Smits Marius L, Webers Casper, van Dooren Mirte, Mahler Elien A M, Vriezekolk Johanna E, van Tubergen Astrid
Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Jan 31;45(2):41. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05795-6.
This study aimed to explore the perceptions of patients and rheumatologists about a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and identify the barriers and facilitators to its implementation in clinical practice. A mixed methods design was applied. Patients with axSpA who visited the outpatient clinic with active disease (AxSpA Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] ≥ 2.1), but did not receive a treatment adjustment, were identified. These patient cases were discussed in individual semi-structured interviews with the respective treating rheumatologists, and a subgroup of these patients was also interviewed. In parallel, all interviewed participants completed a quantitative survey. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed thematically and descriptively, respectively. Twenty-three patients were discussed with 11 rheumatologists, and 16 of these patients were interviewed personally. Barriers to T2T included challenges in the measurement of inflammatory disease activity using the ASDAS, and numerous patient-related factors such as concern about treatment adaptations. The limited number of viable treatment options and scarce amount of evidence supporting T2T in axSpA, as well as logistical challenges, were additional obstacles. Facilitators included patients' broad knowledge about axSpA, rheumatologists' awareness of T2T recommendations, and positive doctor-patient relationships with the application of shared decision-making. Moreover, a supporting infrastructure, such as one with high accessibility to the outpatient clinic between scheduled visits, was considered necessary for the application of a T2T strategy. In conclusion, numerous barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a T2T strategy in axSpA are present, which need to be considered when applying this treatment approach in clinical practice.
本研究旨在探讨患者和风湿病学家对轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)治疗达标(T2T)策略的看法,并确定其在临床实践中实施的障碍和促进因素。采用了混合方法设计。确定了那些到门诊就诊、患有活动性疾病(轴性脊柱关节炎疾病活动评分[ASDAS]≥2.1)但未接受治疗调整的axSpA患者。这些患者病例在与各自的主治风湿病学家进行的个别半结构式访谈中进行了讨论,并且还对这些患者中的一个亚组进行了访谈。同时,所有接受访谈的参与者都完成了一项定量调查。定性和定量数据分别进行了主题分析和描述性分析。与11名风湿病学家讨论了23例患者,其中16例患者接受了个人访谈。T2T的障碍包括使用ASDAS测量炎症性疾病活动方面的挑战,以及众多与患者相关的因素,如对治疗调整的担忧。可行的治疗选择数量有限、支持axSpA中T2T的证据稀少以及后勤方面的挑战是额外的障碍。促进因素包括患者对axSpA的广泛了解、风湿病学家对T2T建议的认识,以及应用共同决策时积极的医患关系。此外,一个支持性的基础设施,如在预定就诊之间门诊可及性高的基础设施,被认为是实施T2T策略所必需的。总之,axSpA中实施T2T策略存在众多障碍和促进因素,在临床实践中应用这种治疗方法时需要加以考虑。