Pettitt Christine, Chapko Dorota, Budhathoki Shyam Sundar, Murray Keitumetse-Kabelo, Ward Helen
Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
Imperial College London, NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):e089766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089766.
Traditionally, patients have had passive roles in medical education; however, there have been increasing efforts to partner with communities to create authentic representation of laypeople in medical education. Communities' perspectives of these initiatives have rarely been reported in the literature. This study explores the perspectives of members of community-based organisations (CBOs) who were partnered with a community engagement programme for intercalating medical students at Imperial College London.
A qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted, employing reflexive thematic analysis.
London, UK.
A total of five participants (one member from five CBOs who agreed to participate) were interviewed for this study. The selection criterion was direct involvement in the community engagement programme.
Three key themes were identified aligning with the core principles of co-production: building partnership, reciprocity in partnership and maintenance of relationship. Partnership development was influenced by the CBOs' perception of students which caused power differentials in the development of learning plans. Reciprocity refers to a multidirectional benefit pathway resulting from the community involvement programme, which had short-term and anticipated long-term effects. Relationships built were maintained via a service evaluation report, and participants discussed how attitudes of academic institutions towards collaboration influence communities' ability to participate in medical education.
The perspectives of CBOs reported in this study demonstrate that factors important to partnership development in community-engaged medical education are consistent with the key principles of co-production. Supported by literature, the findings emphasise that community involvement can be linked to social accountability and sustainable health practice. Provided that the possible risks/challenges are appropriately identified and mitigated to facilitate co-productive partnerships between stakeholders, the involvement of CBOs in medical education has the potential to provide benefits for communities, students and educational institutions.
传统上,患者在医学教育中扮演被动角色;然而,如今人们越来越努力与社区合作,以便在医学教育中真实呈现普通民众的形象。关于这些举措,社区的观点在文献中鲜有报道。本研究探讨了与伦敦帝国理工学院针对插班医学生的社区参与项目合作的社区组织(CBO)成员的观点。
采用半结构化访谈进行定性研究,并运用反思性主题分析。
英国伦敦。
本研究共访谈了五名参与者(来自五个同意参与的CBO的一名成员)。选择标准是直接参与社区参与项目。
确定了与共同生产的核心原则相符的三个关键主题:建立伙伴关系、伙伴关系中的互惠以及关系维护。伙伴关系的发展受到CBO对学生的看法的影响,这在学习计划制定过程中造成了权力差异。互惠指的是社区参与项目带来的多向受益途径,具有短期和预期的长期影响。通过服务评估报告维持已建立的关系,参与者讨论了学术机构对合作的态度如何影响社区参与医学教育的能力。
本研究中报告的CBO的观点表明,社区参与医学教育中伙伴关系发展的重要因素与共同生产的关键原则一致。研究结果得到文献支持,强调社区参与可与社会问责制和可持续健康实践相联系。只要适当识别并减轻可能的风险/挑战,以促进利益相关者之间的共同生产伙伴关系,CBO参与医学教育就有可能为社区、学生和教育机构带来益处。