Veerman Linda K M, Orm Stian, Fjermestad Krister W, Vatne Torun M, Haukeland Yngvild B, Sterkenburg Paula S, Willemen Agnes M
Clinical Child & Family Studies, Amsterdam Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.
Int J Dev Disabil. 2024 Oct 9;71(1):4-17. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2024.2411511. eCollection 2025.
The Negative Adjustment Scale (NAS) is used to measure adjustment to having a sibling with a disability. However, several adaptations to the scale have been made, and implementation varies across studies and countries. This study examined the psychometric properties across different versions and provides directions for future use and development of the NAS.
The sample comprised 400 siblings aged 6-16 years old from Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium. Measurement invariance was assessed across age groups (8-11 vs. 12-16 years) and translations (Norwegian vs. Dutch), using a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. The psychometric properties of the parent version were assessed among 102 parents from the Dutch sample.
The internal consistency of the NAS was acceptable to good in all versions. A single factor model held across age groups and translations, although higher order invariance was not supported. The child and parent report versions of the NAS did not significantly correlate.
The NAS generally has sufficient psychometric properties. However, these vary across age groups, translations, and informants, causing the NAS to be less appropriate for comparisons between groups. Further adaptation of the NAS or developing a new scale for siblings of children with disabilities, is advised.
消极适应量表(NAS)用于测量对有残疾兄弟姐妹的适应情况。然而,该量表已进行了多项调整,且不同研究和国家的实施方式有所不同。本研究检验了不同版本的心理测量特性,并为NAS的未来使用和发展提供指导。
样本包括来自挪威、荷兰和比利时的400名6 - 16岁的兄弟姐妹。使用多组验证性因素分析评估年龄组(8 - 11岁与12 - 16岁)和翻译版本(挪威语与荷兰语)之间的测量不变性。在荷兰样本的102名父母中评估家长版的心理测量特性。
NAS在所有版本中的内部一致性均可接受或良好。尽管不支持高阶不变性,但单因素模型在年龄组和翻译版本中均成立。NAS的儿童报告版和家长报告版之间无显著相关性。
NAS总体上具有足够的心理测量特性。然而,这些特性在年龄组、翻译版本和信息提供者之间存在差异,导致NAS不太适合进行组间比较。建议对NAS进行进一步调整或为残疾儿童的兄弟姐妹开发新的量表。