Freeman Jane, Sanders Ingrid M J G, Harmanus Céline, Clark Emma V, Berry Andrea M, Smits Wiep Klaas
Healthcare Associated Infections Research Group, University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group on Clostridioides difficile, Basel, Switzerland.
Experimental Bacteriology Research Group, Leiden University Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Jun;31(6):1011-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.01.028. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
Increasing resistance to antimicrobials used for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections necessitates reproducible antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Current guidelines take a one-size-fits-all approach and/or offer limited guidance. We investigated how the choice of medium affects measured MIC values across two sites.
We determined MIC values for the antimicrobials fidaxomicin, metronidazole, and vancomycin for a representative collection of European C. difficile strains (n = 235) using agar dilution on three different media: Brucella Blood Agar (BBA), Fastidious Anaerobe Agar supplemented with horse blood (FAA-HB), and Wilkins-Chalgren (WC) agar. The study was conducted at two sites to compare reproducibility. Usability (ease of preparation of the media as well as read-out of the assay) was assessed through a survey.
We found that all media result in highly consistent aggregated MIC data for all antibiotics, with MIC and MIC within two-fold of each other across sites. For fidaxomin, MIC values on WC were lower than on the other media (MIC: WC = 0.125-0.25 mg/L; BBA and FAA-HB = 0.5 mg/L). Metronidazole showed the lowest MIC on BBA and the highest on WC (MIC: WC = 2 mg/L; BBA = 0.5-1 mg/L; FAA-HB: 1-2 mg/L). For vancomycin, MIC values were similar across media (MIC: all media = 1-2 mg/L). Though absolute values for individual isolates differed between sites, identified resistant isolates were similar. Results obtained on FAA-HB were most consistent between sites and results obtained on WC showed the most divergence. FAA-HB was positively evaluated in the usability survey.
This study shows medium-dependent differences in C. difficile MICs for at least two antimicrobials across two sites. We suggest the use of FAA-HB to align with general European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria and deposited reference strains for standard susceptibility testing of C. difficile to increase interlaboratory reproducibility.
用于治疗艰难梭菌感染的抗菌药物耐药性不断增加,这就需要可重复的抗菌药物敏感性试验。当前指南采用一刀切的方法和/或提供的指导有限。我们研究了培养基的选择如何影响两个地点测得的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值。
我们使用琼脂稀释法,在三种不同的培养基上,即布鲁氏菌血琼脂(BBA)、补充马血的苛求厌氧菌琼脂(FAA-HB)和威尔金斯-查尔格伦(WC)琼脂,测定了欧洲艰难梭菌代表性菌株(n = 235)对非达霉素、甲硝唑和万古霉素的MIC值。该研究在两个地点进行,以比较重复性。通过一项调查评估了可用性(培养基的制备难易程度以及试验的读数)。
我们发现,所有培养基对所有抗生素产生的汇总MIC数据高度一致,各地点之间的MIC相差不超过两倍。对于非达霉素,WC上的MIC值低于其他培养基(MIC:WC = 0.125 - 0.25 mg/L;BBA和FAA-HB = 0.5 mg/L)。甲硝唑在BBA上的MIC最低,在WC上最高(MIC:WC = 2 mg/L;BBA = 0.5 - 1 mg/L;FAA-HB:1 - 2 mg/L)。对于万古霉素,各培养基上的MIC值相似(MIC:所有培养基 = 1 - 2 mg/L)。尽管各地点单个分离株的绝对值不同,但鉴定出的耐药分离株相似。在FAA-HB上获得的结果在各地点之间最一致,而在WC上获得的结果差异最大。FAA-HB在可用性调查中得到了积极评价。
本研究表明,在两个地点,至少两种抗菌药物对艰难梭菌的MIC存在培养基依赖性差异。我们建议使用FAA-HB,以符合欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)关于厌氧菌敏感性试验的一般建议,并使用保存的参考菌株进行艰难梭菌标准敏感性试验,以提高实验室间的重复性。