956797620977513. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
5
Details matter: predicting when nudging clinicians will succeed or fail.
BMJ. 2020 Sep 15;370:m3256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3256.
6
Can Priming Legal Consequences and the Concept of Honesty Decrease Cheating During Examinations?
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 21;10:2887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02887. eCollection 2019.
7
Civic honesty around the globe.
Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):70-73. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8712. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior.
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jan;145(1):1-44. doi: 10.1037/bul0000174.
9
Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to culture.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11406-11413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803526115.
10
Toward a psychology of : Making psychological science more representative of the human population.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11401-11405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721165115.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验