Thi Le Thanh-Hiep, Gómez-Orellana Pablo, Ortuño Manuel Angel
Centro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Jenaro de la Fuente s/n, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Departamento de Química Física, Universidad de Alicante, 03080, Alicante, Spain.
Chemphyschem. 2025 Apr 14;26(8):e202400588. doi: 10.1002/cphc.202400588. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
Zr-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are typically employed in heterogeneous catalysis due to their porosity, chemical and thermal stability, and well-defined active sites. Density functional theory (DFT) is the workhorse to compute their electronic structure; however, it becomes very costly when dealing with reaction mechanisms involving large unit cells and vast configurational spaces. Semiempirical quantum mechanical (SQM) methods appear as an alternative approach to simulate such chemical systems at low computational cost, but their feasibility to model catalysis with MOFs is still unexplored. Thus, here we present a benchmark study on UiO-66 to evaluate the performance of SQM methods (PM6, PM7, GFN1-xTB, GFN2-xTB) against hybrid DFT (M06). We evaluate defective nodes, ligand exchange reactions, barrier heights, and host-guest interactions with metal nanoclusters. Despite some caveats, GFN1-xTB on properly constrained models is the best SQM method across all studied properties. Under proper supervision, this protocol holds promise for application in exploratory high-throughput screenings of Zr-based MOF catalysts, subject to further refinement with more accurate methods.
基于锆的金属有机框架材料(MOFs)因其孔隙率、化学和热稳定性以及明确的活性位点,通常用于多相催化。密度泛函理论(DFT)是计算其电子结构的主要方法;然而,在处理涉及大晶胞和大量构型空间的反应机理时,计算成本变得非常高。半经验量子力学(SQM)方法作为一种以低计算成本模拟此类化学体系的替代方法出现,但其用于模拟MOFs催化的可行性仍未得到探索。因此,在此我们对UiO-66进行了一项基准研究,以评估SQM方法(PM6、PM7、GFN1-xTB、GFN2-xTB)相对于混合DFT(M06)的性能。我们评估了缺陷节点、配体交换反应、势垒高度以及与金属纳米团簇的主客体相互作用。尽管存在一些注意事项,但在适当约束的模型上,GFN1-xTB是所有研究性质中最佳的SQM方法。在适当监督下,该方案有望应用于基于锆的MOF催化剂的探索性高通量筛选,但需用更精确的方法进一步完善。