• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用超扫描脑电图数据对比纸质书阅读与屏幕阅读时亲子间更强的大脑同步性

Greater Parent-Child Brain Synchronisation During Printed Book Versus Screen Reading Using Hyperscanning Electroencephalograph Data.

作者信息

Jomaa Fauzi, Ebraheem Fatma, Horowitz-Kraus Tzipi

机构信息

Educational Neuroimaging Group, Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2025 Jul;114(7):1633-1641. doi: 10.1111/apa.70007. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1111/apa.70007
PMID:39891366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12147426/
Abstract

AIM

The differences between parent-child joint attention while reading together from a screen versus from a paper are unknown. The current study aimed to determine if parent-child brains synchronise differently during screen-based versus printed paper-based, in other words, a book reading.

METHODS

The study was carried out in 2022 in Israel. Cohorts were recruited via posted ads. Cognitive and behavioural measures were assessed using standardised tests. In addition, two reading sessions were administered by the parent, one on the screen and another using a book, while electroencephalograph data captured their brain synchronisation. The difference in brain synchronisation between the conditions was correlated with behavioural measures.

RESULTS

Of the 49 parent-child pairs age 3.94 years ± 0.751; 24 females who participated in language-based tasks for this study, electroencephalograph data from 11 dyads showed a higher brain-to-brain synchronisation during printed-based reading compared to screen-based reading was found and associated with the child's verbal and cognitive abilities.

CONCLUSION

Printed-paper reading fosters a higher parent-child neural synchronisation and cognitive engagement compared to screen-based reading.

摘要

目的

亲子在通过屏幕阅读与纸质阅读时共同注意力的差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定在基于屏幕阅读与基于印刷纸张阅读(即阅读书籍)过程中,亲子大脑的同步方式是否存在差异。

方法

该研究于2022年在以色列开展。通过张贴广告招募研究对象。使用标准化测试评估认知和行为指标。此外,由家长进行两次阅读活动,一次在屏幕上进行,另一次使用书籍,同时脑电图数据记录他们的大脑同步情况。两种阅读条件下大脑同步的差异与行为指标相关联。

结果

在参与本研究语言任务的49对年龄为3.94岁±0.751岁的亲子对中(其中24对为女性),11对二元组的脑电图数据显示,与基于屏幕的阅读相比,基于印刷纸张的阅读过程中大脑间同步性更高,且与儿童的语言和认知能力相关。

