Nardot Anaëlle, Lacorre Coralie, Lanneluc Antoine, Paulet Domitille, Gauriat Morgan, Moesch Cyril, Feydeau Pauline, Valantin Emilie, Dupuy Philippe, Blondel Marine, Karam Henri Hani, Baïsse Arthur, Herafa Isabelle, Blanchet Aloïse, Dumolard Manon, Daix Thomas, Lafon Thomas
Emergency Department, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Emergency Department, Guéret Hospital, Guéret, France.
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03877-8.
Implementation of a regional sepsis program to improve compliance with sepsis care bundles and optimize septic patient management and outcomes in the Emergency Department (ED). The program included a multifaceted intervention in 8 EDs: creation of a regional sepsis team, meetings, education (yearly 6-h course and site visits) and sepsis alert. Clinical practice was evaluated in each ED during 1 month every year over 3 years. The primary outcome was the initiation of all criteria of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) bundle within 3 h after triage. Secondary outcomes were the initiation of the 3-h bundle in patients with hypotension (SBP ≤ 100 mmHg), admission related to infection or not, proportion of organ supports, subsequent intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and early mortality (day 7). During the 3-month study period, 739 patients were identified with a sepsis including 8% with septic shock. Compliance with the SSC bundle improved during the three periods (P1: 28/176 (16%), P2: 42/272 (15%), P3:69/291 (24%), p = 0.023). In patients with hypotension (n = 142, 19%), no improvement was observed (P1:12/38 (32%), P2:18/46 (39%), P3: 28/58 (48%), p = 0.255). Mortality on day 7 was also similar (10% vs 11% vs 9%, p = 0.621). In multivariate analysis, age (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05, p = 0.003) and confusion (OR = 2.37; 95% CI 1.37-4.14, p = 0.002) were independently associated with D7 mortality. Patients referred to ED for infection had a better prognosis compared to those with a non-specific reason (OR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-0.97, p = 0.038). A regional sepsis educational program appears to improve compliance with the SSC bundle. Pre-hospital identification of sepsis appears to improve further management.
实施一项区域脓毒症项目,以提高急诊科(ED)对脓毒症护理集束方案的依从性,并优化脓毒症患者的管理及预后。该项目在8个急诊科进行了多方面干预:组建区域脓毒症团队、召开会议、开展教育(每年6小时课程及现场考察)以及发布脓毒症警报。在3年时间里,每年对每个急诊科的临床实践进行为期1个月的评估。主要结局指标为在分诊后3小时内启动脓毒症存活行动(SSC)集束方案的所有标准。次要结局指标包括低血压患者(收缩压≤100 mmHg)在3小时内启动集束方案情况、是否因感染入院、器官支持比例、随后入住重症监护病房(ICU)情况以及早期死亡率(第7天)。在为期3个月的研究期间,共识别出739例脓毒症患者,其中8%为脓毒症休克患者。在三个阶段中,对SSC集束方案的依从性有所改善(第1阶段:28/176(16%),第2阶段:42/272(15%),第3阶段:69/291(24%),p = 0.023)。在低血压患者(n = 142,19%)中,未观察到改善情况(第1阶段:12/38(32%),第2阶段:18/46(39%),第3阶段:28/58(48%),p = 0.255)。第7天的死亡率也相似(10%对11%对9%,p = 0.621)。在多变量分析中,年龄(比值比[OR]=1.03;95%置信区间[CI] 1.01 - 1.05,p = 0.003)和意识模糊(OR = 2.37;95% CI 1.37 - 4.14,p = 0.002)与第7天死亡率独立相关。因感染转诊至急诊科的患者与因非特异性原因转诊的患者相比,预后更好(OR = 0.56;95% CI 0.32 - 0.97,p = 0.038)。一项区域脓毒症教育项目似乎能提高对SSC集束方案的依从性。院前识别脓毒症似乎能改善后续管理。