• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于医疗保健创新的生成式协同设计框架:终端用户参与框架的开发与应用

A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework.

作者信息

Bird M, McGillion M, Chambers E M, Dix J, Fajardo C J, Gilmour M, Levesque K, Lim A, Mierdel S, Ouellette C, Polanski A N, Reaume S V, Whitmore C, Carter N

机构信息

School of Nursing, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

DigiComp Kids, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 1;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7
PMID:33648588
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7923456/
Abstract

Background Continual improvements to health systems, products, and services are necessary for improvements in health. However, many of these improvements are not incorporated into everyday practice. When designing new health systems, products, and services, involving members of the healthcare community and the public with personal healthcare experience can help to make sure that improvements will be useful and relevant to others like them. Methods Together with healthcare workers and family members with healthcare experience, we developed and applied a step-by-step guide to involving those with personal experience in the design of health system improvements. Results Our guide has three phases- 'Pre-Design', 'Co-Design', and 'Post-Design'. This paper describes each of these phases and illustrates how we applied them to our own project, which is to use virtual healthcare methods to improve care for children with chronic healthcare conditions and their families. In our own work, we found that healthcare workers and family members with personal healthcare experiences were able to use their knowledge and creativity to help us imagine how to improve care for children with chronic healthcare conditions and their families. We have created action items from these family member- and healthcare worker-identified needs, which we will use to shape our virtual healthcare system. Conclusions This paper may be useful for those seeking to involve members of the healthcare community and the public in the creation of better healthcare systems, products, and services. Background Challenges with the adoption, scale, and spread of health innovations represent significant gaps in the evidence-to-practice cycle. In the health innovation design process, a lack of attention paid to the needs of end-users, and subsequent tailoring of innovations to meet these needs, is a possible reason for this deficit. In the creative field of health innovation, which includes the design of healthcare products, systems (governance and organization mechanisms), and services (delivery mechanisms), a framework for both soliciting the needs of end-users and translating these needs into the design of health innovations is needed. Methods To address this gap, our team developed and applied a seven-step methodological framework, called A Generative Co-Design Framework for Healthcare Innovation. This framework was developed by an interdisciplinary team that included patient partners. Results This manuscript contributes a framework and applied exemplar for those seeking to engage end-users in the creative process of healthcare innovation. Through the stages of 'Pre-Design', 'Co-Design', and 'Post-Design', we were able to harness the creative insights of end-users, drawing on their experiences to shape a future state of care. Using an expository example of our own work, the DigiComp Kids project, we illustrate the application of each stage of the Framework. Conclusions A Generative Co-Design Framework for Healthcare Innovation provides healthcare innovators, applied health science researchers, clinicians, and quality improvement specialists with a guide to eliciting and incorporating the viewpoints of end-users while distilling practical considerations for healthcare innovation and design.

