Lobo Dileep N, Neal Keith R
Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Division of Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom; North Wales Medical School, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Clin Nutr. 2025 Mar;46:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2025.01.021. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyse determinants of the 2023 impact factors (IFs) of journals within the field of 'Nutrition and Dietetics'.
The Clarivate™ Journal Citation Reports™ website (https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr/home) was searched on 9 January 2025 for journals with a 2023 IF (published in June 2024) ≥ 6.0 in the field of 'Nutrition and Dietetics'. Analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software.
There were there were 84,040 citations in 2023 to 10,719 works published in 2021 and 2022 in the 12 journals with an IF ≥ 6.0. Median numbers of citations per output were lower than mean citations in all journals. This difference ranged from 0.55 to 3.97. Most outputs (47.5%-79.1 %) had 1-10 citations. The 1538 open access outputs were cited less frequently [mean (95 % CI) 6.98 (6.55-7.40)] than the 9181 subscription outputs [7.99 (7.81-8.16), P < 0.0001]. The 2063 reviews were cited more frequently [8.94 (8.45-9.43)] than the 8656 original articles [7.58 (7.42-7.74), P < 0.0001]. When the highest cited outputs from each journal were excluded, the fall in IFs ranged from 0 to 2.4. The was also the case when the two highest cited outputs were excluded (fall ranged from 0 to 2.7).
This comprehensive analysis of journal IFs has shown that although review articles increase IFs of journals, open access outputs do not. IFs can be distorted by 1 or 2 highly cited outputs and may not reflect the impact of the majority of outputs.
本横断面研究旨在分析“营养与饮食学”领域期刊2023年影响因子(IF)的决定因素。
于2025年1月9日在科睿唯安™期刊引证报告™网站(https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr/home)上搜索“营养与饮食学”领域2023年IF(于2024年6月发布)≥6.0的期刊。使用GraphPad Prism软件进行分析。
IF≥6.0的12种期刊在2023年对2021年和2022年发表的10719篇作品有84040次引用。各期刊每篇产出的引用中位数低于平均引用次数。这种差异在0.55至3.97之间。大多数产出(47.5%-79.1%)有1至10次引用。1538篇开放获取产出的被引频率[均值(95%CI)6.98(6.55-7.40)]低于9181篇订阅产出[7.99(7.81-8.16),P<0.0001]。2063篇综述的被引频率[8.94(8.45-9.43)]高于8656篇原创文章[7.58(7.42-7.74),P<0.0001]。当排除每种期刊被引次数最高的产出时,IF的下降幅度在0至2.4之间。排除被引次数最高的两篇产出时情况也是如此(下降幅度在0至2.7之间)。
对期刊IF的这项综合分析表明,尽管综述文章会提高期刊的IF,但开放获取产出并非如此。IF可能会因1或2篇被高度引用的产出而失真,可能无法反映大多数产出的影响力。