• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

查尔森合并症指数对预测感染新冠肺炎的养老院居民的死亡风险没有额外价值。

Charlson comorbidity index has no incremental value for mortality risk prediction in nursing home residents with COVID-19 disease.

作者信息

Zahra Anum, van Smeden Maarten, Elders Petra J M, Festen Jan, Gussekloo Jacobijn, Joling Karlijn J, van Loon Anouk, Luijken Kim, Melis René J F, Mooijaart Simon P, Moons Karel G M, Peeters Geeske, Polinder-Bos Harmke A, Wouters Fenne, de Hond Anne

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05721-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-025-05721-2
PMID:39885429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11780814/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing home (NH) residents faced the highest risk of severe COVID-19 disease and mortality. Due to their frailty status, comorbidity burden can serve as a useful predictive indicator of vulnerability in this frail population. However, the prognostic value of these cumulative comorbidity scores like the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) remained unclear in this population. We evaluated the incremental predictive value of the CCI for predicting 28-day mortality in NH residents with COVID-19, compared to prediction using age and sex only.

METHODS

We included older individuals of ≥ 70 years of age in a large retrospective observational cohort across NHs in the Netherlands. Individuals with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from 1 March 2020 to 31 December 2021 were included. The CCI score was computed by searching for the comorbidities recorded in the electronic patient records. All-cause mortality within 28 days was predicted using logistic regression based on age and sex only (base model) and by adding the CCI to the base model (CCI model). The predictive performance of the base model and the CCI model were compared visually by the distribution of predicted risks and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), scaled Brier score, and calibration slope.

RESULTS

A total of 4318 older NH residents were included in this study with a median age of 88 years [IQR: 83-93] and a median CCI score of 6 [IQR: 5-7]. 1357 (31%) residents died within 28 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. The base model, with age and sex as predictors, had an AUROC of 0.61 (CI: 0.60 to 0.63), a scaled brier score of 0.03 (CI: 0.02 to 0.04), and a calibration slope of 0.97 (CI: 0.83 to 1.13). The addition of CCI did not improve these predictive performance measures.

CONCLUSION

The addition of the CCI as a vulnerability indicator did not improve short-term mortality prediction in NH residents. Similar (high) age and number of comorbidities in the NH population could reduce the effectiveness of these predictors, emphasizing the need for other population-specific predictors that can be utilized in the frail NH residents.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,养老院居民面临感染新冠病毒后病情严重及死亡的最高风险。由于他们身体虚弱,合并症负担可作为这一脆弱人群易感性的有效预测指标。然而,像查尔森合并症指数(CCI)这类累积合并症评分在该人群中的预后价值仍不明确。我们评估了CCI对预测新冠病毒感染养老院居民28天死亡率的增量预测价值,并与仅使用年龄和性别进行预测的情况作比较。

方法

我们纳入了荷兰养老院中年龄≥70岁的老年人,组成一个大型回顾性观察队列。纳入2020年3月1日至2021年12月31日期间新冠病毒核酸检测确诊的个体。通过在电子病历中搜索记录的合并症来计算CCI评分。仅基于年龄和性别(基础模型)以及在基础模型中加入CCI(CCI模型),使用逻辑回归预测28天内的全因死亡率。通过预测风险分布、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、标准化Brier评分和校准斜率直观比较基础模型和CCI模型的预测性能。

结果

本研究共纳入4318名老年养老院居民,中位年龄为88岁[四分位间距:83 - 93],中位CCI评分为6[四分位间距:5 - 7]。1357名(31%)居民在新冠病毒诊断后28天内死亡。以年龄和性别作为预测因素的基础模型,AUROC为0.61(95%置信区间:0.60至0.63),标准化Brier评分为0.03(95%置信区间:0.02至0.04),校准斜率为0.97(95%置信区间:0.83至1.13)。加入CCI并未改善这些预测性能指标。

结论

将CCI作为易感性指标并不能改善养老院居民的短期死亡率预测。养老院人群中相似的(高龄)年龄和合并症数量可能会降低这些预测因素的有效性,这凸显了需要其他可用于身体虚弱的养老院居民的特定人群预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4133/11780814/042f7896da79/12877_2025_5721_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4133/11780814/83986ac31d3c/12877_2025_5721_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4133/11780814/042f7896da79/12877_2025_5721_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4133/11780814/83986ac31d3c/12877_2025_5721_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4133/11780814/042f7896da79/12877_2025_5721_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Charlson comorbidity index has no incremental value for mortality risk prediction in nursing home residents with COVID-19 disease.查尔森合并症指数对预测感染新冠肺炎的养老院居民的死亡风险没有额外价值。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05721-2.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
4
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.生物标志物对改良心脏风险指数在预测非心脏手术患者主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率方面的比较和附加预后价值。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.为照顾居住在长期护理机构中的60岁及以上老人的医护人员接种流感疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 27;2(2):CD005187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Protective Measures Taken in Residential Care Homes in England During the COVID-19 Pandemic. An Assessment of the Change in Mortality Rates Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Years.英国新冠疫情期间养老院采取的防护措施。对新冠疫情前及疫情期间死亡率变化的评估。
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01183-6.
9
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
10
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
2
Limited incremental predictive value of the frailty index and other vulnerability measures from routine care data for mortality risk prediction in older patients with COVID-19 in primary care.在初级保健中,对 COVID-19 老年患者进行死亡率风险预测,常规护理数据中的虚弱指数和其他脆弱性指标的增量预测能力有限。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Feb 23;25(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02308-5.
3
External validation of six COVID-19 prognostic models for predicting mortality risk in older populations in a hospital, primary care, and nursing home setting.
在医院、初级保健和疗养院环境中,对 6 种用于预测老年人群死亡率风险的 COVID-19 预后模型进行外部验证。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;168:111270. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111270. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
4
COVID-19 in a Dutch Nursing Home: A Longitudinal Retrospective Care-Home-Level Case Study on Infection Rate, Survival Rate, and Daily Functioning.荷兰一家养老院中的新型冠状病毒肺炎:一项关于感染率、生存率和日常功能的纵向回顾性养老院层面案例研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):149. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010149.
5
COVID-19 infection rate and mortality in a local health authority in Italy: Differences between home-dwelling and residential older adults.意大利某地方卫生当局辖区内的新冠病毒感染率及死亡率:居家老年人与住养老院老年人之间的差异
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Nov 4;6:100448. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100448. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Multiple long term conditions, multimorbidity, and co-morbidities: we should reconsider the terminology we use.多种长期病症、共病和合并症:我们应该重新审视我们所使用的术语。
BMJ. 2023 Oct 13;383:2327. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p2327.
7
Predictors of COVID‑19‑associated mortality among hospitalized elderly patients with dementia.住院老年痴呆患者中与COVID-19相关死亡率的预测因素
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Jul 3;26(2):395. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12094. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Comorbidities, multimorbidity and COVID-19.合并症、多重疾病与2019冠状病毒病
Nat Med. 2023 Feb;29(2):334-343. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02156-9. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
9
Beyond Chronological Age: A Multidimensional Approach to Survival Prediction in Older Adults.超越年龄界限:一种预测老年人生存的多维方法。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Jan 26;78(1):158-166. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac186.
10
Association of Obesity With COVID-19 Severity and Mortality: An Updated Systemic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.肥胖与 COVID-19 严重程度和死亡率的关联:一项更新的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 3;13:780872. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.780872. eCollection 2022.