• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与SOPHIA预测工具相比,减肥手术后的实际体重减轻轨迹:一项观察性比较研究。

Actual weight loss trajectories after bariatric surgery compared with the SOPHIA prediction tool: An observational comparison study.

作者信息

Sankar Adhithya, McNeilage Caitlin, Alkhaffaf Bilal, Syed Akheel A

机构信息

Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Obesity Medicine, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

Department of Oesophago-Gastric and Bariatric Surgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Apr;27(4):2206-2213. doi: 10.1111/dom.16219. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1111/dom.16219
PMID:39887840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11885069/
Abstract

AIMS

Estimation of post-bariatric surgery weight loss is important for informed clinical decisions, yet existing predictive models lack accuracy and reliability. We assessed the effectiveness of the validated Stratification of Obesity Phenotypes to Optimize Future Therapy (SOPHIA) bariatric weight trajectory prediction tool in our patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 178 adults who underwent bariatric surgery over a 3-year period. Actual weights at baseline and annually over 5 years of follow-up were compared with predicted weights to calculate mean difference and median absolute deviation (MAD).

RESULTS

The study comprised 157 women (88.2%) and 21 men (11.8%) with mean (standard deviation) age of 46.9 (10.6) years and baseline weight of 138.4 (23.5) kg. The bariatric surgical procedures included 148 (83.1%) gastric bypass, 19 (10.7%) sleeve gastrectomy and 11 (6.2%) gastric band operations. The proportion of patients with actual weights within the prediction interquartile range (IQR) was 50.7%, 43.2% and 38.8% at 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. The mean difference between actual and predicted weight at 60 months was 0.6 (16.7) kg, p = 0.654 (paired t test). The mean MAD at 60 months was 12.9 (95% CI, 11.3-14.4) kg, indicating moderate predictive utility. The predictive accuracy was highest for gastric bypass. Subgroup analysis revealed greater accuracy in patients without diabetes/pre-diabetes, and in nonsmokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The SOPHIA study tool provides accurate postoperative weight forecasts for some subgroups of patients, but its precision diminishes with time. This study reiterates the necessity for better personalized weight prediction tools to inform bariatric surgery decision-making.

摘要

目的

评估减重手术后的体重减轻情况对于做出明智的临床决策很重要,但现有的预测模型缺乏准确性和可靠性。我们评估了经过验证的肥胖表型分层以优化未来治疗(SOPHIA)减重体重轨迹预测工具在我们患者群体中的有效性。

材料与方法

我们对178名在3年期间接受减重手术的成年人进行了一项回顾性研究。将基线时以及随访5年期间每年的实际体重与预测体重进行比较,以计算平均差异和中位数绝对偏差(MAD)。

结果

该研究包括157名女性(88.2%)和21名男性(11.8%),平均(标准差)年龄为46.9(10.6)岁,基线体重为138.4(23.5)千克。减重手术方式包括148例(83.1%)胃旁路手术、19例(10.7%)袖状胃切除术和11例(6.2%)胃束带手术。实际体重处于预测四分位间距(IQR)内的患者比例在12、24和60个月时分别为50.7%、43.2%和38.8%。60个月时实际体重与预测体重的平均差异为0.6(16.7)千克,p = 0.654(配对t检验)。60个月时的平均MAD为l2.9(95%CI,11.3 - 14.4)千克,表明具有中等预测效用。胃旁路手术的预测准确性最高。亚组分析显示,无糖尿病/糖尿病前期患者和非吸烟者的预测准确性更高。

