• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会规范与跨社会的不诚实行为。

Social norms and dishonesty across societies.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá DC 111711, Colombia.

Economic Science Institute, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 2;119(31):e2120138119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120138119. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2120138119
PMID:35901207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9351361/
Abstract

Social norms have long been recognized as an important factor in curtailing antisocial behavior, and stricter prosocial norms are commonly associated with increased prosocial behavior. In this study, we provide evidence that very strict prosocial norms can have a perverse negative relationship with prosocial behavior. In laboratory experiments conducted in 10 countries across 5 continents, we measured the level of honest behavior and elicited injunctive norms of honesty. We find that individuals who hold very strict norms (i.e., those who perceive a small lie to be as socially unacceptable as a large lie) are more likely to lie to the maximal extent possible. This finding is consistent with a simple behavioral rationale. If the perceived norm does not differentiate between the severity of a lie, lying to the full extent is optimal for a norm violator since it maximizes the financial gain, while the perceived costs of the norm violation are unchanged. We show that the relation between very strict prosocial norms and high levels of rule violations generalizes to civic norms related to common moral dilemmas, such as tax evasion, cheating on government benefits, and fare dodging on public transportation. Those with very strict attitudes toward civic norms are more likely to lie to the maximal extent possible. A similar relation holds across countries. Countries with a larger fraction of people with very strict attitudes toward civic norms have a higher society-level prevalence of rule violations.

摘要

社会规范长期以来一直被认为是遏制反社会行为的一个重要因素,而更严格的亲社会规范通常与更多的亲社会行为有关。在这项研究中,我们提供的证据表明,非常严格的亲社会规范可能与亲社会行为产生相反的负面影响。在跨越 5 大洲的 10 个国家进行的实验室实验中,我们测量了诚实行为的水平,并引出了诚实的规范。我们发现,那些持有非常严格规范的人(即那些认为小谎和大谎一样不可接受的人)更有可能尽可能地撒谎。这一发现与一个简单的行为推理一致。如果感知到的规范不能区分谎言的严重程度,那么对于规范违反者来说,尽可能地撒谎是最优的,因为它最大限度地提高了经济收益,而规范违反的感知成本则保持不变。我们表明,非常严格的亲社会规范与高水平的规则违反之间的关系适用于与常见道德困境相关的公民规范,如逃税、骗取政府福利和逃避公共交通费用。那些对公民规范持有非常严格态度的人更有可能尽可能地撒谎。这种关系在各国之间是普遍存在的。那些对公民规范持有非常严格态度的人比例较大的国家,其社会层面的规则违反现象更为普遍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c6/9351361/fed0ca76c029/pnas.2120138119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c6/9351361/fed0ca76c029/pnas.2120138119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c6/9351361/fed0ca76c029/pnas.2120138119fig01.jpg

相似文献

1
Social norms and dishonesty across societies.社会规范与跨社会的不诚实行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 2;119(31):e2120138119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120138119. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
Cheating to benefit others? On the relation between Honesty-Humility and prosocial lies.为使他人受益而欺骗?论诚实谦逊与亲社会谎言之间的关系。
J Pers. 2024 Jun;92(3):870-882. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12835. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
3
Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies.内在诚实与社会中违规行为的普遍性。
Nature. 2016 Mar 24;531(7595):496-9. doi: 10.1038/nature17160. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
4
Social sanctions in response to injunctive norm violations.对禁止令违规行为的社会制裁。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Oct;59:101850. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101850. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
5
Intuitive Honesty Versus Dishonesty: Meta-Analytic Evidence.直觉诚实与不诚实:元分析证据。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep;14(5):778-796. doi: 10.1177/1745691619851778. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
6
Differences and similarities in lying frequency, moral evaluations, and beliefs about lying among children with and without conduct problems.患有与不患有品行问题的儿童在说谎频率、道德评价和说谎信念方面的差异和相似之处。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104768. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
7
Rule Following Mitigates Collaborative Cheating and Facilitates the Spreading of Honesty Within Groups.规则遵循可以减轻协作作弊的程度,并促进群体内部诚实的传播。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Mar;47(3):395-409. doi: 10.1177/0146167220927195. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Everyone's a Critic (Sometimes): Young Children Show High Awareness of, But Lower Adherence to, Prosocial Lying Norms.每个人都是批评家(有时):幼儿对亲社会说谎规范有较高的认知,但遵守程度较低。
J Genet Psychol. 2023 Mar-Apr;184(2):93-101. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2022.2158439. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
9
On being honest about dishonesty: The social costs of taking nuanced (but realistic) moral stances.关于坦诚面对不诚实行为:采取微妙(但现实)的道德立场所带来的社会成本。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Aug;125(2):259-283. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000340. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Social control, social learning, and cheating: Evidence from lab and online experiments on dishonesty.社会控制、社会学习与欺骗行为:来自实验室及线上不诚实行为实验的证据
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Sep;53:311-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models.大语言模型的文化偏见与文化契合度
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 17;3(9):pgae346. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae346. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Commitment to honesty oaths decreases dishonesty, but commitment to another individual does not affect dishonesty.对诚实誓言的承诺会减少不诚实行为,但对他人的承诺不会影响不诚实行为。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Oct 24;1(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00028-7.
3
Language matters: how normative expressions shape norm perception and affect norm compliance.

本文引用的文献

1
Nudging enforcers: how norm perceptions and motives for lying shape sanctions.推动执行者:规范认知与说谎动机如何影响制裁措施
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Jul 4;2(7):pgad224. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad224. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Collaborative dishonesty: A meta-analytic review.协同作弊:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Dec;147(12):1241-1268. doi: 10.1037/bul0000349.
3
Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance.超越西方、有教养、工业化、富有和民主(WEIRD)心理学:衡量和绘制文化和心理距离的尺度。
语言很重要:规范表达如何塑造规范感知并影响规范遵守。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230037. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0037. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;31(6):678-701. doi: 10.1177/0956797620916782. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
The historical roots of economic development.经济发展的历史根源。
Science. 2020 Mar 27;367(6485). doi: 10.1126/science.aaz9986.
5
The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation.教会、密集的亲属关系与全球心理差异。
Science. 2019 Nov 8;366(6466). doi: 10.1126/science.aau5141.
6
Civic honesty around the globe.全球公民诚信。
Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):70-73. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8712. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
Social norms as solutions.作为解决方案的社会规范。
Science. 2016 Oct 7;354(6308):42-43. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8317.
8
Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies.内在诚实与社会中违规行为的普遍性。
Nature. 2016 Mar 24;531(7595):496-9. doi: 10.1038/nature17160. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
9
The collaborative roots of corruption.腐败的合作根源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):10651-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423035112. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
Culture and National Well-Being: Should Societies Emphasize Freedom or Constraint?文化与国民福祉:社会应强调自由还是约束?
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):e0127173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127173. eCollection 2015.