结论

与基于屏幕的阅读相比,纸质阅读能促进更高的亲子神经同步性和认知参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034d/12147426/926f6921fc68/APA-114-1633-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034d/12147426/e6a946c99036/APA-114-1633-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034d/12147426/5aaed3002fb0/APA-114-1633-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034d/12147426/926f6921fc68/APA-114-1633-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034d/12147426/e6a946c99036/APA-114-1633-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034d/12147426/5aaed3002fb0/APA-114-1633-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/034d/12147426/926f6921fc68/APA-114-1633-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Greater Parent-Child Brain Synchronisation During Printed Book Versus Screen Reading Using Hyperscanning Electroencephalograph Data.使用超扫描脑电图数据对比纸质书阅读与屏幕阅读时亲子间更强的大脑同步性
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Jul;114(7):1633-1641. doi: 10.1111/apa.70007. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Do Children's Brains Function Differently During Book Reading and Screen Time? A fNIRS Study.儿童在阅读书籍和看屏幕时大脑功能是否不同?一项近红外光谱研究。
Dev Sci. 2025 Mar;28(2):e13615. doi: 10.1111/desc.13615.
3
Impacts of a shared book-reading intervention for Italian-speaking children with developmental language disorder.意大利语发展性语言障碍儿童共享阅读干预的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Jul;54(4):565-579. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12460. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Parent-Toddler Social Reciprocity During Reading From Electronic Tablets vs Print Books.使用电子平板电脑与纸质书阅读时的亲子社交互动
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Nov 1;173(11):1076-1083. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3480.
5
Higher theta-beta ratio during screen-based vs. printed paper is related to lower attention in children: An EEG study.基于屏幕的阅读与纸质阅读相比,更高的θ-β 比值与儿童注意力下降有关:一项 EEG 研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0283863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283863. eCollection 2023.
6
Differences in Parent-Toddler Interactions With Electronic Versus Print Books.家长与幼儿使用电子书籍与印刷书籍互动的差异。
Pediatrics. 2019 Apr;143(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2012.
7
Parent-child interaction during storybook reading: wordless narrative books versus books with text.绘本阅读过程中的亲子互动:无字叙事绘本与有文字绘本的比较。
J Child Lang. 2023 Jan;50(1):104-131. doi: 10.1017/S0305000921000763. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
8
Embedding key word sign prompts in a shared book reading activity: The impact on communication between children with Down syndrome and their parents.在共享阅读活动中嵌入关键词提示:对唐氏综合征儿童与其父母之间沟通的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1029-1045. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12842. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
9
Book reading styles in dual-parent and single-mother families.双亲家庭与单亲母亲家庭中的读书方式。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Sep;76(Pt 3):501-15. doi: 10.1348/000709905X49719.
10
Dialogic reading vs screen exposure intervention is related to increased cognitive control in preschool-age children.对话式阅读与屏幕暴露干预相关,可增加学龄前儿童的认知控制能力。
Acta Paediatr. 2019 Nov;108(11):1993-2000. doi: 10.1111/apa.14841. Epub 2019 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced mother-child brain-to-brain synchrony during joint storytelling interaction interrupted by a media usage.在讲故事的互动中,当被媒体使用打断时,母子大脑同步性会降低。
Child Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;28(7):918-937. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2034774. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
2
The Impact of COVID-19 on Families' Home Literacy Practices with Young Children.新冠疫情对家庭幼儿家庭读写实践的影响。
Early Child Educ J. 2022;50(8):1429-1438. doi: 10.1007/s10643-021-01270-6. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
High screen use by children aged 12-36 months during the first COVID-19 lockdown was associated with parental stress and screen use.
在首次新冠疫情封锁期间,12至36个月大儿童的高屏幕使用时长与父母的压力及屏幕使用情况有关。
Acta Paediatr. 2021 Oct;110(10):2808-2809. doi: 10.1111/apa.15979. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
Dialogic reading vs screen exposure intervention is related to increased cognitive control in preschool-age children.对话式阅读与屏幕暴露干预相关,可增加学龄前儿童的认知控制能力。
Acta Paediatr. 2019 Nov;108(11):1993-2000. doi: 10.1111/apa.14841. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
5
Maternal reading fluency is positively associated with greater functional connectivity between the child's future reading network and regions related to executive functions and language processing in preschool-age children.母亲的阅读流畅性与学龄前儿童未来阅读网络与执行功能及语言处理相关区域之间更强的功能连接呈正相关。
Brain Cogn. 2018 Mar;121:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
6
Story time turbocharger? Child engagement during shared reading and cerebellar activation and connectivity in preschool-age children listening to stories.故事时间涡轮增压器?学龄前儿童在亲子共读时的参与度以及听故事时小脑的激活和连通性。
PLoS One. 2017 May 31;12(5):e0177398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177398. eCollection 2017.
7
A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development.儿童指向性言语的数量和质量在词汇发展中的作用的纵向研究。
Child Dev. 2012 Sep-Oct;83(5):1762-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.x. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
8
The peabody picture vocabulary test as a pre-screening tool for global cognitive functioning in childhood brain tumor survivors.佩伯代因图片词汇测验作为儿童脑瘤幸存者全面认知功能的预筛选工具。
J Neurooncol. 2011 Sep;104(2):559-63. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0521-1. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
9
To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood.读与不读:从婴儿期到成年早期的印刷品暴露的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;137(2):267-96. doi: 10.1037/a0021890.
10
Can the error detection mechanism benefit from training the working memory? A comparison between dyslexics and controls--an ERP study.错误检测机制能否受益于工作记忆训练?阅读障碍者与对照组的比较——一项 ERP 研究。
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 25;4(9):e7141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007141.