结论

SOPHIA研究工具为部分患者亚组提供了准确的术后体重预测,但随着时间推移其精度会降低。本研究重申了需要更好的个性化体重预测工具来为减重手术决策提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65b/11885069/2d5e9cba218f/DOM-27-2206-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65b/11885069/88567e49f6d3/DOM-27-2206-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65b/11885069/2d5e9cba218f/DOM-27-2206-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65b/11885069/88567e49f6d3/DOM-27-2206-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65b/11885069/2d5e9cba218f/DOM-27-2206-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Actual weight loss trajectories after bariatric surgery compared with the SOPHIA prediction tool: An observational comparison study.与SOPHIA预测工具相比,减肥手术后的实际体重减轻轨迹:一项观察性比较研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Apr;27(4):2206-2213. doi: 10.1111/dom.16219. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.
3
Prepregnancy Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.孕前 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术:产科和新生儿结局的系统评价、成对比较和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jun;5(6):100914. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100914. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
4
Surgery for obesity.肥胖症手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub3.
5
Review of meta-analytic comparisons of bariatric surgery with a focus on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.肥胖症手术的荟萃分析比较综述,重点关注腹腔镜可调节胃束带术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May-Jun;4(3 Suppl):S47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.04.007.
6
Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术与袖状胃切除术患者代谢结局的比较——一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jul 5;148:w14633. doi: 10.57187/smw.2018.14633. eCollection 2018.
7
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
8
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.25kg/m2≤BMI<35kg/m2 的 2 型糖尿病患者行减重手术的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2021 Dec;31(12):5312-5321. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05725-y. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery-extension 2022.EAES 快速指南:系统评价、网络荟萃分析、CINeMA 和 GRADE 评估以及 2022 年肥胖手术扩展的欧洲共识。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1709-1725. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09008-0. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults.全球范围内 1990 年至 2022 年体重不足和肥胖趋势:对 3663 项具有 2.22 亿儿童、青少年和成年人代表性的人群研究进行的汇总分析。
Lancet. 2024 Mar 16;403(10431):1027-1050. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
The impact of the bougie size and the extent of antral resection on weight-loss and postoperative complications following sleeve gastrectomy: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry.球囊大小和胃窦切除范围对袖状胃切除术后减重和术后并发症的影响:来自斯堪的纳维亚肥胖手术登记处的结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Feb;20(2):139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.014. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
3
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning-based calculator for predicting 5-year weight trajectories after bariatric surgery: a multinational retrospective cohort SOPHIA study.基于可解释机器学习的预测减重手术后 5 年体重轨迹计算器的开发和验证:一项多中心回顾性队列 SOPHIA 研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Oct;5(10):e692-e702. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00135-8. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
4
Microvascular complications of obesity and diabetes-Role of bariatric surgery.肥胖和糖尿病的微血管并发症-减重手术的作用。
Obes Rev. 2023 Oct;24(10):e13602. doi: 10.1111/obr.13602. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
5
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, gastric banding, or sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: Baseline data from the By-Band-Sleeve randomized controlled trial.用于严重肥胖的 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术、胃束带术或袖状胃切除术:来自 By-Band-Sleeve 随机对照试验的基线数据。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 May;31(5):1290-1299. doi: 10.1002/oby.23746.
6
Weight Loss Prediction after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.代谢与减重手术后的体重减轻预测
J Obes Metab Syndr. 2023 Mar 30;32(1):46-54. doi: 10.7570/jomes23008. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
7
Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery: Scope of the Problem, Causes, Prevention, and Treatment.减重手术后体重反弹:问题范围、原因、预防和治疗。
Curr Diab Rep. 2023 Mar;23(3):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01498-z. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
8
Decreased Weight Loss Following Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者行减重手术后体重减轻减少。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jan;33(1):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06350-z. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
9
Early Postoperative Weight Loss Predicts Weight Loss up to 5 Years After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, Banded Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, and Sleeve Gastrectomy.术后早期体重减轻可预测 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术、带袖套的 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术 5 年后的体重减轻。
Obes Surg. 2022 Sep;32(9):2891-2902. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06166-x. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
10
Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives.人工智能在减重手术中的应用:现状与未来展望。
Obes Surg. 2022 Aug;32(8):2772-2783. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06146-1. Epub 2022 Jun 17.