Suppr超能文献

2019年冠状病毒病通用监测数据与哨点监测数据的比较分析:来自阿根廷、智利和墨西哥的见解(2020 - 2022年)

A Comparative Analysis of Universal and Sentinel Surveillance Data for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Insights From Argentina, Chile, and Mexico (2020-2022).

作者信息

Redondo-Bravo Lidia, Zureick Kinda, Voto Carla, Molina Avendaño Xaviera, Flores-Cisneros Laura, Fowlkes Ashley, Iummato Luciana Eva, Giovacchini Carlos, Olivares Barraza Maria Fernanda, Rodriguez Ferrari Paula, Gutiérrez-Vargas Rosaura, Zaragoza-Jiménez Christian Arturo, García-Rodríguez Gabriel, López-Gatell Hugo, Rodríguez Ángel, Couto Paula, Rondy Marc, Vicari Andrea S

机构信息

PAHO Health Emergencies, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.

Influenza Division, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 10;231(Supplement_2):S114-S122. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae620.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2020, countries implemented universal surveillance to detect and monitor severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases. Although crucial for early monitoring efforts, universal surveillance is resource intensive. To understand the implications of transitioning from universal to sentinel surveillance for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and disease seriousness, we compared measures of SARS-CoV-2 reported from both surveillance strategies in Argentina, Chile, and Mexico.

METHODS

We obtained weekly case counts in Argentina, Chile, and Mexico, in periods when both universal and sentinel surveillance were ongoing. To assess the countries' surveillance strategies, we measured the proportion of total sites that were included in sentinel surveillance. We compared 8 measures of SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and disease seriousness between sentinel and universal surveillance and assessed the correlation between the 2 strategies for the 8 measures. Pearson and Spearman correlation was classified as very strong (rs = 0.8-1.0), strong (rs = 0.60-0.79), moderate (rs = 0.50-0.59), or poor (r < 0.50).

RESULTS

The proportion of total sites included in sentinel surveillance was 5.8% for Argentina, 1.1% for Chile, and 7.6% for Mexico. A total of 21 measures were calculated (8 for Mexico, 8 for Chile, and 5 for Argentina). Of these, 17 showed consistency between the 2 surveillance strategies, with strong or very strong correlations (r = 0.66-0.99): all 8 measures for Mexico, 6 of 8 measures for Chile, and 3 of 5 measures for Argentina. Each country had ≥1 measure reflecting transmissibility and ≥1 reflecting morbidity and mortality for which the correlation was strong or very strong. Chile and Mexico also had ≥1 measure of disease seriousness for which the correlation was strong.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the integration of SARS-CoV-2 into national sentinel surveillance can yield information comparable to that provided by nationwide universal surveillance for measures related to SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and seriousness of disease.

摘要

背景

2020年,各国实施了全面监测以检测和监测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病例。尽管全面监测对早期监测工作至关重要,但资源消耗巨大。为了解从全面监测过渡到哨点监测对监测SARS-CoV-2传播性、发病率和死亡率以及疾病严重程度的影响,我们比较了阿根廷、智利和墨西哥两种监测策略报告的SARS-CoV-2相关指标。

方法

我们获取了阿根廷、智利和墨西哥在全面监测和哨点监测同时进行期间的每周病例数。为评估各国的监测策略,我们计算了纳入哨点监测的站点占总站点的比例。我们比较了哨点监测和全面监测之间SARS-CoV-2传播性、发病率和死亡率以及疾病严重程度的8项指标,并评估了这两种策略在这8项指标上的相关性。Pearson和Spearman相关性分为非常强(rs = 0.8 - 1.0)、强(rs = 0.60 - 0.79)、中度(rs = 0.50 - 0.59)或弱(r < 0.50)。

结果

阿根廷纳入哨点监测的站点占总站点的比例为5.8%,智利为1.1%,墨西哥为7.6%。共计算了21项指标(墨西哥8项,智利8项,阿根廷5项)。其中,17项指标在两种监测策略之间表现出一致性,具有强或非常强的相关性(r = 0.66 - 0.99):墨西哥的所有8项指标,智利8项指标中的6项,阿根廷5项指标中的3项。每个国家都有≥1项反映传播性的指标和≥1项反映发病率和死亡率的指标,其相关性为强或非常强。智利和墨西哥还有≥1项疾病严重程度指标,其相关性为强。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,将SARS-CoV-2纳入国家哨点监测能够产生与全国全面监测提供的信息相当的信息,用于与SARS-CoV-2传播性、发病率和死亡率以及疾病严重程度相关的指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3540/11892001/28b39105e007/jiae620f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验