Sun Jiazheng, Liu Yanna, Yao Linlin, Guo Yunhe, Ma Chenxi, Xiang Tongtong, Cheng Zheyu, Deng Yamin, Xie Xianjun, Qu Guangbo, Shi Jianbo, Jiang Guibin, Wang Yanxin
MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Quality and Health, School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 11;59(5):2722-2731. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09020. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
Groundwater can be contaminated by PFAS emissions, yet research on the presence and associated risks of PFAS in groundwater underlying different land-use areas remains limited. Herein, high-resolution mass spectrometry-based suspect and nontarget analyses were performed to determine PFAS occurrence in groundwater samples obtained from a rural area, a planting region, and the vicinities of a pharmaceutical park, an airport, and an industrial park in Datong City, China. A total of 31 PFAS (16 emerging and 15 legacy PFAS) were identified, and the ΣPFAS concentrations ranged from 0.775 (rural area) to 80.7 ng/L (pharmaceutical park). In terms of the average concentration of ΣPFAS, legacy PFAS were predominant in rural groundwater, whereas emerging PFAS were predominant in the other four land-use areas. PFOA, PFDA, PFUnDA, and 6:2 FTS were detected in all groundwater samples. To further prioritize the risk of identified PFAS in groundwater, the detection frequency; concentration; and persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity attributes were adopted, which showed that high-risk compounds varied across different land-use areas. Our results further reveal the ubiquitous contamination of PFAS in groundwater environments, even in areas with limited human activity, and highlight the necessity of suspect and nontarget analysis for assessing PFAS exposure through groundwater.
地下水可能会受到全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)排放的污染,然而,关于不同土地利用区域地下水中PFAS的存在情况及其相关风险的研究仍然有限。在此,我们采用基于高分辨率质谱的可疑物和非目标物分析方法,以确定从中国大同市的一个农村地区、一个种植区以及一个制药园区、一个机场和一个工业园区附近采集的地下水样本中PFAS的存在情况。共鉴定出31种PFAS(16种新型和15种传统PFAS),ΣPFAS浓度范围为0.775(农村地区)至80.7 ng/L(制药园区)。就ΣPFAS的平均浓度而言,传统PFAS在农村地下水中占主导地位,而新型PFAS在其他四个土地利用区域占主导地位。所有地下水样本中均检测到全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟癸酸(PFDA)、全氟十一酸(PFUnDA)和6:2氟调聚物磺酸(6:2 FTS)。为了进一步确定地下水中已鉴定出的PFAS的风险优先级,我们采用了检测频率、浓度以及持久性、生物累积性和毒性属性,结果表明不同土地利用区域的高风险化合物各不相同。我们的研究结果进一步揭示了PFAS在地下水环境中普遍存在的污染情况,即使在人类活动有限的地区也是如此,并强调了通过可疑物和非目标物分析来评估通过地下水接触PFAS的必要性。