Ford Katherine L, Basualdo-Hammond Carlota, Nasser Roseann, Avdagovska Melita, Keller Heather, Malone Ainsley, Bauer Judy D, Correia M Isabel T D, Cardenas Diana, Gramlich Leah
Department of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Clinical Nutrition Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024 Dec 8;7(2):e000975. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-000975. eCollection 2024.
Health policies promote optimal care, yet policies that address disease-related malnutrition (DRM) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review to identify literature on existing and planned policy to address DRM in children or adults and explore the settings, contexts and actors of DRM policy.
A search strategy comprising DRM and policy keywords was applied to eight databases on 24 February 2023. Articles that addressed DRM and policy were selected for inclusion after two independent reviews. The health policy triangle (HPT) framework (ie, actors, content, contexts and processes considerations for policy) guided data extraction and thematic analysis.
A total of 67 articles were included out of the 37 196 identified. Some articles (n=14) explored established policies at the local level related to food and mealtime, nutrition care practices, oral nutritional supplement prescribing or reimbursement. Other articles gave direction or rationale for DRM policy. As part of the HPT, actors included researchers, advocacy groups and DRM champions while content pertained to standard processes for nutrition care such as screening, assessment, intervention and monitoring. Contexts included acute care and care home settings with a focus on paediatrics, adults, older adults. Processes identified were varied and influenced by the type of policy (eg, local, national, international) and its goal (eg, advocating, developing, implementing).
There is a paucity of global DRM policy. Nutrition screening, assessment, intervention and monitoring are consistently identified as important to DRM policy. Decision makers are important actors and should consider context, content and processes to develop and mobilise DRM policy to improve nutrition care. Future efforts need to prioritise the development and implementation of policies addressing DRM.
卫生政策旨在促进最佳医疗服务,但针对疾病相关营养不良(DRM)的政策却付诸阙如。本研究旨在进行一项范围综述,以识别有关解决儿童或成人DRM的现有政策和计划政策的文献,并探讨DRM政策的背景、环境和参与者。
2023年2月24日,将包含DRM和政策关键词的检索策略应用于八个数据库。经过两轮独立评审后,选取涉及DRM和政策的文章纳入研究。卫生政策三角(HPT)框架(即政策的参与者、内容、背景和过程考量)指导数据提取和主题分析。
在识别出的37196篇文章中,共纳入67篇。部分文章(n = 14)探讨了地方层面与食物和用餐时间、营养护理实践、口服营养补充剂处方或报销相关的既定政策。其他文章为DRM政策提供了方向或理论依据。作为HPT的一部分,参与者包括研究人员、倡导团体和DRM倡导者,而内容涉及营养护理的标准流程,如筛查、评估、干预和监测。背景包括以儿科、成人、老年人为重点的急性护理和养老院环境。确定的过程各不相同,并受政策类型(如地方、国家、国际)及其目标(如倡导、制定、实施)的影响。
全球DRM政策匮乏。营养筛查、评估、干预和监测一直被认为对DRM政策很重要。决策者是重要的参与者,应考虑背景、内容和过程,以制定和推动DRM政策,改善营养护理。未来的工作需要优先发展和实施解决DRM的政策。