Adler Frederick R, Griffiths Jason I
Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 155 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; School of Biological Sciences, 257 South 1400 East, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112 USA..
Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 155 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2025 Feb;109:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2025.01.005. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
The development and regulation of healthy and cancerous breast tissue is guided by communication between cells. Diverse signals are exchanged between cancer cells and non-cancerous cells of the tumor microenvironment (TME), influencing all stages of tumor progression. Mathematical models are essential for understanding how this complex network determines cancer progression and the effectiveness of treatment.
We reviewed the current dynamical mathematical models of intercellular signaling in breast cancer, examining models with cancer cells only, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages and the immune system as whole. We categorized the goals and complexity of these models, to highlight how they can explain many features of cancer emergence and progression.
We found that dynamical models of intercellular signaling can elucidate tissue-level dysregulation in cancer by explaining: i) maintenance of non-heritable intratumor phenotypic heterogeneity, ii) transitions between tumor dormancy and accelerated invasive growth, iii) stromal support of tumor vascularization and growth factor enrichment and iv) suppression of immune infiltration and cancer surveillance. These models also provide a framework to propose novel TME-targeting treatment strategies. However, most models were focused on a highly selected and small set of signaling interactions between a few cell types, and their translational applicability were severely limited by the availability of tumor-specific data for personalized model calibration.
Mathematical models of breast cancer have many challenges and opportunities to incorporate signaling. The four key challenges are: 1) finding ways to treat signaling networks as a context-dependent language that incorporates non-linear and non-additive responses, 2) identifying the key cell phenotypes that signals control and understanding the feedbacks between signals and phenotype that determine the progression of cancer, (3) estimating parameters of specific patient tumors early in treatment, 4) linking models with novel data collection methods that have single cell and spatial resolution. As our approaches advance, it is our hope that dynamical mathematical models of inter-cellular signaling can play a central role in identifying and testing new treatment strategies as well as forecasting impacts of disease treatment.
健康乳腺组织和癌性乳腺组织的发育与调控受细胞间通讯的引导。癌细胞与肿瘤微环境(TME)中的非癌细胞之间会交换多种信号,影响肿瘤进展的各个阶段。数学模型对于理解这个复杂网络如何决定癌症进展及治疗效果至关重要。
我们回顾了当前乳腺癌细胞间信号传导的动态数学模型,研究了仅包含癌细胞、成纤维细胞、内皮细胞、巨噬细胞以及整个免疫系统的模型。我们对这些模型的目标和复杂性进行了分类,以突出它们如何解释癌症发生和进展的许多特征。
我们发现细胞间信号传导的动态模型可以通过解释以下方面来阐明癌症中的组织水平失调:i)非遗传性肿瘤内表型异质性的维持;ii)肿瘤休眠与加速侵袭性生长之间的转变;iii)肿瘤血管生成和生长因子富集的基质支持;iv)免疫浸润和癌症监测的抑制。这些模型还提供了一个框架,以提出针对肿瘤微环境的新型治疗策略。然而,大多数模型集中于少数细胞类型之间高度选择且少量的信号相互作用,并且它们的转化适用性受到用于个性化模型校准的肿瘤特异性数据可用性的严重限制。
乳腺癌的数学模型在纳入信号传导方面有许多挑战和机遇。四个关键挑战是:1)找到将信号网络视为一种包含非线性和非加性反应的上下文相关语言的方法;2)识别信号控制的关键细胞表型,并理解信号与表型之间决定癌症进展的反馈;3)在治疗早期估计特定患者肿瘤的参数;4)将模型与具有单细胞和空间分辨率的新型数据收集方法相联系。随着我们方法的进步,我们希望细胞间信号传导的动态数学模型能够在识别和测试新的治疗策略以及预测疾病治疗影响方面发挥核心作用。