Ching Brian C F, Downs Johnny, Zhang Shuo, Abdul Cader Hannah, Penhallow Jessica, Voraite Elvina, Popnikolova Teodora, Wickersham Alice, Parlatini Valeria, Simonoff Emily
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 30. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14117.
Systematic reviews have suggested mixed effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of children and young people. However, most included studies focused on the general population and were cross-sectional. The long-term impact on those with pre-existing mental health and/or neurodevelopmental conditions remains unclear. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the longitudinal impact of the pandemic on the mental health of this clinical population and potential explanatory factors.
Ovid Medline, Embase, APA PsycInfo and Global Health databases were searched between 1 January 2020 and 3 August 2023 (PROSPERO CRD42022383546). We included longitudinal studies that compared mental health symptoms between pre- and during pandemic and/or during pandemic timepoints in children and young people (≤18 years old) with pre-existing mental and/or neurodevelopmental conditions. Outcomes included internalising, externalising and other symptoms. Risk of bias was rated using an adapted tool. Included studies were narratively synthesised and multi-level meta-analyses were conducted where the number of studies was sufficient.
We identified 21 studies (N = 2,617) from 6,083 records. Studies differed across countries, diagnoses, measures, informants and timepoints. All had overall moderate-to-high risk of bias. Narrative synthesis found mixed evidence of symptom change, with individual studies showing increase/reduction/no change. Factors such as diagnosis, baseline symptom severity, age and sex/gender may explain variation in outcomes. Multi-level meta-analyses were feasible for a limited number of outcomes and found no significant changes in internalising and externalising symptoms pre- versus during pandemic or internalising symptoms between 2020 pandemic phases, and high heterogeneity was noted.
The impact of the pandemic on the mental health of children and young people with pre-existing conditions varied according to individual and contextual vulnerabilities, which were not fully captured in pooled analyses. Further research needs to investigate longer-term impacts and better stratify this vulnerable population.
系统评价表明,新冠疫情对儿童和青少年心理健康的影响好坏参半。然而,大多数纳入研究关注的是普通人群,且为横断面研究。疫情对已有心理健康和/或神经发育疾病患者的长期影响仍不明确。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究疫情对这一临床人群心理健康的纵向影响及潜在解释因素。
于2020年1月1日至2023年8月3日检索了Ovid Medline、Embase、APA PsycInfo和全球健康数据库(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022383546)。我们纳入了纵向研究,这些研究比较了疫情前与疫情期间和/或疫情期间各时间点,患有心理健康和/或神经发育疾病的儿童和青少年(≤18岁)的心理健康症状。结局包括内化症状、外化症状和其他症状。使用一种改编工具对偏倚风险进行评级。对纳入研究进行叙述性综合分析,并在研究数量足够时进行多层次荟萃分析。
我们从6083条记录中识别出21项研究(N = 2617)。研究在国家、诊断、测量方法、报告者和时间点等方面存在差异。所有研究总体偏倚风险为中度至高度。叙述性综合分析发现症状变化的证据不一,个别研究显示症状增加/减少/无变化。诊断、基线症状严重程度、年龄和性别等因素可能解释结局的差异。对有限数量的结局进行多层次荟萃分析是可行的,结果发现疫情前与疫情期间内化症状和外化症状无显著变化,2020年疫情各阶段内化症状也无显著变化,且异质性较高。
疫情对已有疾病的儿童和青少年心理健康的影响因个体和环境脆弱性而异,汇总分析未能完全体现这些差异。需要进一步研究调查长期影响,并更好地对这一脆弱人群进行分层。