Martire Maria Sofia, Moiola Lucia, Maggi Pietro, Borrelli Serena, Novati Valentina, Martinelli Vittorio, Rocca Maria A, Vezzulli Paolo, Falini Andrea, Filippi Massimo, Absinta Martina
Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Translational Neuropathology Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Mult Scler. 2025 Jul;31(8):955-963. doi: 10.1177/13524585251314358. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) are valuable for diagnosing and prognosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and detectable at 7T and 3T MRI. For translation into clinical practice, it is essential assessing their visibility on 1.5T clinical scanners.
To evaluate the reliability of detecting PRL using commercially available susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 1.5 versus 3T MRI.
SWI images were obtained in 20 people with MS at 1.5T and 3T MRI, with an average scan interval of 1.1 years. Only stable, non-enhancing lesions visible on both scans were analyzed. PRL at 3T were identified by two expert raters using NAIMS PRL criteria and used as a reference. Four raters, blinded to 3T results, assessed PRL at 1.5T. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
PRL were identified in 16 of 20 patients. At 3T, 95 PRL were identified by consensus (mean 5 PRL per patient, range 0-30). Blinded to 3T scans, 82% of PRL were visible at 1.5T (78 of 95 PRL). Interrater reliability was "almost perfect" for both 1.5 and 3T scans. Raters accurately classified all patients as having ⩾1PRL or not at 1.5T.
The majority of PRL are detectable at 1.5T without significantly reducing the specificity of PRL identification or increasing the detection of pseudo-PRL. This may facilitate their clinical use in MS diagnosis and prognosis.
顺磁性边缘病变(PRL)对多发性硬化症(MS)的诊断和预后评估具有重要价值,在7T和3T磁共振成像(MRI)中均可检测到。为了将其应用于临床实践,评估它们在1.5T临床扫描仪上的可见性至关重要。
评估在1.5T与3T MRI下使用商用磁敏感加权成像(SWI)检测PRL的可靠性。
对20例MS患者进行了1.5T和3T MRI的SWI成像,平均扫描间隔为1.1年。仅分析在两次扫描中均可见的稳定、无强化病变。3T时的PRL由两名专家评估者根据NAIMS PRL标准进行识别并用作参考。四名对3T结果不知情的评估者评估1.5T时的PRL。通过共识解决分歧。
20例患者中有16例发现PRL。在3T时,经共识确定有95个PRL(平均每位患者5个PRL,范围0 - 30)。在不知3T扫描结果的情况下,95个PRL中有82%(78个)在1.5T时可见。1.5T和3T扫描的评估者间可靠性均为“几乎完美”。评估者在1.5T时准确地将所有患者分类为有≥1个PRL或无PRL。
大多数PRL在1.5T时可检测到,且不会显著降低PRL识别的特异性或增加假PRL的检测。这可能有助于其在MS诊断和预后评估中的临床应用。