Madali-Kafes Berna, Parlak-Yetisen Lütfiye, Dikmen Derya
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Sci Food Agric. 2025 May;105(7):3753-3759. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.14162. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Encapsulation technology has been extensively employed in recent years to enhance the efficacy and efficiency of probiotics. Nevertheless, existing studies have primarily concentrated on product efficacy, with inadequate scrutiny concerning potential effects on living organisms. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of various encapsulated probiotic strains on inflammatory responses in healthy mice, alongside their in vitro viability. Nissle (EcN) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) were microencapsulated for the study.
The differences in serum levels of Total Oxidant Status, Total Antioxidant Status, and C-reactive protein among the groups were statistically significant (LGG, P = 0.039, P = 0.024, and P < 0.001; EcN, P = 0.019, P = 0.012, and P = 0.037, respectively). The highest levels were found in the control group, while the lowest levels were observed in the microencapsulated group. There were no significant differences in tissue tumor necrosis factor or interleukin-6 levels for either LGG or EcN.
Probiotics reduced inflammation-related parameters in serum of healthy mice. Microencapsulation preserved viability in vitro, but in vivo no significant differences were observed in anti-inflammatory parameters or body weight between microencapsulated and free probiotics. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
近年来,包封技术已被广泛应用于提高益生菌的功效和效率。然而,现有研究主要集中在产品功效上,对其对生物体潜在影响的审查不足。本研究旨在评估各种包封益生菌菌株对健康小鼠炎症反应的影响及其体外活力。为此,将Nissle(EcN)和鼠李糖乳杆菌GG(LGG)进行了微包封。
各组之间总氧化状态、总抗氧化状态和C反应蛋白的血清水平差异具有统计学意义(LGG组,P分别为0.039、0.024和P<0.001;EcN组,P分别为0.019、0.012和0.037)。对照组水平最高,微包封组水平最低。LGG或EcN的组织肿瘤坏死因子或白细胞介素-6水平无显著差异。
益生菌降低了健康小鼠血清中与炎症相关的参数。微包封在体外保持了活力,但在体内,微包封益生菌和游离益生菌之间在抗炎参数或体重方面未观察到显著差异。©2025作者。由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表化学工业协会出版的《食品与农业科学杂志》。