• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蜜蜂蜇刺行为在时间和社会背景下的一致性与个体性。

Consistency and individuality of honeybee stinging behaviour across time and social contexts.

作者信息

Kannan Kavitha, Galizia C Giovanni, Nouvian Morgane

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Center for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 29;12(1):241295. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241295. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.241295
PMID:39881791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11774586/
Abstract

Whether individuals exhibit consistent behavioural variation is a central question in the field of animal behaviour. This question is particularly interesting in the case of social animals, as their behaviour may be strongly modulated by the collective. In this study, we ask whether honeybees exhibit individual differences in stinging behaviour. We demonstrate that bees are relatively stable in their decision to sting-or not-in a specific context and show temporal consistency suggestive of an internal state modulation. We also investigated how social factors such as the alarm pheromone or another bee modulated this behaviour. The presence of alarm pheromone increased the likelihood of a bee to sting but this response decayed over trials, while the presence of a conspecific decreased individual stinging likelihood. These factors, however, did not alter stinging consistency. We therefore propose that social modulation acts by shifting the stinging threshold of individuals. Finally, experimental manipulation of group composition with respect to the ratio of aggressive and gentle bees within a group did not affect the behaviour of focal bees. Overall, our results establish honeybee stinging behaviour as a promising model for studying mechanistically how collective and individual traits interact to regulate individual variability.

摘要

个体是否表现出一致的行为差异是动物行为领域的核心问题。对于群居动物而言,这个问题尤为有趣,因为它们的行为可能会受到群体的强烈调节。在本研究中,我们探究蜜蜂在蜇刺行为上是否存在个体差异。我们证明,蜜蜂在特定情境下蜇刺或不蜇刺的决定相对稳定,并且表现出时间上的一致性,这表明存在内部状态调节。我们还研究了诸如报警信息素或另一只蜜蜂等社会因素如何调节这种行为。报警信息素的存在增加了蜜蜂蜇刺的可能性,但这种反应在试验过程中会衰减,而同种蜜蜂的存在则降低了个体蜇刺的可能性。然而,这些因素并没有改变蜇刺的一致性。因此,我们认为社会调节是通过改变个体的蜇刺阈值来起作用的。最后,对群体组成进行实验操作,改变群体中攻击性蜜蜂和温顺蜜蜂的比例,并未影响目标蜜蜂的行为。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,蜜蜂蜇刺行为是一个很有前景的模型,可用于从机制上研究集体特征和个体特征如何相互作用以调节个体变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/b38071176416/rsos.241295.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/626ba737a4dc/rsos.241295.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/8ff803002e79/rsos.241295.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/ebabd3215b6c/rsos.241295.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/b38071176416/rsos.241295.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/626ba737a4dc/rsos.241295.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/8ff803002e79/rsos.241295.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/ebabd3215b6c/rsos.241295.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/11774586/b38071176416/rsos.241295.f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Consistency and individuality of honeybee stinging behaviour across time and social contexts.蜜蜂蜇刺行为在时间和社会背景下的一致性与个体性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 29;12(1):241295. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241295. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Extracting individual characteristics from population data reveals a negative social effect during honeybee defence.从群体数据中提取个体特征揭示了在蜜蜂防御过程中的一种负面社会效应。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Sep 15;18(9):e1010305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010305. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Honeybee communication during collective defence is shaped by predation.在集体防御过程中,蜜蜂的交流方式受到捕食的影响。
BMC Biol. 2021 May 25;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01028-x.
4
Seasonality, alarm pheromone and serotonin: insights on the neurobiology of honeybee defence from winter bees.季节性、报警信息素和血清素:冬季蜜蜂在蜜蜂防御神经生物学方面的新见解。
Biol Lett. 2018 Aug;14(8). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0337.
5
Cooperative defence operates by social modulation of biogenic amine levels in the honey bee brain.合作防御通过社会调节蜜蜂大脑中的生物胺水平来运作。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jan 31;285(1871). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2653.
6
An alarm pheromone modulates appetitive olfactory learning in the honeybee (apis mellifera).一种报警信息素调节蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的嗜好性嗅觉学习。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2010 Aug 30;4. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00157. eCollection 2010.
7
Quantitative trait loci that influence the expression of guarding and stinging behaviors of individual honey bees.影响单个蜜蜂守卫和蜇刺行为表达的数量性状基因座。
Behav Genet. 2003 May;33(3):357-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1023458827643.
8
Division of labour during honeybee colony defence: poetic and scientific views.蜜蜂群体防御中的分工:诗意与科学视角
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Mar 20;380(1922):20230272. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0272.
9
Discovery of 3-methyl-2-buten-1-yl acetate, a new alarm component in the sting apparatus of Africanized honeybees.发现3-甲基-2-丁烯-1-醇乙酸酯,一种非洲化蜜蜂螫刺器官中的新型报警成分。
J Chem Ecol. 2003 Feb;29(2):453-63. doi: 10.1023/a:1022694330868.
10
Alarm pheromone induces stress analgesia via an opioid system in the honeybee.报警信息素通过蜜蜂体内的阿片系统诱导应激镇痛。
Physiol Behav. 1997 Dec 31;63(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00391-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-cell dissection of aggression in honeybee colonies.蜜蜂群体中攻击行为的单细胞剖析
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Aug;7(8):1232-1244. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02090-0. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
2
Extracting individual characteristics from population data reveals a negative social effect during honeybee defence.从群体数据中提取个体特征揭示了在蜜蜂防御过程中的一种负面社会效应。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Sep 15;18(9):e1010305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010305. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Honeybee communication during collective defence is shaped by predation.
在集体防御过程中,蜜蜂的交流方式受到捕食的影响。
BMC Biol. 2021 May 25;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01028-x.
4
Genomic regions influencing aggressive behavior in honey bees are defined by colony allele frequencies.影响蜜蜂攻击性行为的基因组区域由群体等位基因频率决定。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):17135-17141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922927117. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
The cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of honey bee workers develop via a socially-modulated innate process.工蜂的表皮碳氢化合物图谱是通过一种社会调节的先天过程发展而来的。
Elife. 2019 Feb 5;8:e41855. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41855.
6
Social interactions promote adaptive resource defense in ants.社会互动促进蚂蚁的适应性资源防御。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0183872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183872. eCollection 2017.
7
Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Behavior and Group Functioning of Schooling Fish.一致的个体差异驱动着有组织鱼类的集体行为和群体功能。
Curr Biol. 2017 Sep 25;27(18):2862-2868.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Sequential social experiences interact to modulate aggression but not brain gene expression in the honey bee ().连续的社会经历相互作用以调节蜜蜂的攻击性,但不影响其大脑基因表达。
Front Zool. 2017 Mar 3;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12983-017-0199-8. eCollection 2017.
9
The defensive response of the honeybee Apis mellifera.蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的防御反应。
J Exp Biol. 2016 Nov 15;219(Pt 22):3505-3517. doi: 10.1242/jeb.143016.
10
Copy-when-uncertain: bumblebees rely on social information when rewards are highly variable.不确定时复制:当奖励高度可变时,大黄蜂会依赖社会信息。
Biol Lett. 2016 Jun;12(6). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0188.