• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同设计数字简短干预措施以降低慢性非癌性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物相关伤害风险:患者生活经历的定性分析

Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid-Related Harm Among People With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Lived Experiences.

作者信息

Elphinston Rachel A, Pager Sue, Brown Kelly, Sterling Michele, Fatehi Farhad, Gray Paul, Hipper Linda, Cahill Lauren, Connor Jason P

机构信息

RECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.

National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence - Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 30;9:e57208. doi: 10.2196/57208.

DOI:10.2196/57208
PMID:39883931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11826952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioid medications are important for pain management, but many patients progress to unsafe medication use. With few personalized and accessible behavioral treatment options to reduce potential opioid-related harm, new and innovative patient-centered approaches are urgently needed to fill this gap.

OBJECTIVE

This study involved the first phase of co-designing a digital brief intervention to reduce the risk of opioid-related harm by investigating the lived experience of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) in treatment-seeking patients, with a particular focus on opioid therapy experiences.

METHODS

Eligible patients were those aged between 18 and 70 years with CNCP at a clinically significant level of intensity (a score of ≥4 of 10). Purposive sampling was used to engage patients on public hospital waitlists via mail or through the treating medical specialist. Participants (N=18; n=10 women; mean age 49.5 years, SD 11.50) completed semistructured telephone interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, thematically analyzed using grounded theory, and member checked by patients.

RESULTS

Eight overarching themes were found, listed in the order of their prominence from most to least prominent: limited treatment collaboration and partnership; limited biopsychosocial understanding of pain; continued opioid use when benefits do not outweigh harms; a trial-and-error approach to opioid use; cycles of hopefulness and hopelessness; diagnostic uncertainty; significant negative impacts tied to loss; and complexity of pain and opioid use journeys.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study advance progress in co-designing digital brief interventions by actively engaging patient partners in their lived experiences of chronic pain and use of prescription opioid medications. The key recommendations proposed should guide the development of personalized solutions to address the complex care needs of patients with CNCP.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物对疼痛管理很重要,但许多患者会发展为不安全用药。由于几乎没有个性化且易于获得的行为治疗方案来减少潜在的阿片类药物相关危害,因此迫切需要新的、以患者为中心的创新方法来填补这一空白。

目的

本研究涉及共同设计一种数字简短干预措施的第一阶段,通过调查寻求治疗的慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)患者的生活经历,特别是阿片类药物治疗经历,以降低阿片类药物相关危害的风险。

方法

符合条件的患者为年龄在18至70岁之间、患有临床显著强度(10分制中≥4分)的CNCP患者。采用目的抽样法,通过邮件或经主治医学专家联系公立医院候诊名单上的患者。参与者(N = 18;n = 10名女性;平均年龄49.5岁,标准差11.50)完成了半结构化电话访谈。访谈逐字记录,采用扎根理论进行主题分析,并由患者进行成员核对。

结果

发现了八个总体主题,按突出程度从高到低列出:治疗协作和伙伴关系有限;对疼痛的生物心理社会理解有限;当益处不大于危害时仍继续使用阿片类药物;阿片类药物使用的试错方法;希望与绝望的循环;诊断不确定性;与丧失相关的重大负面影响;以及疼痛和阿片类药物使用历程的复杂性。

