• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否需要常规进行分组和保存样本?

Is Routine Group and Save Sampling Necessary for Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy?

作者信息

Harrow Simeon, Nadarajasundaram Aaruran

机构信息

Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, GBR.

General Surgery, Croydon University Hospital, London, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):e78086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78086. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.78086
PMID:39882197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11774625/
Abstract

Background Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a commonly used approach for the surgical management of acute appendicitis. If complications arise, a blood transfusion may be necessary for patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy. The need for routine group and save (G&S) sampling prior to emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy remains a subject of ongoing discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether routine G&S sampling is needed prior to emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy. Methods The present study retrospectively reviewed G&S sampling for emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy cases over a six-month period at two hospital sites in the United Kingdom: Croydon University Hospital (June 1, 2024, to November 30, 2024) and Tunbridge Wells Hospital (October 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024). A total of 304 patients across both sites were included in the review. Results In 2023, 23 procedures (7.6%) were performed, while 279 procedures (92.4%) occurred in 2024. The patient population consisted of 46.4% males () and 53.6% females (), with a mean age of 37.1 years (median 33, range 6-84). A total of 406 G&S samples were collected, of which 351 (86.5%) were processed and 55 (13.5%) were rejected by the blood bank. From the sample size, only one patient received a blood transfusion prior to surgery due to a low hemoglobin level of 72 g/L, likely resulting from the delayed presentation of a perforated appendix. Conclusion This study suggests that omitting routine G&S sampling is safe for patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy. Hence, an individualized risk assessment approach should be used to identify high-risk patients requiring preoperative G&S sampling.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术是急性阑尾炎外科治疗的常用方法。如果出现并发症,急诊阑尾切除术患者可能需要输血。急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术之前是否需要常规进行血型鉴定和交叉配血(G&S)采样仍是一个持续讨论的话题。本研究的目的是评估急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术之前是否需要常规进行G&S采样。方法:本研究回顾性分析了英国两个医院在六个月期间急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术病例的G&S采样情况:克罗伊登大学医院(2024年6月1日至2024年11月30日)和汤布里奇韦尔斯医院(2023年10月1日至2024年4月30日)。两个医院共304例患者纳入分析。结果:2023年进行了23例手术(7.6%),2024年进行了279例手术(92.4%)。患者群体中男性占46.4%,女性占53.6%,平均年龄37.1岁(中位数33岁,范围6 - 84岁)。共采集了406份G&S样本,其中351份(86.5%)被血库处理,55份(13.5%)被血库拒收。从样本量来看,只有一名患者因血红蛋白水平低至72 g/L在手术前接受了输血,这可能是由于阑尾穿孔就诊延迟所致。结论:本研究表明,对于接受急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者,省略常规G&S采样是安全的。因此,应采用个体化风险评估方法来识别需要术前进行G&S采样的高危患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c8/11774625/2f01ec0a687a/cureus-0017-00000078086-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c8/11774625/56a8d48f82d6/cureus-0017-00000078086-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c8/11774625/2f01ec0a687a/cureus-0017-00000078086-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c8/11774625/56a8d48f82d6/cureus-0017-00000078086-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c8/11774625/2f01ec0a687a/cureus-0017-00000078086-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Routine Group and Save Sampling Necessary for Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy?急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否需要常规进行分组和保存样本?
Cureus. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):e78086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78086. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
A Retrospective Study of Routine Preoperative Blood Grouping and Saving in Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Minimally Utilized Expenditure.腹腔镜手术中常规术前血型鉴定与储血的回顾性研究:一项利用极少的支出
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68557. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68557. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study.
Scott Med J. 2025 Feb;70(1):10-14. doi: 10.1177/00369330241307338. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
4
The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术前行群体筛查及血型鉴定的作用
Cureus. 2024 Dec 1;16(12):e74898. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74898. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Routine blood group and antibody screening prior to emergency laparoscopy.急诊腹腔镜检查前的常规血型及抗体筛查。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Apr;100(4):322-325. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0033. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
6
The Rate of Negative Appendicectomy and Perforated Appendicitis As Quality Indicators of the General Surgical Service in a District General Hospital in Cavan, Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国卡万一家区综合医院普通外科服务质量指标:阴性阑尾切除术和穿孔性阑尾炎的发生率
Cureus. 2023 Jun 3;15(6):e39895. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39895. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
The Necessity of Routine Pre-operative Group and Save Testing for Emergency Appendectomies.急诊阑尾切除术前常规进行血型鉴定和交叉配血试验的必要性。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 6;15(12):e50032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50032. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess.阑尾蜂窝织炎或脓肿的早期与延迟阑尾切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD011670. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011670.pub3.
9
Routine group and save screening prior to emergency laparoscopic surgery.常规术前分组和保存筛选,用于急诊腹腔镜手术。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Jun;103(6):412-414. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7135. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
10
Transition towards laparoscopic appendicectomy at a UK center over a 7-year period.英国一家中心在7年时间里向腹腔镜阑尾切除术的转变。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb;25(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000017.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术前行群体筛查及血型鉴定的作用
Cureus. 2024 Dec 1;16(12):e74898. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74898. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study.
Scott Med J. 2025 Feb;70(1):10-14. doi: 10.1177/00369330241307338. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
A Retrospective Study of Routine Preoperative Blood Grouping and Saving in Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Minimally Utilized Expenditure.腹腔镜手术中常规术前血型鉴定与储血的回顾性研究:一项利用极少的支出
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68557. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68557. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review.胆囊切除术和阑尾切除术术前血型检查的要求:系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2205-2216. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02600-x. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
5
Personalized Surgical Transfusion Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning to Guide Preoperative Type and Screen Orders.利用机器学习进行个性化手术输血风险预测,以指导术前血型和筛查订单。
Anesthesiology. 2022 Jul 1;137(1):55-66. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004139.
6
Moving from an era of open appendectomy to an era of laparoscopic appendectomy: A nationwide cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery for appendicitis.从开腹阑尾切除术时代迈向腹腔镜阑尾切除术时代:一项针对接受阑尾炎手术的成年患者的全国性队列研究。
Scand J Surg. 2021 Dec;110(4):512-519. doi: 10.1177/1457496921992615. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
7
Routine blood group and antibody screening prior to emergency laparoscopy.急诊腹腔镜检查前的常规血型及抗体筛查。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Apr;100(4):322-325. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0033. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人及儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Jun;5(4):542-553. doi: 10.1177/2050640616661931. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项评估结局和成本效益的回顾性队列研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5. eCollection 2016.
10
Are Routine Blood Group and Save Samples Needed for Laparoscopic Day Case Surgery?腹腔镜日间手术是否需要常规血型鉴定及备血样本?
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1295-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3463-8.