S. Sinnappan, MS, A. Forte, MS, Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston.
J. Ermann, MD, Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Rheumatol. 2024 May 1;51(5):472-478. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0894.
Clinical practice guidelines are not always followed consistently. To better understand potential barriers to the implementation of treatment recommendations in axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (axSpA/AS), an online survey was conducted.
Email invitations were sent to US rheumatology care providers in January 2023. The questionnaire included 20 questions, with an estimated completion time of 5-7 minutes.
One hundred four of 441 (24%) invitees participated, including 80/104 (77%) board-certified rheumatologists and 20/104 (19%) fellows. Survey participants identified UpToDate (85%), treatment guidelines (74%), and colleagues (54%) as relevant sources of knowledge for managing axSpA/AS. Of the participants, 64% and 53% considered themselves to be at least moderately familiar with the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (ACR/SAA/SPARTAN) and Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ASAS/EULAR) treatment recommendations for axSpA/AS, respectively. Whereas 69% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that disease activity scores are useful for making treatment decisions in axSpA/AS, only 37% measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) frequently (≥ 50% of clinic visits) while 82% do so for C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). PROs are typically recorded during clinic encounters (65%) and CRP/ESR are obtained after the visit (86%). Of the participants, 57% and 47% considered the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score to be at least moderately useful for measuring disease activity in axSpA/AS, respectively; 41% and 37% thought the same about the ASAS 20% improvement criteria and Clinical Disease Activity Index, respectively.
Treatment guidelines are an important resource for rheumatologists who manage patients with axSpA/AS. Although there is general agreement that disease activity monitoring is important, the implementation of the respective recommendations is lacking. Reasons may include lack of familiarity and an underdeveloped infrastructure to efficiently collect PROs.
临床实践指南并非总能得到一致遵循。为了更好地了解在轴性脊柱关节炎和强直性脊柱炎(axSpA/AS)中实施治疗建议的潜在障碍,我们进行了一项在线调查。
2023 年 1 月向美国风湿病学护理提供者发送了电子邮件邀请。问卷包括 20 个问题,预计完成时间为 5-7 分钟。
在 441 名受邀者中,有 104 名(24%)参加了调查,其中 80/104(77%)为 board-certified rheumatologists,20/104(19%)为 fellows。调查参与者认为 UpToDate(85%)、治疗指南(74%)和同事(54%)是管理 axSpA/AS 的相关知识来源。其中 64%和 53%的参与者认为自己对美国风湿病学会/脊柱关节炎协会/脊柱关节炎研究与治疗网络(ACR/SAA/SPARTAN)和评估脊柱关节炎国际协会/欧洲风湿病联盟(ASAS/EULAR)的 axSpA/AS 治疗建议有一定的熟悉程度。尽管 69%的参与者同意或强烈同意疾病活动评分对 axSpA/AS 的治疗决策有用,但只有 37%的人经常(≥50%的就诊次数)测量患者报告的结局(PROs),而 82%的人经常测量 C 反应蛋白(CRP)和红细胞沉降率(ESR)。PROs 通常在就诊时记录(65%),CRP/ESR 在就诊后获得(86%)。在参与者中,57%和 47%分别认为 Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数和强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分对测量 axSpA/AS 的疾病活动至少有一定的用处;41%和 37%分别认为 ASAS20%改善标准和临床疾病活动指数有同样的作用。
治疗指南是管理 axSpA/AS 患者的风湿病医生的重要资源。尽管普遍认为疾病活动监测很重要,但各自建议的实施情况却有所欠缺。原因可能包括缺乏熟悉度和缺乏有效收集 PROs 的基础设施。