Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的患病率

The Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Chitturi Kalyan R, Kumar Sant, Frisancho Flavia Tejada, Rahman Sana, Verma Beni Rai, Cellamare Matteo, Merdler Ilan, Ozturk Sevket Tolga, Cermak Vijoli, Sawant Vaishnavi, Zhang Cheng, Ben-Dor Itsik, Waksman Ron, Hashim Hayder D, Case Brian C

机构信息

Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr;105(5):1120-1123. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31429. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are more susceptible to microvascular complications. However, whether DM is associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is unclear. This observational study used data from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR) (NCT05960474) and included patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who underwent invasive CMD evaluation using the CoroVentis CoroFlow System (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). Patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, echocardiography, coronary angiography, and microvascular physiology results were analyzed. Among the 271 patients, 73 (26.9%) had DM. These patients were more likely to be African American (68.1% vs. 47.0%) and had higher rates of hypertension (93.2% vs. 74.2%), hyperlipidemia (89.0% vs. 68.7%), and chronic kidney disease (17.8% vs. 8.1%) than those without DM. Invasive coronary functional testing showed no significant differences in the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) (17.82 ± 8.17 vs. 19.37 ± 13.14, p = 0.268) or coronary flow reserve (CFR) (3.24 ± 1.73 vs. 3.21 ± 1.86, p = 0.909) between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Similarly, in those testing positive for CMD, there were no significant differences in IMR (27.8 ± 7.4 vs. 32.35 ± 15.22, p = 0.108) or CFR (2.42 ± 1.09 vs. 2.05 ± 0.94, p = 0.199). Although patients with DM exhibited more comorbidities, CMD physiology indices were comparable between the groups.

摘要

2型糖尿病(DM)患者更容易发生微血管并发症。然而,DM是否与冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)相关尚不清楚。这项观察性研究使用了冠状动脉微血管疾病登记处(CMDR)(NCT05960474)的数据,纳入了患有心绞痛且无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(ANOCA)的患者,这些患者使用CoroVentis CoroFlow系统(雅培血管,加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉)进行了有创CMD评估。分析了患者的人口统计学、合并症、实验室数据、超声心动图、冠状动脉造影和微血管生理学结果。在271例患者中,73例(26.9%)患有DM。与无DM的患者相比,这些患者更可能是非裔美国人(68.1%对47.0%),高血压(93.2%对74.2%)、高脂血症(89.0%对68.7%)和慢性肾脏病(17.8%对8.1%)的发生率更高。有创冠状动脉功能测试显示,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者之间的微循环阻力指数(IMR)(17.82±8.17对19.37±13.14,p=0.268)或冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)(3.24±1.73对3.21±1.86,p=0.909)无显著差异。同样,在CMD检测呈阳性的患者中,IMR(27.8±7.4对32.35±15.22,p=0.108)或CFR(2.42±1.09对2.05±0.94,p=0.199)也无显著差异。尽管DM患者表现出更多的合并症,但两组之间的CMD生理学指标相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验