• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死患者发生胃肠道出血的危险因素:多中心回顾性队列研究

Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Kou Yanqi, Ye Shicai, Tian Yuan, Yang Ke, Qin Ling, Huang Zhe, Luo Botao, Ha Yanping, Zhan Liping, Ye Ruyin, Huang Yujie, Zhang Qing, He Kun, Liang Mouji, Zheng Jieming, Huang Haoyuan, Wu Chunyi, Ge Lei, Yang Yuping

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.

Department of Pathology, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 30;27:e67346. doi: 10.2196/67346.

DOI:10.2196/67346
PMID:39883922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11826945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a severe and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), significantly affecting prognosis during hospitalization. Early identification of high-risk patients is essential to reduce complications, improve outcomes, and guide clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting in-hospital GIB in patients with AMI, identify key risk factors, and evaluate the clinical applicability of the model for risk stratification and decision support.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 1910 patients with AMI from the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University (2005-2024). Patients were divided into training (n=1575) and testing (n=335) cohorts based on admission dates. For external validation, 1746 patients with AMI were included in the publicly available MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV) database. Propensity score matching was adjusted for demographics, and the Boruta algorithm identified key predictors. A total of 7 ML algorithms-logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting, and neural networks-were trained using 10-fold cross-validation. The models were evaluated for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, recall, Fscore, and decision curve analysis. Shapley additive explanations analysis ranked variable importance. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis evaluated the impact of GIB on short-term survival. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the relationship between coronary heart disease (CHD) and in-hospital GIB after adjusting for clinical variables.

RESULTS

The RF model outperformed other ML models, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 in the training cohort, 0.77 in the testing cohort, and 0.75 in the validation cohort. Key predictors included red blood cell count, hemoglobin, maximal myoglobin, hematocrit, CHD, and other variables, all of which were strongly associated with GIB risk. Decision curve analysis demonstrated the clinical use of the RF model for early risk stratification. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in 7- and 15-day survival rates between patients with AMI with and without GIB (P=.83 for 7-day survival and P=.87 for 15-day survival). Multivariate logistic regression showed that CHD was an independent risk factor for in-hospital GIB (odds ratio 2.79, 95% CI 2.09-3.74). Stratified analyses by sex, age, occupation, marital status, and other subgroups consistently showed that the association between CHD and GIB remained robust across all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The ML-based RF model provides a robust and clinically applicable tool for predicting in-hospital GIB in patients with AMI. By leveraging routinely available clinical and laboratory data, the model supports early risk stratification and personalized preventive strategies.

摘要

背景

胃肠道出血(GIB)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者严重且可能危及生命的并发症,显著影响住院期间的预后。早期识别高危患者对于减少并发症、改善预后及指导临床决策至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在开发并验证一种基于机器学习(ML)的模型,用于预测AMI患者的院内GIB,识别关键危险因素,并评估该模型在风险分层和决策支持方面的临床适用性。

方法

进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了广东医科大学附属医院2005年至2024年的1910例AMI患者。根据入院日期将患者分为训练队列(n = 1575)和测试队列(n = 335)。为进行外部验证,将1746例AMI患者纳入公开可用的MIMIC-IV(重症监护医学信息数据库IV)数据库。对人口统计学进行倾向得分匹配,并使用Boruta算法识别关键预测因素。使用7种ML算法——逻辑回归、k近邻、支持向量机、决策树、随机森林(RF)、极端梯度提升和神经网络——通过10折交叉验证进行训练。对模型进行受试者操作特征曲线下面积、准确性、敏感性、特异性、召回率、F分数和决策曲线分析评估。Shapley加性解释分析对变量重要性进行排名。Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估GIB对短期生存的影响。多变量逻辑回归在调整临床变量后评估冠心病(CHD)与院内GIB之间的关系。

结果

RF模型优于其他ML模型,在训练队列中的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.77,测试队列中为0.77,验证队列中为0.75。关键预测因素包括红细胞计数、血红蛋白、最大肌红蛋白、血细胞比容、CHD和其他变量,所有这些均与GIB风险密切相关。决策曲线分析证明了RF模型在早期风险分层中的临床应用。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,有和无GIB的AMI患者在7天和1天生存率方面无显著差异(7天生存率P = 0.83,15天生存率P = 0.87)。多变量逻辑回归显示,CHD是院内GIB的独立危险因素(比值比2.79,95%CI 2.09 - 3.74)。按性别、年龄、职业、婚姻状况和其他亚组进行的分层分析一致表明,CHD与GIB之间的关联在所有亚组中均保持稳健。

