• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Application of Bayesian Decision Theory in Detecting Test Fraud.贝叶斯决策理论在检测考试舞弊中的应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2025 Jan 27:01466216251316559. doi: 10.1177/01466216251316559.
2
Which Statistic Should Be Used to Detect Item Preknowledge When the Set of Compromised Items Is Known?当已知被泄露题目集时,应使用哪种统计量来检测题目预知识?
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Sep;41(6):403-421. doi: 10.1177/0146621617698453. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
3
The use of item scores and response times to detect examinees who may have benefited from item preknowledge.利用项目得分和反应时间来检测可能从项目先验知识中受益的考生。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Nov;73(3):397-419. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12187. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
Detecting Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Mixture Hierarchical Model for Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.通过创新措施检测预先知晓作弊行为:一种用于联合建模项目反应、反应时间和视觉注视次数的混合层次模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Oct;83(5):1059-1080. doi: 10.1177/00131644221136142. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
5
Higher-Order Asymptotics and Its Application to Testing the Equality of the Examinee Ability Over Two Sets of Items.高阶渐近及其在检验两组项目中考生能力相等性上的应用。
Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):484-510. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9627-8. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
Detecting Examinees With Item Preknowledge in Large-Scale Testing Using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).使用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)在大规模测试中检测具有项目先验知识的考生。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):931-961. doi: 10.1177/0013164419839439. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
7
Two New Models for Item Preknowledge.项目预知识的两种新模型。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Sep;46(6):447-461. doi: 10.1177/01466216221108130. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
8
Detection of Item Preknowledge Using Response Times.利用反应时间检测项目预知识
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Jul;44(5):376-392. doi: 10.1177/0146621620909893. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
The Lack of Robustness of a Statistic Based on the Neyman-Pearson Lemma to Violations of Its Underlying Assumptions.基于奈曼-皮尔逊引理的统计量对其基本假设违背情况缺乏稳健性。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jan;46(1):19-39. doi: 10.1177/01466216211049209. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
10
Are Exam Questions Known in Advance? Using Local Dependence to Detect Cheating.考试题目会提前泄露吗?利用局部相依性来检测作弊行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167545. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of fit of item response theory models: A critical review of the status quo and some future directions.项目反应理论模型的拟合度评估:对现状的批判性综述及一些未来方向
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2025 Nov;78(3):711-733. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12378. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
2
Answer Similarity Analysis at the Group Level.组水平的答案相似性分析。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jul;45(5):299-314. doi: 10.1177/01466216211013109. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Detection of Item Preknowledge Using Response Times.利用反应时间检测项目预知识
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Jul;44(5):376-392. doi: 10.1177/0146621620909893. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
4
Higher-Order Asymptotics and Its Application to Testing the Equality of the Examinee Ability Over Two Sets of Items.高阶渐近及其在检验两组项目中考生能力相等性上的应用。
Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):484-510. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9627-8. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
Detecting Item Preknowledge Using a Predictive Checking Method.使用预测性检查方法检测项目预知识。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Jun;41(4):243-263. doi: 10.1177/0146621616687285. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
6
Estimating the Probability of Traditional Copying, Conditional on Answer-Copying Statistics.根据答案抄袭统计数据估算传统抄袭的概率。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jun;40(4):258-273. doi: 10.1177/0146621615622780. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
Detecting Test Tampering Using Item Response Theory.使用项目反应理论检测考试作弊行为。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Dec;75(6):931-953. doi: 10.1177/0013164414568716. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
8
Bayesian Checks on Cheating on Tests.关于考试作弊的贝叶斯检验
Psychometrika. 2015 Sep;80(3):689-706. doi: 10.1007/s11336-014-9409-x. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
9
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的意义及应用。
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.

贝叶斯决策理论在检测考试舞弊中的应用

Application of Bayesian Decision Theory in Detecting Test Fraud.

作者信息

Sinharay Sandip, Johnson Matthew S

机构信息

Educational Testing Service, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2025 Jan 27:01466216251316559. doi: 10.1177/01466216251316559.

DOI:10.1177/01466216251316559
PMID:39881856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773507/
Abstract

This article suggests a new approach based on Bayesian decision theory (e.g., Cronbach & Gleser, 1965; Ferguson, 1967) for detection of test fraud. The approach leads to a simple decision rule that involves the computation of the posterior probability that an examinee committed test fraud given the data. The suggested approach was applied to a real data set that involved actual test fraud.

摘要

本文提出了一种基于贝叶斯决策理论(例如,克龙巴赫和格莱泽,1965年;弗格森,1967年)的新方法来检测考试作弊行为。该方法引出了一个简单的决策规则,该规则涉及计算在给定数据的情况下考生进行考试作弊的后验概率。所建议的方法被应用于一个涉及实际考试作弊行为的真实数据集。