摘要

背景 卫生系统、产品和服务的持续改进对于健康状况的改善是必要的。然而,许多此类改进并未纳入日常实践。在设计新的卫生系统、产品和服务时,让医疗保健界成员和有个人医疗保健经验的公众参与进来,有助于确保这些改进对与他们类似的其他人有用且相关。方法 我们与有医疗保健经验的医护人员和家庭成员共同制定并应用了一份逐步指南,以让有个人经验的人员参与卫生系统改进设计。结果 我们的指南有三个阶段——“设计前”“共同设计”和“设计后”。本文描述了每个阶段,并说明了我们如何将其应用于我们自己的项目,即使用虚拟医疗方法改善对患有慢性疾病的儿童及其家庭的护理。在我们自己的工作中,我们发现有个人医疗保健经验的医护人员和家庭成员能够利用他们的知识和创造力,帮助我们设想如何改善对患有慢性疾病的儿童及其家庭的护理。我们根据这些家庭成员和医护人员确定的需求制定了行动项目,将用于塑造我们的虚拟医疗系统。结论 本文可能对那些寻求让医疗保健界成员和公众参与创建更好的卫生系统、产品和服务的人有用。背景 卫生创新的采用、规模和推广方面的挑战表明在证据到实践的循环中存在重大差距。在卫生创新设计过程中,对最终用户需求缺乏关注,以及随后未能根据这些需求调整创新,可能是造成这一差距的原因。在包括医疗保健产品、系统(治理和组织机制)和服务(提供机制)设计在内 的卫生创新的创造性领域,需要一个既征求最终用户需求又将这些需求转化为卫生创新设计的框架。方法 为了弥补这一差距,我们的团队开发并应用了一个七步方法框架,称为医疗保健创新生成性共同设计框架。该框架由一个包括患者伙伴的跨学科团队开发。结果 本手稿为那些寻求让最终用户参与医疗保健创新创造性过程的人提供了一个框架和应用范例。通过“设计前”“共同设计”和“设计后”阶段,我们能够利用最终用户的创造性见解,借鉴他们的经验来塑造未来的护理状态。我们以自己的工作——数字健康儿童项目为例,说明了该框架每个阶段的应用。结论 医疗保健创新生成性共同设计框架为医疗保健创新者、应用健康科学研究人员、临床医生和质量改进专家提供了一个指南,以引出并纳入最终用户的观点,同时提炼医疗保健创新和设计的实际考量因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec6/7923456/fa4de42c01af/40900_2021_252_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec6/7923456/fa4de42c01af/40900_2021_252_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec6/7923456/fa4de42c01af/40900_2021_252_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework.一种用于医疗保健创新的生成式协同设计框架:终端用户参与框架的开发与应用
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 1;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
Applying social innovation theory to examine how community co-designed health services develop: using a case study approach and mixed methods.应用社会创新理论审视社区共同设计的卫生服务如何发展:采用案例研究方法和混合研究方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 31;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2852-0.
5
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs.通过电子健康素养提高以消费者为中心的健康信息技术系统的有效性:理解用户需求的框架
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 May 20;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.3696.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
"The Road We Travel": Developing a co-produced narrative for a photovoice project.《我们走过的路》:为摄影展项目制作合作叙事。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):632-643. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12709. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
Experiences of multidisciplinary development team members during user-centered design of telecare products and services: a qualitative study.远程护理产品和服务以用户为中心设计过程中多学科开发团队成员的经验:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 19;16(5):e124. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3195.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Design Mapping: A Conceptual Framework for Co-Designing Evidence-Based Digital Mental Health Programs.设计映射:共同设计循证数字心理健康项目的概念框架。
Health Expect. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70385. doi: 10.1111/hex.70385.
2
Addressing online-facilitated stigma: a co-design workshop among patients with lived experiences of dyspareunia.应对网络助长的污名化:一场针对有性交疼痛亲身经历患者的联合设计研讨会。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 1;15(9):e092542. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092542.
3
Optimizing Participant Engagement in Cyberhealth Co-Design: Course-of-Action Framework Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.准备患者合作:患者伙伴参与和评估研究的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
2
The unpredictable journeys of spreading, sustaining and scaling healthcare innovations: a scoping review.传播、维持和扩大医疗保健创新的不可预测之旅:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Sep 13;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0482-6.
3
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.
优化网络健康协同设计中的参与者参与度:行动框架分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 27;12:e70772. doi: 10.2196/70772.
4
Insights into organizational health literacy in Italian hospitals: findings from the M-POHL network project.意大利医院组织健康素养洞察:M-POHL 网络项目的研究结果
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf137.
5
Risk Environments of Permanent Supportive Housing for Formerly Incarcerated People with Serious Mental Illnesses: A Protocol for a Novel Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.患有严重精神疾病的刑满释放人员永久性支持性住房的风险环境:一项新型混合方法可行性研究的方案
Int J Qual Methods. 2025 Jan-Dec;24. doi: 10.1177/16094069251337940. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
6
Wearable Technology, Smart Home Systems, and Mobile Apps for the Self‑Management of Patient Outcomes in Dementia Care: Systematic Review.用于痴呆症护理中患者结局自我管理的可穿戴技术、智能家居系统和移动应用程序:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 21;27:e65385. doi: 10.2196/65385.
7
Establishing a learning agenda for learning health system implementation and research in Canada.为加拿大学习型卫生系统的实施与研究制定学习议程。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0323499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323499. eCollection 2025.
8
Participatory Design: Addressing Speech-Language Pathologists' Challenges through Collaborative Interface Design.参与式设计:通过协作界面设计应对言语病理学家的挑战
Des Issues. 2025 Spring;41(2):44-59. doi: 10.1162/desi_a_00805. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
9
Virtual Backgrounds, Clinician Attire, and Patient Experience Preferences Among Individuals Receiving Telemedicine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.接受阿片类物质使用障碍远程医疗治疗的个体对虚拟背景、临床医生着装及患者体验的偏好
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jul 23;12:23743735251361584. doi: 10.1177/23743735251361584. eCollection 2025.
10
Co-design of a multifaceted intervention to improve quality handover of medicine information at discharge from hospital.共同设计一项多方面干预措施,以改善医院出院时药物信息的高质量交接。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12972-7.
支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
4
Co-design of eHealth Interventions With Children and Young People.与儿童和年轻人共同设计电子健康干预措施。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 18;9:481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00481. eCollection 2018.
5
Experience based co-design in acute healthcare services: a scoping review protocol.急性医疗服务中基于经验的协同设计:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Jan;17(1):3-9. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003655.
6
Beyond the Trial: Systematic Review of Real-World Uptake and Engagement With Digital Self-Help Interventions for Depression, Low Mood, or Anxiety.试验之外:对抑郁症、情绪低落或焦虑症数字自助干预措施的现实世界采用情况和参与度的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 6;20(6):e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9275.
7
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.患者和公众参与优先事项设定:文献系统快速综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018.
8
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
9
Openness, inclusion and transparency in the practice of public involvement in research: A reflective exercise to develop best practice recommendations.公开、包容和透明:公众参与研究实践的反思性实践,以制定最佳实践建议。
Health Expect. 2018 Apr;21(2):441-447. doi: 10.1111/hex.12609. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement.学会协同合作——一项关于公众参与的研究项目反思性分析的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x. eCollection 2017.