Suppr超能文献

重新评估大于胎龄儿:对足月儿和早产儿围产期结局的不同影响。

Re-evaluating large for gestational age: differential effects on perinatal outcomes in term and premature births.

作者信息

Kuo Chun-Heng, Wu Yi-Ling, Chen Chi-Nien, Lo Yu-Ru, Yen I-Weng, Fan Kang-Chih, Tai Yi-Yun, Lin Ming-Wei, Hsu Chih-Cheng, Li Hung-Yuan

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 15;11:1498712. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1498712. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancies with large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses are associated with increased risks of various adverse perinatal outcomes. While existing research primarily focuses on term neonates, less is known about preterm neonates. This study aims to explore the risks of adverse maternal and neonatal perinatal outcomes associated with LGA in term neonates and neonates with different degrees of prematurity, compared to appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonates.

METHODS

Using the Birth Reporting Databases (2007-2018) linked to Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study of singleton neonates delivered between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. Based on gestational age at delivery, the enrolled neonates were classified into term (37-42 weeks of gestation), late preterm (34-36 weeks of gestation), moderate preterm (32-33 weeks of gestation), very preterm (28-31 weeks of gestation), and extremely preterm (24-27 weeks of gestation). LGA was defined by the 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) growth standard and the Taiwan growth standard. Perinatal outcomes were compared between LGA and AGA neonates across different gestational age groups.

RESULTS

Among the 1,602,638 neonates, 44,359 were classified as LGA by the 2013 WHO growth standard. Compared to AGA neonates, LGA neonates in term and late preterm groups exhibited higher risks of primary cesarean section, prolonged labor, neonatal hypoglycemia, birth trauma, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, jaundice needing phototherapy, respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, newborn sepsis, and fetal death. However, most of these risks were not increased in moderate, very, and extremely preterm groups. Conversely, being LGA was associated with lower risks of primary cesarean section (very preterm group), jaundice needing phototherapy (moderate and very preterm groups), respiratory distress (moderate and very preterm groups), NICU admission (moderate and very preterm groups), newborn sepsis (very preterm group), retinopathy of prematurity (late, moderate, and very preterm groups), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (very preterm group). These findings remained consistent when the Taiwan growth standard was applied.

CONCLUSION

Being LGA is associated with increased risks of perinatal complications in term and late preterm neonates, but not in earlier preterm groups. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring management strategies for LGA neonates to consider different degrees of prematurity.

摘要

目的

孕龄大于胎龄(LGA)胎儿的妊娠与各种不良围产期结局风险增加相关。虽然现有研究主要关注足月儿,但对早产儿的了解较少。本研究旨在探讨与足月儿及不同早产程度的新生儿相比,LGA与足月儿和不同早产程度新生儿不良母婴围产期结局的风险。

方法

利用与台湾国民健康保险研究数据库相关联的出生报告数据库(2007 - 2018年),我们对妊娠24至42周分娩的单胎新生儿进行了一项全国性回顾性队列研究。根据分娩时的孕周,将纳入的新生儿分为足月儿(妊娠37 - 42周)、晚期早产儿(妊娠34 - 36周)、中度早产儿(妊娠32 - 33周)、极早产儿(妊娠28 - 31周)和超早产儿(妊娠24 - 27周)。LGA根据2013年世界卫生组织(WHO)生长标准和台湾生长标准定义。比较不同孕周组LGA和适于胎龄(AGA)新生儿的围产期结局。

结果

在1,602,638例新生儿中,根据2013年WHO生长标准,44,359例被分类为LGA。与AGA新生儿相比,足月儿和晚期早产儿组的LGA新生儿出现首次剖宫产、产程延长、新生儿低血糖、产伤、缺氧缺血性脑病、需要光疗的黄疸、呼吸窘迫、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院、新生儿败血症和胎儿死亡的风险更高。然而,在中度、极早产和超早产组中,这些风险大多没有增加。相反,LGA与首次剖宫产风险降低(极早产组)、需要光疗的黄疸(中度和极早产组)、呼吸窘迫(中度和极早产组)、NICU入院(中度和极早产组)、新生儿败血症(极早产组)、早产儿视网膜病变(晚期、中度和极早产组)以及支气管肺发育不良(极早产组)相关。当应用台湾生长标准时,这些发现仍然一致。

结论

LGA与足月儿和晚期早产儿围产期并发症风险增加相关,但在更早的早产组中并非如此。这些发现强调了针对LGA新生儿制定管理策略时考虑不同早产程度的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9100/11774698/e924c0eedcbe/fmed-11-1498712-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验