Tian Chun, Wang Aihua, Kuang Yonghong
Department of Anesthesiology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402160, P.R. China.
Department of Science and Education, Yongchuan District People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400010, P.R. China.
Biomed Rep. 2025 Jan 21;22(3):49. doi: 10.3892/br.2025.1927. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), including pre-conditioning (RIPC, before the ischemic event), per-conditioning (RIPerC, during the ischemic event), and post-conditioning (RIPostC, after the ischemic event), protects the liver in animal hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuries models. However, several questions regarding the optimal timing of intervention and administration protocols remain unanswered. Therefore, the preclinical evidence on RIC in the HIRI models was systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed in the present review to provide constructive and helpful information for future works. In the present review, 39 articles were identified by searching the PubMed, OVID, Web of Science and Embase databases spanned from database inception to July 2024. According to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, data were extracted independently by two researchers. The primary outcomes evaluated in this study were those directly related to liver injury, such as alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) and liver histopathology. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias tool of the SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE). The findings were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and analyzed using random-effects models. Egger's test was used to evaluate the publication bias. RIC significantly reduced the changes in ALT, AST and liver histopathology (all P<0.00001). These effects had two peaks, with the first peak of RIPerC/RIPostC occurring earlier, regardless of models and species. RIPerC/RIPostC exerted significant effects on changes in ALT and AST [ALT SMD (95% confidence interval (CI]): RIPC -1.97 (-2.40, -1.55) vs. -2.78 (-3.77, -1.78); P=0.142; AST SMD (95%CI): RIPC -1.45 (-1.90, -0.99) vs. -2.13 (-2.91, -1.34); P=0.142], and RIPC had a greater effect on liver histopathology change [SMD (95%CI): RIPC -2.68 (-3.67, -1.69) vs. -1.58 (-2.24, -0.92); P=0.070]; however, no interactions were observed between the two groups in the meta-regression analysis. RIC is the most effective in experimental HIRI, using a 10-25-min dose. These outcomes suggest that RIC may be a promising strategy for treating HIRI; however, future studies using repeated doses in animal models with comorbidities will present novel ideas for its therapeutic application. The protocol of present study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023482725).
远程缺血预处理(RIC),包括预处理(RIPC,在缺血事件之前)、术中预处理(RIPerC,在缺血事件期间)和术后预处理(RIPostC,在缺血事件之后),可在动物肝缺血再灌注损伤模型中保护肝脏。然而,关于干预的最佳时机和给药方案的几个问题仍未得到解答。因此,本综述对肝缺血再灌注损伤(HIRI)模型中RIC的临床前证据进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,为未来的研究提供建设性和有用的信息。在本综述中,通过检索PubMed、OVID、Web of Science和Embase数据库(从数据库创建到2024年7月),共识别出39篇文章。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,由两名研究人员独立提取数据。本研究评估的主要结局是那些与肝损伤直接相关的指标,如丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和肝脏组织病理学。使用实验动物系统评价中心(SYRCLE)的偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。研究结果以标准化均数差(SMD)表示,并使用随机效应模型进行分析。采用Egger检验评估发表偏倚。RIC显著降低了ALT、AST和肝脏组织病理学的变化(所有P<0.00001)。这些效应有两个峰值,RIPerC/RIPostC的第一个峰值出现得更早,与模型和物种无关。RIPerC/RIPostC对ALT和AST的变化有显著影响[ALT SMD(95%置信区间(CI)):RIPC为-1.97(-2.40,-1.55),而RIPerC/RIPostC为-2.78(-(3.77,-1.78);P=0.142;AST SMD(95%CI):RIPC为-1.45(-1.90,-0.99),而RIPerC/RIPostC为-2.13(-2.91,-1.34);P=0.142],RIPC对肝脏组织病理学变化的影响更大[SMD(95%CI):RIPC为-2.68(-3.67,-1.69),而RIPerC/RIPostC为-1.58(-2.24,-0.92);P=0.070];然而,在荟萃回归分析中未观察到两组之间的相互作用。在实验性HIRI中,使用10 - 25分钟的剂量,RIC最为有效。这些结果表明,RIC可能是治疗HIRI的一种有前景的策略;然而,未来在合并症动物模型中使用重复剂量的研究将为其治疗应用提供新的思路。本研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(CRD42023482725)。