Januraga Pande Putu, Lukitosari Endang, Luhukay Lanny, Hasby Rizky, Sutrisna Aang
Center for Public Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Ministry of Health of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jan 30;11:e56820. doi: 10.2196/56820.
Indonesia's vast archipelago and substantial population size present unique challenges in addressing its multifaceted HIV epidemic, with 90% of its 514 districts and cities reporting cases. Identifying key populations (KPs) is essential for effectively targeting interventions and allocating resources to address the changing dynamics of the epidemic.
We examine the 2022 mapping of Indonesia's KPs to develop improved HIV and AIDS interventions.
In 2022, a district-based mapping of KPs was conducted across 201 districts and cities chosen for their HIV program intensity. This multiphase process included participatory workshops for hotspot identification, followed by direct hotspot observation, then followed by a second direct observation in selected hotspots for quality control. Data from 49,346 informants (KPs) were collected and analyzed. The results from individual hotspots were aggregated at the district or city level, and a formula was used to estimate the population size.
The mapping initiative identified 18,339 hotspots across 201 districts and cities, revealing substantial disparities in hotspot distribution. Of the 18,339 hotspots, 16,964 (92.5%) were observed, of which 1822 (10.74%) underwent a second review to enhance data accuracy. The findings mostly aligned with local stakeholders' estimates, but showed a lower median. Interviews indicated a shift in KP dynamics, with a median decline in hotspot attendance since the pandemic, and there was notable variation in mapping results across district categories. In "comprehensive" areas, the average results for men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs, transgender women, and female sex workers (FSWs) were 1008 (median 694, IQR 317-1367), 224 (median 114, IQR 59-202), 196 (median 167, IQR 81-265), and 775 (median 573, IQR 352-1131), respectively. "Medium" areas had lower averages: MSM at 381 (median 199, IQR 91-454), people who inject drugs at 51 (median 54, IQR 15-63), transgender women at 101 (median 55, IQR 29-127), and FSWs at 304 (median 231, IQR 118-425). "Basic" areas showed the lowest averages: MSM at 161 (median 73, IQR 49-285), people who inject drugs at 7 (median 7, IQR 7-7), transgender women at 59 (median 26, IQR 12-60), and FSWs at 161 (median 131, IQR 59-188). Comparisons with ongoing outreach programs revealed substantial differences: the mapped MSM population was >50% lower than program coverage; the estimates for people who inject drugs were twice as high as the program coverage.
The mapping results highlight significant variations in hotspots and KPs across districts and cities and underscore the necessity of adaptive HIV prevention strategies. The findings informed programmatic decisions, such as reallocating resources to underserved districts and recalibrating outreach strategies to better match KP dynamics. Developing strategies beyond identified hotspots, integrating mapping data into planning, and adopting a longitudinal approach to understand KP behavior over time are critical for effective HIV and AIDS prevention and control.
印度尼西亚幅员辽阔,人口众多,在应对多方面的艾滋病毒疫情方面面临独特挑战,其514个地区和城市中有90%报告了病例。确定关键人群对于有效定位干预措施和分配资源以应对疫情动态变化至关重要。
我们研究了2022年印度尼西亚关键人群的分布图,以制定改进的艾滋病毒和艾滋病干预措施。
2022年,在根据艾滋病毒项目强度选定的201个地区和城市开展了基于地区的关键人群分布图绘制工作。这个多阶段过程包括用于确定热点地区的参与式研讨会,随后是对热点地区的直接观察,然后在选定的热点地区进行第二次直接观察以进行质量控制。收集并分析了来自49346名信息提供者(关键人群)的数据。各个热点地区的结果在地区或城市层面进行汇总,并使用一个公式来估计人口规模。
绘图倡议在201个地区和城市中确定了18339个热点地区,揭示了热点地区分布存在巨大差异。在这18339个热点地区中,观察到了16964个(92.5%),其中1822个(10.74%)接受了第二次审查以提高数据准确性。研究结果大多与当地利益相关者的估计一致,但中位数较低。访谈表明关键人群动态发生了变化,自大流行以来热点地区的参与人数中位数有所下降,并且不同地区类别的绘图结果存在显著差异。在“综合”地区,男男性行为者、注射吸毒者、跨性别女性和女性性工作者的平均结果分别为1008人(中位数694人,四分位距317 - 1367人)、224人(中位数114人,四分位距59 - 202人)、196人(中位数167人,四分位距81 - 265人)和775人(中位数573人,四分位距352 - 1131人)。“中等”地区的平均数较低:男男性行为者为381人(中位数199人,四分位距91 - 454人),注射吸毒者为51人(中位数54人,四分位距15 - 63人),跨性别女性为101人(中位数55人,四分位距29 - 127人),女性性工作者为304人(中位数231人,四分位距118 - 425人)。“基础”地区的平均数最低:男男性行为者为161人(中位数73人,四分位距49 - 285人),注射吸毒者为7人(中位数7人,四分位距7 - 7人),跨性别女性为59人(中位数26人,四分位距12 - 60人),女性性工作者为161人(中位数131人,四分位距59 - 188人)。与正在开展的外展项目的比较显示出巨大差异:绘制的男男性行为者人群比项目覆盖范围低50%以上;注射吸毒者的估计人数是项目覆盖范围的两倍。
绘图结果突出了不同地区和城市热点地区及关键人群的显著差异,并强调了适应性艾滋病毒预防策略的必要性。这些发现为项目决策提供了依据比如将资源重新分配到服务不足的地区,重新调整外展策略以更好地匹配关键人群动态。制定超出已确定热点地区的策略,将绘图数据纳入规划,并采用纵向方法来了解关键人群随时间的行为,对于有效的艾滋病毒和艾滋病预防与控制至关重要。