Shen Jincheng, Sarwal Amara, Singh Ravinder, Hartsell Sydney E, Wei Guo, Nevers McKenna, Christensen Jesse C, Takyi Augustine, Katkam Niharika, Derington Catherine G, Deshmukh Vikrant G, Boucher Robert E, Drakos Stavros G, Greene Tom, Beddhu Srinivasan
Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Apr;27(4):2120-2130. doi: 10.1111/dom.16207. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
To compare the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events in new users of insulin glargine, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), particularly in subgroups defined by baseline haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), body mass index (BMI) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
We conducted an active comparator, new user design study in a national cohort of 161 405 veterans with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin and initiated insulin glargine (n = 54 375), GLP-1RA (n = 22 145) or SGLT2i (n = 84 885) between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. Patients were followed until 31 March 2023. Inverse probability weighted Cox regression models were used for treatment comparisons on all-cause deaths and cardiovascular events in the entire cohort and above subgroups.
There were 20 788 cardiovascular events/414 414 person-years and 15 268 all-cause deaths/446 458 person-years. Insulin glargine had a higher hazard of all-cause death compared to GLP-1RA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-1.67) or SGLT2i (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.48-1.61) in the entire cohort and across subgroups, especially in those with HbA1C levels <9.0%. Results were similar for secondary outcomes. Compared to GLP-1RA, SGLT2i had similar risk of all-cause death (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.10) but higher hazard of cardiovascular events (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19). Across subgroups, GLP-1RA and SGLT2i had generally similar effects, with SGLT2i showing a slightly higher risk in some cases.
Insulin glargine might be deleterious particularly in those with HbA1C <9.0%. There was no clear evidence for prioritization of SGLT2i versus GLP-1RA across subgroups.
比较甘精胰岛素、胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)新使用者的全因死亡风险和心血管事件风险,特别是在根据基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)、体重指数(BMI)和估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)定义的亚组中。
我们在一个全国性队列中开展了一项活性对照、新使用者设计研究,该队列由161405名使用二甲双胍的2型糖尿病(T2D)退伍军人组成,他们在2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间开始使用甘精胰岛素(n = 54375)、GLP-1RA(n = 22145)或SGLT2i(n = 84885)。对患者进行随访至2023年3月31日。采用逆概率加权Cox回归模型对整个队列及上述亚组中的全因死亡和心血管事件进行治疗比较。
共有20788例心血管事件/414414人年,15268例全因死亡/446458人年。在整个队列及各亚组中,尤其是HbA1C水平<9.0%的患者中,甘精胰岛素的全因死亡风险高于GLP-1RA(风险比[HR]1.57,95%置信区间[CI]1.48 - 1.67)或SGLT2i(HR 1.55,95% CI 1.48 - 1.61)。次要结局的结果相似。与GLP-1RA相比,SGLT2i的全因死亡风险相似(HR 1.03,95% CI 0.97 - 1.10),但心血管事件风险更高(HR 1.13,95% CI 1.08 - 1.19)。在各亚组中,GLP-1RA和SGLT2i的效果总体相似,SGLT2i在某些情况下风险略高。
甘精胰岛素可能有害,尤其是在HbA1C<9.0%的患者中。在各亚组中,没有明确证据表明SGLT2i相对于GLP-1RA具有优先地位。