• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于克林霉素的暴露策略在实验性成熟葡萄球菌生物被膜中的有效性。

Effectiveness of clindamycin-based exposure strategies in experimental mature staphylococcal biofilms.

作者信息

van Dun S C J, Verheul M, Pijls B G C W, Scheper H, van der Does A M, Nibbering P H, de Boer M G J

机构信息

Center for Infectious Diseases, Lab of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Mar 4;13(3):e0194724. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01947-24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01947-24
PMID:39882934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11878082/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Due to increasing antimicrobial resistance and side effects caused by current standard antimicrobial regimens used for treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), alternative options are urgently needed. We aimed to investigate the effect of clindamycin in different exposure strategies against in an mature biofilm model. In short, 7-day biofilms were generated on polystyrene plates and titanium-aluminum-vanadium discs using a clinical PJI isolate. Next, biofilms were exposed to clindamycin according to four strategies: single 24-h exposure; prolonged 48- or 72-h exposure; repeated 24-h exposures during a 4-day period, and sequential exposures of initial 24-h rifampicin-based therapy followed by 24-h exposure to clindamycin. The remaining bacterial load (colony-forming unit [CFU]/mL) after antibiotic exposure was assessed. Confocal laser scanning and atomic force microscopy were applied to evaluate the biofilm structure. Single exposure to clindamycin for 24 h or prolonged up to 72 h did not result in any relevant reduction in bacterial load. Repeated 24-h exposures demonstrated relevant reductions of >3 log CFU/mL at clindamycin concentrations ≥16 mg/L for the 3rd and 4th consecutive doses. Sequential rifampicin-ciprofloxacin combination exposure followed by clindamycin showed bacterial load reductions of 3- to 4-log CFU/mL, similar to continued rifampicin-ciprofloxacin exposure. This was achieved for concentrations equivalent to levels achieved after standard dosing of clindamycin in clinical practice. These experimental findings support that clindamycin monotherapy is not an optimal choice when starting antimicrobial treatment of PJI but that later on, rifampicin may be safely switched to clindamycin in patients with PJI who do not tolerate prolonged rifampicin-based treatment.

IMPORTANCE

Rifampicin-in combination with another antibiotics-is recommended in all guidelines as first choice treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), despite adverse interactions and side effects associated with this antibiotic. In a search for alternative approaches, the switch to clindamycin in patients after rifampicin-based antibiotic treatment was found to be effective in some recent observational clinical studies. In our in vitro study, we determined the effect of clindamycin on in mature biofilms, to obtain further insight. Our study showed that clindamycin was effective in reducing mature biofilm-residing after initial exposure to rifampicin-ciprofloxacin, while it was not effective as first treatment. These in vitro findings provide evidence for the hypothesis that rifampicin-ciprofloxacin can be successfully switched to clindamycin monotherapy in PJI patients in a later phase of treatment.

摘要

未标注

由于用于治疗人工关节感染(PJI)的当前标准抗菌方案导致的抗菌耐药性增加和副作用,迫切需要替代方案。我们旨在研究克林霉素在不同暴露策略下对成熟生物膜模型中[细菌名称未给出]的影响。简而言之,使用临床PJI分离株在聚苯乙烯板和钛铝钒盘上形成7天的生物膜。接下来,根据四种策略将生物膜暴露于克林霉素:单次24小时暴露;延长48或72小时暴露;在4天内重复24小时暴露,以及初始基于利福平的24小时治疗后依次暴露于24小时克林霉素。评估抗生素暴露后剩余的细菌载量(菌落形成单位[CFU]/mL)。应用共聚焦激光扫描和原子力显微镜评估生物膜结构。单次暴露于克林霉素24小时或延长至72小时均未导致细菌载量有任何相关降低。连续24小时重复暴露显示,在克林霉素浓度≥16mg/L时,第3剂和第4剂连续给药后细菌载量有>3 log CFU/mL的相关降低。利福平 - 环丙沙星联合暴露后再用克林霉素显示细菌载量降低3至4 log CFU/mL,类似于持续的利福平 - 环丙沙星暴露。这是在相当于临床实践中克林霉素标准给药后达到的浓度下实现的。这些实验结果支持,在开始PJI抗菌治疗时,克林霉素单药治疗不是最佳选择,但后来,对于不能耐受基于利福平的长期治疗的PJI患者,利福平可以安全地换用克林霉素。

