Ivanova Julia, Shah Beju, Foote Carrie, Cummins Mollie R
Doxy.me Research, Doxy.me Inc., Charleston, SC, USA.
Southwest Telehealth Resource Center, Tucson, CA, USA.
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 29;11:20552076251314552. doi: 10.1177/20552076251314552. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Cost reduction is an often-cited reason to use telemedicine. In assessing telemedicine's cost and value, providers often turn to published cost analyses in the scientific literature for guidance. In this commentary on existing telemedicine cost analysis literature, we discuss the generalizability of these analyses and identify the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to help assess the applicability of a given cost analysis using inner- and outer-setting constructs. Outer-setting factors-location, practice type, and specialty-can substantially affect telemedicine cost and value, as can the implementation setting. While the body of evidence shows telemedicine may often reduce costs, there is still a need for robust cost analyses to guide implementation decisions as telemedicine becomes a mainstay of healthcare provision. Along with a call for more cost research, we ultimately argue that providers should consider a more holistic, value-based approach to determining when and how telemedicine implementation could benefit healthcare delivery.
成本降低是使用远程医疗的一个经常被提及的理由。在评估远程医疗的成本和价值时,提供者常常参考科学文献中已发表的成本分析以获取指导。在这篇关于现有远程医疗成本分析文献的评论中,我们讨论了这些分析的可推广性,并确定了实施研究综合框架,以帮助使用内部和外部环境构建来评估特定成本分析的适用性。外部环境因素——地点、执业类型和专业——会极大地影响远程医疗的成本和价值,实施环境也是如此。虽然有证据表明远程医疗通常可以降低成本,但随着远程医疗成为医疗保健服务的支柱,仍需要进行强有力的成本分析来指导实施决策。除了呼吁开展更多成本研究外,我们最终认为提供者应考虑采用更全面、基于价值的方法来确定何时以及如何实施远程医疗能够使医疗服务受益。