Bhatia Shailender, Topalian Suzanne L, Sharfman William, Meyer Tim, Steven Neil, Lao Christopher D, Fariñas-Madrid Lorena, Devriese Lot A, Moore Kathleen, Ferris Robert L, Honma Yoshitaka, Elias Ileana, Srirangam Anjaiah, Garnett-Benson Charlie, Lee Michelle, Nghiem Paul
Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 20;43(9):1137-1147. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-02138. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Approximately 50% of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have primary or acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade, which may be overcome using combination immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody. We present results from the recurrent/metastatic MCC cohort in CheckMate 358, a nonrandomized, multicohort, phase I/II study of nivolumab (NIVO) with or without ipilimumab (IPI) in virus-associated cancers (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02488759).
ICI-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic MCC and 0-2 previous systemic therapies were administered NIVO monotherapy at 240 mg once every 2 weeks or combination therapy with NIVO 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks + IPI 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks. The primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
Sixty-eight patients received NIVO (n = 25) or NIVO + IPI (n = 43). The objective response rate (95% CI) and median DOR (95% CI), respectively, were 60% (38.7 to 78.9) and 60.6 months (16.7 to not applicable [NA]) with NIVO and 58% (42.1 to 73) and 25.9 months (10.4 to NA) with NIVO + IPI. The median PFS (95% CI) and OS (95% CI), respectively, were 21.3 (9.2 to 62.5) and 80.7 (23.3 to NA) months with NIVO and 8.4 (3.7 to 24.3) and 29.8 (8.5 to 48.3) months with NIVO + IPI. The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events was 28% with NIVO and 47% with the combination.
This nonrandomized study showed frequent and durable responses with both NIVO and NIVO + IPI in patients with ICI-naïve advanced MCC. However, it did not show improvement in efficacy with the combination, thus contradicting previous study reports that had suggested clinical benefit with combination ICI. A randomized trial of NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy is warranted.
约50%的晚期默克尔细胞癌(MCC)患者对程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)/程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)阻断治疗存在原发性或获得性耐药,使用抗细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原4(CTLA-4)抗体的免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗可能克服这一问题。我们展示了CheckMate 358研究中复发/转移性MCC队列的结果,这是一项关于纳武利尤单抗(NIVO)联合或不联合伊匹木单抗(IPI)用于病毒相关癌症的非随机、多队列、I/II期研究(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02488759)。
既往未接受过免疫检查点抑制剂治疗、患有复发/转移性MCC且既往接受过0-2次全身治疗的患者,接受每2周一次240mg的NIVO单药治疗,或每2周一次3mg/kg的NIVO联合每6周一次1mg/kg的IPI的联合治疗。主要终点为客观缓解。次要终点包括缓解持续时间(DOR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
68例患者接受了NIVO(n = 25)或NIVO + IPI(n = 43)治疗。NIVO治疗的客观缓解率(95%CI)和中位DOR(95%CI)分别为60%(38.7至78.9)和60.6个月(16.7至未达到[NA]),NIVO + IPI治疗的分别为58%(42.1至73)和25.9个月(10.4至NA)。NIVO治疗的中位PFS(95%CI)和OS(95%CI)分别为21.3(9.2至62.5)和80.7(23.3至NA)个月,NIVO + IPI治疗的分别为8.4(3.7至24.3)和29.8(8.5至48.3)个月。3/4级治疗相关不良事件的发生率,NIVO治疗组为28%,联合治疗组为47%。
这项非随机研究显示,NIVO单药治疗和NIVO + IPI联合治疗在既往未接受过免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期MCC患者中均有频繁且持久的缓解。然而,联合治疗并未显示出疗效改善,这与之前提示免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗具有临床获益的研究报告相矛盾。有必要开展一项NIVO + IPI对比NIVO单药治疗的随机试验。