结论

本研究结果通过让患者伙伴积极参与其慢性疼痛和处方阿片类药物使用的生活经历,推动了数字简短干预措施共同设计方面的进展。提出的关键建议应指导开发个性化解决方案,以满足CNCP患者的复杂护理需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e029/11826952/6e0b76e8573b/formative_v9i1e57208_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e029/11826952/83e04246d0ac/formative_v9i1e57208_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e029/11826952/3d02e55f71bd/formative_v9i1e57208_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e029/11826952/6e0b76e8573b/formative_v9i1e57208_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e029/11826952/83e04246d0ac/formative_v9i1e57208_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e029/11826952/3d02e55f71bd/formative_v9i1e57208_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e029/11826952/6e0b76e8573b/formative_v9i1e57208_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid-Related Harm Among People With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Lived Experiences.共同设计数字简短干预措施以降低慢性非癌性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物相关伤害风险:患者生活经历的定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 30;9:e57208. doi: 10.2196/57208.
2
Applying Patient and Health Professional Preferences in Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid-Related Harm Among Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis.在共同设计数字简短干预措施以降低慢性非癌性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物相关伤害风险中应用患者和医疗专业人员的偏好:定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 25;9:e57212. doi: 10.2196/57212.
3
Diagnosing and managing prescription opioid use disorder in patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain in Australian general practice settings: a qualitative study using the theory of Planned Behaviour.在澳大利亚全科医疗环境中,针对开具阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的患者,使用计划行为理论对处方阿片类药物使用障碍进行诊断和管理:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 3;25(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02474-6.
4
Brief Psychological Interventions for Reducing Prescription Opioid Use, Related Harm, and Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Patient Interest.减轻慢性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物使用、相关危害及疼痛强度的简短心理干预:一项系统评价及患者兴趣评估
Clin J Pain. 2021 Apr 1;37(4):270-280. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000908.
5
Patients' and clinicians' perspectives of co-use of cannabis and opioids for chronic non-cancer pain management in primary care.患者和临床医生对在初级保健中同时使用大麻和阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌症疼痛的看法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Jan;63:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
Chronic non-cancer pain among adults with substance use disorders: Prevalence, characteristics, and association with opioid overdose and healthcare utilization.成年人物质使用障碍中的慢性非癌性疼痛:流行率、特征以及与阿片类药物过量和医疗保健利用的关联。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Apr 1;209:107902. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107902. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
7
Perspectives of pain specialists, patients, and family members on long-term opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain: a qualitative study.疼痛专家、患者和家属对慢性非癌性疼痛长期使用阿片类药物的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov 9;21(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01501-8.
8
A Conceptual Analysis of Opioid Use Disorder in Chronic Noncancer Pain Using Rodger's Evolutionary Approach.慢性非癌痛中阿片类药物使用障碍的概念分析:采用罗格的进化方法。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Aug;25(4):354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 May 9.
9
Concerns and Help-Seeking Among Patients Using Opioids for Management of Chronic Noncancer Pain.慢性非癌性疼痛患者使用阿片类药物治疗的担忧和寻求帮助。
Pain Med. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):758-769. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny078.
10
Primary care providers' experiences with urine toxicology tests to manage prescription opioid misuse and substance use among chronic noncancer pain patients in safety net health care settings.基层医疗服务提供者在安全网医疗环境中,针对慢性非癌性疼痛患者管理处方阿片类药物滥用和物质使用时进行尿液毒理学检测的经验。
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):154-60. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1132293.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying Patient and Health Professional Preferences in Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid-Related Harm Among Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis.在共同设计数字简短干预措施以降低慢性非癌性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物相关伤害风险中应用患者和医疗专业人员的偏好:定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 25;9:e57212. doi: 10.2196/57212.

本文引用的文献

1
Scale-up of Digital Innovations in Health Care: Expert Commentary on Enablers and Barriers.医疗保健领域数字创新的规模化:推动者和障碍因素的专家述评。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e24582. doi: 10.2196/24582.
2
General practitioners' attitudes towards opioids for non-cancer pain: a qualitative systematic review.全科医生对非癌性疼痛使用阿片类药物的态度:一项定性系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e054945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054945.
3
Using Co-design in Mobile Health System Development: A Qualitative Study With Experts in Co-design and Mobile Health System Development.
运用共同设计于移动医疗系统发展:与共同设计和移动医疗系统发展专家的定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 10;9(11):e27896. doi: 10.2196/27896.
4
Psychological Treatment for Chronic Pain: Improving Access and Integration.慢性疼痛的心理治疗:改善可及性与整合性
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2021 Sep;22(2):45-51. doi: 10.1177/15291006211033612.
5
At my own pace, space, and place: a systematic review of qualitative studies of enablers and barriers to telehealth interventions for people with chronic pain.按照我自己的节奏、空间和位置:对促进和阻碍慢性疼痛患者远程医疗干预的定性研究的系统评价。
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e165-e181. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002364.
6
Comparison of a Single-Session Pain Management Skills Intervention With a Single-Session Health Education Intervention and 8 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较单次疼痛管理技能干预与单次健康教育培训干预以及 8 次认知行为疗法对慢性下腰痛成人的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2113401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13401.
7
Short-term impact of combining pain neuroscience education with exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛中疼痛神经科学教育与运动相结合的短期影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain. 2022 Jan 1;163(1):e20-e30. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002308.
8
A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework.一种用于医疗保健创新的生成式协同设计框架:终端用户参与框架的开发与应用
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 1;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7.
9
Brief Psychological Interventions for Reducing Prescription Opioid Use, Related Harm, and Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Patient Interest.减轻慢性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物使用、相关危害及疼痛强度的简短心理干预:一项系统评价及患者兴趣评估
Clin J Pain. 2021 Apr 1;37(4):270-280. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000908.
10
Barriers and facilitators to patient uptake and utilisation of digital interventions for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic review of qualitative studies.阻碍和促进患者接受和利用数字干预措施进行低背痛自我管理的因素:定性研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e038800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038800.