重要性

尽管利福平与另一种抗生素联合使用存在不良相互作用和副作用,但所有指南均推荐其作为人工关节感染(PJI)的首选治疗方法。在寻找替代方法时,最近的一些观察性临床研究发现,在基于利福平的抗生素治疗后,患者换用克林霉素是有效的。在我们的体外研究中,我们确定了克林霉素对成熟生物膜中[细菌名称未给出]的影响,以获得进一步的见解。我们的研究表明,在初始暴露于利福平 - 环丙沙星后,克林霉素在减少成熟生物膜中的[细菌名称未给出]方面是有效的,而作为首次治疗则无效。这些体外研究结果为以下假设提供了证据:在PJI患者治疗的后期阶段,利福平 - 环丙沙星可以成功换用克林霉素单药治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/f9e6c415702b/spectrum.01947-24.f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/3982d75f1c0f/spectrum.01947-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/0dee68d932db/spectrum.01947-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/bee1d19960bd/spectrum.01947-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/09a96f594ee8/spectrum.01947-24.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/3e206beccc93/spectrum.01947-24.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/f9e6c415702b/spectrum.01947-24.f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/3982d75f1c0f/spectrum.01947-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/0dee68d932db/spectrum.01947-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/bee1d19960bd/spectrum.01947-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/09a96f594ee8/spectrum.01947-24.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/3e206beccc93/spectrum.01947-24.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35b6/11878082/f9e6c415702b/spectrum.01947-24.f006.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of clindamycin-based exposure strategies in experimental mature staphylococcal biofilms.基于克林霉素的暴露策略在实验性成熟葡萄球菌生物被膜中的有效性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Mar 4;13(3):e0194724. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01947-24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Tolerant Small-colony Variants Form Prior to Resistance Within a Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Based on Antibiotic Selective Pressure.耐小菌落变异体在基于抗生素选择压力的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜内形成耐药之前形成。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1471-1481. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001740.
3
Antibiotic susceptibility among Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from prosthetic joint infections, with focus on doxycycline.从人工关节感染中分离出的表皮葡萄球菌的抗生素敏感性,重点关注多西环素。
APMIS. 2015 Dec;123(12):1055-60. doi: 10.1111/apm.12465.
4
Genomics of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis from Periprosthetic Joint Infections and Correlation to Clinical Outcome.假体周围关节感染的金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌的基因组学及其与临床结果的相关性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0218121. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02181-21. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
In vitro susceptibility to antibiotics of staphylococci in biofilms isolated from orthopaedic infections.骨科感染分离的生物膜中金葡菌的体外抗生素药敏。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 Jun;41(6):521-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
6
Halicin Is Effective Against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms In Vitro.哈立辛对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜具有体外抑制作用。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Aug 1;480(8):1476-1487. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002251. Epub 2022 May 17.
7
Evaluation of linezolid or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in combination with rifampicin as alternative oral treatments based on an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of staphylococcal biofilm.基于金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜体外药效动力学模型评估利奈唑胺或复方磺胺甲噁唑联合利福平作为替代口服治疗的效果。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Jun;51(6):854-861. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid as an Antimicrobial Agent in Orthopedics-An In Vitro Study About the Race for Surface.二十碳五烯酸和二十二碳六烯酸作为骨科抗菌剂的体外表面竞争研究
Pathogens. 2025 Jan 10;14(1):57. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14010057.
9
Strain-to-strain variability among Staphylococcus aureus causing prosthetic joint infection drives heterogeneity in response to levofloxacin and rifampicin.金黄色葡萄球菌引起的人工关节感染在菌株间存在变异性,导致对左氧氟沙星和利福平的反应存在异质性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Nov 28;77(12):3265-3269. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac311.
10
Antibiotics Enhance Prevention and Eradication Efficacy of Cathodic-Voltage-Controlled Electrical Stimulation against Titanium-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.抗生素增强阴极电压控制电刺激对钛相关耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌生物膜的预防和清除效果。
mSphere. 2019 May 1;4(3):e00178-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00178-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of Rifampicin Resistance in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Centre Cohort Study on 238 Patients.人工关节周围感染中利福平耐药的发生率:一项针对238例患者的单中心队列研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;12(10):1499. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101499.
2
Influence of surface characteristics of implant materials on MRSA biofilm formation and effects of antimicrobial treatment.植入材料表面特性对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜形成的影响及抗菌治疗效果
Front Microbiol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1145210. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1145210. eCollection 2023.
3
Effectiveness of Different Antimicrobial Strategies for Staphylococcal Prosthetic Joint Infection: Results From a Large Prospective Registry-Based Cohort Study.
不同抗菌策略治疗葡萄球菌人工关节感染的有效性:一项基于大型前瞻性注册队列研究的结果
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 13;9(10):ofac474. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac474. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of prosthetic joint infections according to time of occurrence, a 10-year study.根据发病时间的不同,10 年来人工关节感染的流行病学和抗生素耐药性研究。
J Infect. 2022 Nov;85(5):492-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.07.009. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
Antibiotic Therapy for Prosthetic Joint Infections: An Overview.人工关节感染的抗生素治疗:概述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 5;11(4):486. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040486.
6
Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Staphylococcal Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections, Focused on Rifampicin Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.清创、抗生素及保留植入物治疗金黄色葡萄球菌性髋膝关节假体周围感染的疗效,重点关注利福平的使用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 1;8(7):ofab298. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab298. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Influence of the clindamycin administration route on the magnitude of clindamycin-rifampicin interaction: a prospective pharmacokinetic study.克林霉素给药途径对克林霉素-利福平相互作用程度的影响:一项前瞻性药代动力学研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27(12):1857.e1-1857.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
8
SAAP-148 Eradicates MRSA Persisters Within Mature Biofilm Models Simulating Prosthetic Joint Infection.SAAP-148在模拟人工关节感染的成熟生物膜模型中清除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌持留菌。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 29;12:625952. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.625952. eCollection 2021.
9
Clindamycin combination treatment for the treatment of bone and joint infections caused by clindamycin-susceptible, erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus spp.克林霉素联合治疗对克林霉素敏感、红霉素耐药葡萄球菌属所致骨和关节感染的治疗作用
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;99(1):115225. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115225. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Evolution of resistance mechanisms and biological characteristics of rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains selected in vitro.体外筛选的利福平耐药金黄色葡萄球菌耐药机制和生物学特性的演变。
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1573-9.