Ndaba N, Govender P, Naidoo D
Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Occup Ther Int. 2025 Jan 22;2025:8801110. doi: 10.1155/oti/8801110. eCollection 2025.
The application of the person-environment-occupation-performance (PEOP) model in occupational therapy education offers valuable insights into the interaction between person, environment, and occupational factors and how these elements influenced the strategies used to adapt and navigate the transformation of health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored how individual characteristics, contextual demands, and the nature of educational occupations shaped the adaptation and performance of educators and students. The study used a qualitative, exploratory research design at a public higher education institution (HEI) in South Africa, focusing on the occupational therapy program. Purposive sampling was used to recruit key participants ( = 44), including management, academic educators, clinical supervisors (academics), academic support educators, and occupational therapy students. Data collection occurred via the Zoom platform for 45-60-min semistructured interviews. Thematic analysis, guided by the PEOP model, was employed to analyze qualitative data, which was recorded, transcribed, and coded using NVivo (Version 12 Pro). The study ensured trustworthiness and adherence to ethical principles. The PEOP model was used as a framework to formulate the themes, namely, (1) person, (2) environment, (3) occupation, (4) occupational performance, and (5) occupational performance and participation. In the context of occupational therapy education, particular emphasis was placed on the adaptations and responses of educators and students as they navigated the demands of their educational occupations during the pandemic. The curriculum underwent rapid adjustments, requiring theoretical instruction and clinical practice modifications. These changes posed significant challenges and highlighted pre-existing gaps within HEIs, as experienced by educators and students. This study highlighted the importance of supporting optimal occupational performance among educators and students, emphasizing the necessity of providing adequate resources and support. This ensures the well-being of educators and students, enabling effective engagement and participation as they navigate the evolving educational landscape.
人-环境-职业表现(PEOP)模型在职业治疗教育中的应用,为理解人、环境和职业因素之间的相互作用,以及这些因素如何影响在新冠疫情期间适应和推动健康职业教育转型所采用的策略,提供了宝贵的见解。本研究探讨了个体特征、情境需求和教育职业的性质如何塑造教育工作者和学生的适应能力与表现。该研究采用定性、探索性研究设计,以南非一所公立高等教育机构(HEI)的职业治疗项目为重点。采用目的抽样法招募关键参与者(n = 44),包括管理人员、学术教育工作者、临床督导(学者)、学术支持教育工作者和职业治疗专业学生。通过Zoom平台进行45至60分钟的半结构化访谈来收集数据。在PEOP模型的指导下,采用主题分析法对定性数据进行分析,这些数据使用NVivo(版本12专业版)进行记录、转录和编码。该研究确保了可信度并遵循伦理原则。PEOP模型被用作构建主题的框架,即:(1)人,(2)环境,(3)职业,(4)职业表现,以及(5)职业表现与参与。在职业治疗教育背景下,特别强调了教育工作者和学生在疫情期间应对其教育职业需求时的适应与反应。课程进行了快速调整,需要对理论教学和临床实践进行修改。这些变化带来了重大挑战,并凸显了高等教育机构中教育工作者和学生所经历的既有差距。本研究强调了支持教育工作者和学生实现最佳职业表现的重要性,强调了提供充足资源和支持的必要性。这确保了教育工作者和学生的福祉,使他们在应对不断变化的教育环境时能够有效地参与其中。