From the Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center (J.A.R., A.B., D.J., M.M., N.B., F. Salman, F. Schweser, M.G.D., R.Z.), Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo; Department of Biostatistics (G.W.), School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo; and Center for Biomedical Imaging at the Clinical Translational Science Institute (B.W.-G.), University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
Neurology. 2024 Nov 26;103(10):e210004. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210004. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Recent technological advances have enabled visualizing in vivo a subset of chronic active brain lesions in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), referred to as "paramagnetic rim lesions" (PRLs), with iron-sensitive MRI. PRLs predict future clinical disease progression, making them a promising clinical and translational imaging marker. However, it is unknown how disease progression is modified by PRL evolution (PRL disappearance, new PRL appearance). This is key to understanding MS pathophysiology and may help inform selection of sensitive endpoints for clinical trials targeting chronic active inflammation. To this end, we assessed the longitudinal associations between PRL disappearance and new PRL appearance and clinical disability progression and brain atrophy.
PwMS and healthy controls (HCs) were included from a larger prospective, longitudinal cohort study at the University at Buffalo if they had available 3T MRI and clinical visits at baseline and follow-up timepoints. PwMS with sufficient clinical data for confirmed disability progression (CDP) analysis were included in a Disability Progression Cohort, and pwMS and HCs with brain volumetry data at baseline and follow-up were included in MS and HC Brain Atrophy cohorts. PRLs were assessed at baseline and follow-up and assigned as disappearing, newly appearing, or persisting at follow-up. Linear models were fit to compare annualized PRL disappearance rates or new PRL appearance (yes/no) with annualized rates of CDP and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) or with annualized rates of brain atrophy, adjusting for covariates including baseline PRL number and follow-up time. Statistical analyses were corrected for false discovery rate (FDR; i.e., -value).
In total, 160 pwMS (73.8% female; mean baseline age 46.6 ± 11.4 years; mean baseline disease duration 13.8 ± 10.6 years; median follow-up time 5.6 [interquartile range 5.2-7.8] years; 26.9% progressive MS) and 27 HCs (74.1% female; mean baseline age 43.9 ± 13.6 years; median follow-up time 5.4 [5.2-5.6] years) were enrolled. Greater PRL disappearance rates were associated with reduced rates of CDP (β mean = -0.262, 95% CI -0.475 to -0.049, = 0.028) and PIRA (β mean = -0.283, 95% CI -0.492 to -0.073, = 0.036), and new PRL appearance was associated with increased rates of PIRA (β mean = 0.223, 95% CI 0.049-0.398, = 0.036). By contrast, no associations between new PRL appearance or PRL disappearance and brain volume changes survived FDR correction ( > 0.05).
Our results show that resolution of existing PRLs and lack of new PRLs are associated with improved clinical outcomes. These findings further motivate the need for novel therapies targeting microglia-mediated brain inflammation and adoption of clinical strategies to prevent appearance of new PRL.
最近的技术进步使人们能够利用铁敏感 MRI 技术在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中可视化体内的一部分慢性活跃性脑损伤,这些病变被称为“顺磁性边缘病变”(PRL)。PRL 可预测未来的临床疾病进展,因此是一种很有前途的临床和转化影像学标志物。然而,目前尚不清楚 PRL 演变(PRL 消失、新 PRL 出现)如何改变疾病进展。这对于理解 MS 的病理生理学至关重要,并且可能有助于为针对慢性活跃性炎症的临床试验选择敏感的终点。为此,我们评估了 PRL 消失和新 PRL 出现与临床残疾进展和脑萎缩之间的纵向关联。
如果在布法罗大学的一项前瞻性、纵向队列研究中有可用的 3T MRI 和基线及随访时间点的临床就诊信息,我们将 MS 患者和健康对照(HC)纳入研究。在有足够的临床数据进行确认残疾进展(CDP)分析的 MS 患者中纳入残疾进展队列,在有基线和随访脑容量数据的 MS 患者和 HC 中纳入 MS 和 HC 脑萎缩队列。在基线和随访时评估 PRL,并将其归类为消失、新出现或在随访时持续存在。线性模型用于比较 PRL 消失的年化率或新 PRL 出现(是/否)与 CDP 和独立于复发活动的进展率(PIRA)或脑萎缩的年化率,调整了包括基线 PRL 数量和随访时间在内的协变量。统计分析对假发现率(FDR;即 - 值)进行了校正。
共纳入 160 名 MS 患者(73.8%为女性;平均基线年龄 46.6 ± 11.4 岁;平均基线病程 13.8 ± 10.6 年;中位随访时间 5.6 [四分位间距 5.2-7.8] 年;26.9%为进展型 MS)和 27 名 HC(74.1%为女性;平均基线年龄 43.9 ± 13.6 岁;中位随访时间 5.4 [5.2-5.6] 年)。PRL 消失率较高与 CDP 率降低相关(β 均值 = -0.262,95%CI -0.475 至 -0.049, = 0.028)和 PIRA 率降低相关(β 均值 = -0.283,95%CI -0.492 至 -0.073, = 0.036),新 PRL 出现与 PIRA 率增加相关(β 均值 = 0.223,95%CI 0.049-0.398, = 0.036)。相反,新 PRL 出现或 PRL 消失与脑体积变化之间没有关联通过 FDR 校正后仍然存在(> 0.05)。
我们的研究结果表明,现有的 PRL 消退和新 PRL 缺乏与改善的临床结局相关。这些发现进一步证明了需要针对小胶质细胞介导的脑炎症的新疗法,以及采用预防新 PRL 出现的临床策略。