结论

基于ML的RF模型为预测AMI患者的院内GIB提供了一种强大且临床适用的工具。通过利用常规可用的临床和实验室数据,该模型支持早期风险分层和个性化预防策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/4d07cf169aca/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/1790f6722981/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/eb73ca917d5e/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/d43339c770a3/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/5495fdb9bd87/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/4d07cf169aca/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/1790f6722981/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/eb73ca917d5e/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/d43339c770a3/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/5495fdb9bd87/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3289/11826945/4d07cf169aca/jmir_v27i1e67346_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.急性心肌梗死患者发生胃肠道出血的危险因素:多中心回顾性队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 30;27:e67346. doi: 10.2196/67346.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Application of an interpretable machine learning method to predict the risk of death during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction combined with diabetes mellitus.应用可解释机器学习方法预测急性心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者住院期间的死亡风险。
Acta Cardiol. 2025 Apr 8:1-18. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2025.2481662.
4
Machine Learning for the Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.用于预测冠心病重症患者急性肾损伤的机器学习:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 28;13:e72349. doi: 10.2196/72349.
5
Predicting acute kidney injury risk in acute myocardial infarction patients: An artificial intelligence model using medical information mart for intensive care databases.预测急性心肌梗死患者的急性肾损伤风险:一种使用重症监护数据库医学信息集市的人工智能模型。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 7;9:964894. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.964894. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment.机器学习方法预测抗血栓治疗患者胃肠道出血的效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10703.
7
A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.一个有助于急性胃肠道出血患者管理的决策支持系统。
Artif Intell Med. 2008 Mar;42(3):247-59. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
8
The future of critical care: AI-powered mortality prediction for acute variceal gastrointestinal bleeding and acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding patients.重症监护的未来:人工智能助力预测急性静脉曲张性胃肠道出血和急性非静脉曲张性胃肠道出血患者的死亡率
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1580094. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1580094. eCollection 2025.
9
Application of machine learning to predict postoperative gastrointestinal bleed in bariatric surgery.机器学习在预测减重手术术后胃肠道出血中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7121-7127. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10156-0. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
10
Predicting the risk of postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with Type A aortic dissection based on an interpretable machine learning model.基于可解释机器学习模型预测A型主动脉夹层患者术后胃肠道出血风险
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 19;12:1554579. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1554579. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
The future of critical care: AI-powered mortality prediction for acute variceal gastrointestinal bleeding and acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding patients.重症监护的未来:人工智能助力预测急性静脉曲张性胃肠道出血和急性非静脉曲张性胃肠道出血患者的死亡率
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1580094. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1580094. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical guide to SHAP analysis: Explaining supervised machine learning model predictions in drug development.SHAP 分析实用指南:在药物研发中解释有监督机器学习模型预测。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70056. doi: 10.1111/cts.70056.
2
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.2024 年心脏病与中风统计数据:美国心脏协会发布的美国和全球数据报告。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
Validation of prediction tools for GI bleeding in patients on dual anti-platelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双重抗血小板治疗的患者胃肠道出血预测工具的验证
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jan;99(1):10-20.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
4
Clinical characteristics and risk factors of in-hospital gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者院内胃肠道出血的临床特征及危险因素
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 27;9:933597. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.933597. eCollection 2022.
5
In-hospital gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute myocardial infarction: incidence, outcomes and risk factors analysis from China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.中国急性心肌梗死注册研究:急性心肌梗死患者院内胃肠道出血的发生率、结局和危险因素分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e044117. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044117.
6
Helicobacter pylori screening in clinical routine during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction.在急性心肌梗死后住院期间进行临床常规的幽门螺杆菌筛查。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jan;231:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.072. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Antiplatelet Therapy, and Bleeding: A Clinical Perspective.急性冠状动脉综合征、抗血小板治疗与出血:临床视角
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):2064. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072064.
8
The challenge of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding management in patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving dual-antiplatelet therapy.接受双联抗血小板治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的管理挑战。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):75-77. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.012.
9
Impact of Anemia on the Risk of Bleeding Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients ≥75 Years of Age.≥75 岁经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者贫血对出血风险的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;125(8):1142-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a national analysis over 11 months.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死后非静脉曲张性上消化道出血:11 个月的全国分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):65-74.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.039. Epub 2020 Feb 1.