Suppr超能文献

零屈光度人工晶状体的结果:对角膜曲率指数和眼轴长度的见解。

Outcomes of zero power intraocular lenses: insights into the keratometric index and axial length.

作者信息

Melles Ronald B, Cooke David L, Olsen Thomas

机构信息

From The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California (Melles); Great Lakes Eye Care, S. Joseph, Michigan (Cooke); Aros Private Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (Olsen).

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 May 1;51(5):388-393. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001624.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a series of patients with a zero diopter power implant to bypass the estimated lens plane, an important variable in normal IOL calculation.

SETTING

Large multicenter group practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients undergoing cataract surgery after optical biometry and implantation of a zero (0.0 diopter [D]) power IOL were studied. Complete biometry was performed with an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. The predicted refraction was calculated with and without recalibrating the axial length (AL) using a sum-of-segments (SOS) approach with the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and Olsen formulas. A ray-tracing model to back-calculate the corneal power from the observed postoperative refraction and AL was also included.

RESULTS

In 52 eyes of 52 patients, mean prediction errors for the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and the Olsen formulas were +1.48 D, +1.15 D, +0.91 D, +0.65 D, +0.15 D, and +0.11 D, respectively using standard AL, and after SOS correction of the AL, the mean errors changed to +1.08 D, +0.75 D, +0.52 D, +0.26 D, -0.25 D, and -0.27 D, respectively. The mean back-calculated corneal power was 1.25 D lower than the mean keratometer reading using the standard keratometric index of 1.3375 and corresponded to an effective index of 1.328.

CONCLUSIONS

The hyperopic error commonly seen in highly myopic eyes with classic thin-lens formulas is only partly corrected by SOS recalibration of the AL. We suggest the source of the residual error is an incorrect keratometric index.

摘要

目的

分析一系列植入零屈光度人工晶状体以绕过预估晶状体平面(正常人工晶状体计算中的一个重要变量)的患者的人工晶状体屈光度计算。

设置

大型多中心团体执业机构。

设计

回顾性观察研究。

方法

对一系列在进行光学生物测量并植入零(0.0屈光度[D])屈光度人工晶状体后接受白内障手术的患者进行研究。使用光学低相干反射测量生物测量仪进行完整的生物测量。使用霍夫尔Q、霍拉迪1、SRK/T、海吉斯、巴雷特通用II和奥尔森公式,通过分段求和(SOS)方法,在不重新校准眼轴长度(AL)和重新校准AL的情况下计算预测屈光度。还纳入了一个光线追踪模型,用于根据观察到的术后屈光度和AL反推角膜屈光度。

结果

在52例患者的52只眼中,使用标准AL时,霍夫尔Q、霍拉迪1、SRK/T、海吉斯、巴雷特通用II和奥尔森公式的平均预测误差分别为+1.48 D、+1.15 D、+0.91 D、+0.65 D、+0.15 D和+0.11 D,在对AL进行SOS校正后,平均误差分别变为+1.08 D、+0.75 D、+0.52 D、+0.26 D、 -0.25 D和 -0.27 D。使用标准角膜曲率计指数1.3375时,平均反推角膜屈光度比平均角膜曲率计读数低1.25 D,对应的有效指数为1.328。

结论

经典薄透镜公式在高度近视眼常见的远视误差仅通过对AL进行SOS重新校准得到部分校正。我们认为残余误差的来源是角膜曲率计指数不正确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验