Vilkko Riitta, Heinonen Seppo, Räisänen Sari, Gissler Mika, Andersson Sture, Leskinen Markus
Faculty of Medicin, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):e086868. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086868.
To evaluate the effect of delivery hospital busyness on the postnatal condition and the perinatal mortality among small preterm infants born at ≤32+0 gestational weeks.
The daily delivery volume distribution is defined as lowest 10% ('quiet') and highest 10% ('busy') delivery-volume days, and days between (80%) as optimal delivery-volume days. We analysed differences in the incidence of selected adverse outcomes between quiet and busy days compared with optimal delivery-volume days by logistic regression followed by crude (ORs) and adjusted ORs (aORs) with 99% CIs.
A population-based cohort study based on prospectively collected real-world data from five university hospitals and 21 non-tertiary-level delivery hospitals in Finland, 2006‒2016.
4323 small preterm infants.
Umbilical cord pH ≤7.05, Apgar score 0-3 points at the age of 1 min, Apgar score 0-3 points at age 5 min, birth asphyxia (International Classification of Diseases-10 code), resuscitation with intubation.
Perinatal mortality comprising stillbirths and early neonatal deaths (<7 days).
Busy days (busy vs optimal) showed no correlation with the primary birth-related outcomes. However, in the university hospitals, quiet days were associated with 80% lower odds of asphyxia (aOR 0.20, 99% CI 0.08 to 0.48) and 47% lower odds of resuscitation (aOR 0.53, 99% CI 0.39 to 0.72) compared with their incidence on optimal days.In university hospitals, the odds of early neonatal mortality among small preterm infants on busy days were twofold (aOR 2.08, 99% CI 1.26 to 3.45) than on optimal days. In the non-tertiary hospitals, however, this difference was statistically non-significant (aOR 0.68, 99% CI 0.19 to 2.45).
In the tertiary university delivery hospitals, busyness was associated with a twofold increase in early neonatal mortality among small preterm infants, whereas infants' condition at birth on busy days was comparable to their condition on optimal days. Neonatal capacity in tertiary units during busy days may be critical under stress.
评估分娩医院的繁忙程度对孕周≤32+0周的小早产儿产后状况及围产期死亡率的影响。
将每日分娩量分布定义为分娩量最低的10%(“安静”)和最高的10%(“繁忙”)的日子,两者之间的日子(80%)为最佳分娩量日子。通过逻辑回归分析,然后计算粗比值比(OR)和调整后的比值比(aOR)及99%置信区间(CI),分析安静日和繁忙日与最佳分娩量日相比选定不良结局发生率的差异。
一项基于人群的队列研究,数据来自2006 - 2016年芬兰五所大学医院和21所非三级分娩医院前瞻性收集的真实世界数据。
4323名小早产儿。
脐动脉血pH≤7.05、1分钟龄时阿氏评分0 - 3分、5分钟龄时阿氏评分0 - 3分、出生窒息(国际疾病分类-10编码)、气管插管复苏。
包括死产和早期新生儿死亡(<7天)的围产期死亡率。
繁忙日(繁忙日与最佳日相比)与主要的出生相关结局无相关性。然而,在大学医院,与最佳日相比,安静日窒息几率降低80%(aOR 0 .20,99%CI 0.08至0.48),复苏几率降低47%(aOR 0.53,99%CI 0.39至0.72)。在大学医院,繁忙日小早产儿早期新生儿死亡几率是最佳日的两倍(aOR 2.08,99%CI 1.26至3.45)。然而,在非三级医院,这种差异无统计学意义(aOR 0.68,99%CI 0.19至2.45)。
在三级大学分娩医院,繁忙程度与小早产儿早期新生儿死亡率增加两倍相关,而繁忙日出生时婴儿状况与最佳日相当。繁忙日三级医院的新生儿处理能力在压力下可能至关重要。