• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告信息的有效性:患者报告与登记数据之间的一致率。

Validity of patient-reported information: agreement rate between patient reports and registry data.

作者信息

Watanabe Tomone, Ichinose Yuichi, Toida Tsutomu, Higashi Takahiro

机构信息

Division of Health Services Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12324-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12324-5
PMID:39891116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11783825/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of patient-reported clinical information, including cancer stage, is not well understood. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between patient-reported survey data and clinical information recorded in hospital-based cancer registries (HBCR).

METHODS

A total of 730 patients from 166 hospitals in Japan were randomly selected and informed that their survey responses would be validated against HBCR data. Demographic details, including age, sex, cancer stage, and cancer site, were recorded and compared with clinical data from the HBCR. Agreement rates between patients' self-reported demographic and clinical data and the corresponding HBCR records were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with accurate reporting of cancer stage information.

RESULTS

Agreement rates for age, sex, and cancer site were 99.4%, 99.8%, and over 90% across all cancer sites, respectively. The agreement rate for cancer stage reporting was 49.9%. Patients with stage IV cancer had the highest agreement rate at 68.4%. Patients under 75 years of age and those with specific cancer types demonstrated higher odds of reporting data consistent with HBCR records.

CONCLUSIONS

For cancer stage data, relying on more credible sources, such as cancer registries, is recommended over patient-reported information to ensure accuracy.

摘要

背景

患者报告的临床信息(包括癌症分期)的准确性尚未得到充分了解。本研究旨在评估患者报告的调查数据与医院癌症登记处(HBCR)记录的临床信息之间的一致性。

方法

从日本166家医院中随机选取730名患者,并告知他们的调查回复将与HBCR数据进行验证。记录包括年龄、性别、癌症分期和癌症部位在内的人口统计学细节,并与HBCR的临床数据进行比较。分析患者自我报告的人口统计学和临床数据与相应HBCR记录之间的一致率。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与准确报告癌症分期信息相关的因素。

结果

所有癌症部位的年龄、性别和癌症部位的一致率分别为99.4%、99.8%和90%以上。癌症分期报告的一致率为49.9%。IV期癌症患者的一致率最高,为68.4%。75岁以下的患者和患有特定癌症类型的患者报告与HBCR记录一致数据的几率更高。

结论

对于癌症分期数据,为确保准确性,建议依靠更可靠的来源,如癌症登记处,而不是患者报告的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aee/11783825/6e9bfe21137e/12913_2025_12324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aee/11783825/6e9bfe21137e/12913_2025_12324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aee/11783825/6e9bfe21137e/12913_2025_12324_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity of patient-reported information: agreement rate between patient reports and registry data.患者报告信息的有效性:患者报告与登记数据之间的一致率。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12324-5.
2
Validity of self-reported cancer: Comparison between self-report versus cancer registry records in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.癌症自我报告的有效性:在基隆骨质疏松研究中自我报告与癌症登记记录的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;68:101790. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101790. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
3
Validity of registry data: agreement between cancer records in an end-stage kidney disease registry (voluntary reporting) and a cancer register (statutory reporting).注册数据的有效性:终末期肾病注册(自愿报告)中的癌症记录与癌症登记处(法定报告)之间的一致性。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Jun;15(4):491-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01297.x.
4
Agreement between self-reported and central cancer registry-recorded prevalence of cancer in the Alaska EARTH study.阿拉斯加地球研究中自我报告的癌症患病率与中央癌症登记记录的癌症患病率之间的一致性。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2019 Dec;78(1):1571383. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2019.1571383.
5
The role of hospital-based cancer registries in low and middle income countries-The Nigerian Case Study.医院癌症登记处在中低收入国家的作用——尼日利亚案例研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;36(5):430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
6
[A Systematic Review of Clinical and Epidemiological Studies Using Record Linkage Data between Hospital Based Cancer Registries and Biospecimen Data].[一项利用医院癌症登记处与生物样本数据之间的记录链接数据进行的临床和流行病学研究的系统评价]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2021 Dec;48(12):1469-1474.
7
Are hospitals in Japan with larger patient volume treating younger and earlier-stage cancer patients? An analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.日本患者量较大的医院是否在治疗更年轻、更早阶段的癌症患者?对日本医院癌症登记数据的分析。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;45(8):719-26. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv069. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
Surgically treated gastric cancer in Japan: 2011 annual report of the national clinical database gastric cancer registry.日本外科治疗胃癌:全国临床数据库胃癌登记处 2011 年年度报告。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 May;24(3):545-566. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01178-5. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
9
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.意大利癌症数据——2015年报告:意大利罕见癌症的负担
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.
10
Are hospital cancer caseloads related to the validity of staging data reported? A lesson from National Cancer Registry in Taiwan.医院的癌症病例数与所报告分期数据的有效性有关吗?来自台湾国家癌症登记处的经验教训。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;47(1):18-24. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw149. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Health literacy and the role of social support in different age groups: results of a German cross-sectional survey.健康素养与社会支持在不同年龄组中的作用:德国横断面调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):2259. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17145-x.
2
Gender differences of health literacy in persons with a migration background: a systematic review and meta-analysis.具有移民背景人群健康素养的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 19;12(7):e056090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056090.
3
Understanding the Changing Landscape of Health Disparities in Chronic Liver Diseases and Liver Cancer.
了解慢性肝病和肝癌中健康差距的变化态势。
Gastro Hep Adv. 2023;2(4):505-520. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Factors influencing the e-health literacy in cancer patients: a systematic review.影响癌症患者电子健康素养的因素:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Apr;17(2):425-440. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01260-6. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
5
Gender differences in factors associated with the health literacy of hospitalized older patients with chronic diseases: A cross-sectional study.性别差异与住院慢性病老年患者健康素养相关因素的关系:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;10:944103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.944103. eCollection 2022.
6
Fitting Health Care to People: Understanding and Adapting to the Epidemiology and Health Literacy of People Affected by Viral Hepatitis from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Migrant Backgrounds.适配医疗保健服务于人群:理解和适应具有不同文化和语言背景的受病毒性肝炎影响的移民人群的流行病学和健康素养。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Oct;24(5):1196-1205. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01305-5. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Experiences of patients with cancer at health care facilities in Japan: results from a nationwide survey.日本医疗机构中癌症患者的体验:一项全国性调查的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):1180. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07184-8.
8
Health literacy and shared decision making in prostate cancer screening: Equality versus equity.前列腺癌筛查中的健康素养与共同决策:平等与公平
Cancer. 2021 Jan 15;127(2):181-183. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33235. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Gender differences in the impact of health literacy on hospital readmission among older heart failure patients: A prospective cohort study.老年心力衰竭患者中健康素养对再入院影响的性别差异:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jun;76(6):1345-1354. doi: 10.1111/jan.14328. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
10
Advanced cancer patients' understanding of prognostic information: Applying insights from psychological research.晚期癌症患者对预后信息的理解:运用心理研究的见解。
Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(9):4081-4088. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2331. Epub 2019 Jun 14.